Eric Foner on Writing about Lincoln

Question: What inspired you to write “Our Lincoln”?

Foner:    This book was inspired, you might say, by the recognition that we are coming up in February 2009 to the bicentennial of Lincoln’s birth and there we can expect even greater interest in Lincoln than normal.  And perhaps, hoopla, there would be a Steven Spielberg movie about Lincoln.  I’m not one of those who tend to think all that highly of Hollywood history.  There’s a lot of things coming out about Lincoln which are, I’d say from a scholarly point of view not very rigorous or valuable.  The point of this book was to get some very distinguished scholars, some of whom have never really written about Lincoln before but are scholars of the 19th century to try to put Lincoln into the context of his time, and in so doing, to really get away from what I think as tendency nowadays to just study Lincoln.  People who study Lincoln just look at Lincoln.  Lincoln psychology explains Lincoln’s actions.  Lincoln’s career as a lawyer explains the stands he took on slavery.  Lincoln’s, you know, experience with his wife explains certain things he did.  In other words, to understand Lincoln, you only have to know Lincoln according to a lot of literature that is out there now.  And we don’t really, as historians we don’t really feel that is an adequate way of looking at Lincoln.  Lincoln is a man of his time.  Lincoln is influenced by people in his time.  His relationship with abolitionists, with African-Americans, with Members of Congress, these are all affecting Lincoln’s view, so you’ve got to step out from Lincoln to look at the broad picture of 19th century America, and that’s what we try to in this book.  Lincoln is still central but it’s Lincoln as a man of his era, not just Lincoln pulled out of context as some kind of, you know, icon without history.

Question: How did you select which scholars to feature?

Foner:    I chose people for this book some of whom as I say have never written about Lincoln.  Sean Wilentz, for example, who’s a scholar at Princeton, who wrote a very [fine] book a couple of years ago on the rise of American democracy.  Lincoln comes in at the end, but he wrote an essay for this about Lincoln and democracy.  You can’t understand him until you… You know, you can’t write about that unless you think about the whole trend of democratic expansion and democratic exclusion in the 19th century.  Or, again, James McPherson, who has written a lot about the Civil War, very, very fine scholar of the Civil War, he wrote about Lincoln and his role as Commander in Chief of the Army.  But, again, you know, and by the way, of course, very relevant today, what is the role of the president in setting military strategy in trying to, you know, relate to members of the Army, you know, leaders of the Army.  Does the president just [defer] to them?  Does he try to give them strategic insight, etc.?  My own essay is actually about Lincoln and his plan which he held to for much of his life to try to, in the phrase of the 19th century, colonize emancipated slaves, that is, send them out of the country to somewhere else.  For most of his life, Lincoln could not really think of this as a biracial society.  He thought of black people as alien, as somehow not really assimilable.  He felt racism was deeply embedded in American life.  He thought the best thing for emancipated slaves will be to send them somewhere else, whether Africa, Central America where they can have their own national identity.  And that’s not something most writers about Lincoln emphasize, but that was an important feature of his outlook for a long, long time.  And, again, to understand that, you have to understand how widely shared this view of colonizing blacks or separating the races was in that period.

The author shares how he went about writing Lincoln’s narrative.

Related Articles

Major study: Drug overdoses over a 38-year period reveal hidden trends

It's just the current cycle that involves opiates, but methamphetamine, cocaine, and others have caused the trajectory of overdoses to head the same direction

From the study: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6408/eaau1184
Surprising Science
  • It appears that overdoses are increasing exponentially, no matter the drug itself
  • If the study bears out, it means that even reducing opiates will not slow the trajectory.
  • The causes of these trends remain obscure, but near the end of the write-up about the study, a hint might be apparent
Keep reading Show less

Why "nuclear pasta" is the strongest material in the universe

Through computationally intensive computer simulations, researchers have discovered that "nuclear pasta," found in the crusts of neutron stars, is the strongest material in the universe.

Accretion disk surrounding a neutron star. Credit: NASA
Surprising Science
  • The strongest material in the universe may be the whimsically named "nuclear pasta."
  • You can find this substance in the crust of neutron stars.
  • This amazing material is super-dense, and is 10 billion times harder to break than steel.

Superman is known as the "Man of Steel" for his strength and indestructibility. But the discovery of a new material that's 10 billion times harder to break than steel begs the question—is it time for a new superhero known as "Nuclear Pasta"? That's the name of the substance that a team of researchers thinks is the strongest known material in the universe.

Unlike humans, when stars reach a certain age, they do not just wither and die, but they explode, collapsing into a mass of neurons. The resulting space entity, known as a neutron star, is incredibly dense. So much so that previous research showed that the surface of a such a star would feature amazingly strong material. The new research, which involved the largest-ever computer simulations of a neutron star's crust, proposes that "nuclear pasta," the material just under the surface, is actually stronger.

The competition between forces from protons and neutrons inside a neutron star create super-dense shapes that look like long cylinders or flat planes, referred to as "spaghetti" and "lasagna," respectively. That's also where we get the overall name of nuclear pasta.

Caplan & Horowitz/arXiv

Diagrams illustrating the different types of so-called nuclear pasta.

The researchers' computer simulations needed 2 million hours of processor time before completion, which would be, according to a press release from McGill University, "the equivalent of 250 years on a laptop with a single good GPU." Fortunately, the researchers had access to a supercomputer, although it still took a couple of years. The scientists' simulations consisted of stretching and deforming the nuclear pasta to see how it behaved and what it would take to break it.

While they were able to discover just how strong nuclear pasta seems to be, no one is holding their breath that we'll be sending out missions to mine this substance any time soon. Instead, the discovery has other significant applications.

One of the study's co-authors, Matthew Caplan, a postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University, said the neutron stars would be "a hundred trillion times denser than anything on earth." Understanding what's inside them would be valuable for astronomers because now only the outer layer of such starts can be observed.

"A lot of interesting physics is going on here under extreme conditions and so understanding the physical properties of a neutron star is a way for scientists to test their theories and models," Caplan added. "With this result, many problems need to be revisited. How large a mountain can you build on a neutron star before the crust breaks and it collapses? What will it look like? And most importantly, how can astronomers observe it?"

Another possibility worth studying is that, due to its instability, nuclear pasta might generate gravitational waves. It may be possible to observe them at some point here on Earth by utilizing very sensitive equipment.

The team of scientists also included A. S. Schneider from California Institute of Technology and C. J. Horowitz from Indiana University.

Check out the study "The elasticity of nuclear pasta," published in Physical Review Letters.


How a huge, underwater wall could save melting Antarctic glaciers

Scientists think constructing a miles-long wall along an ice shelf in Antarctica could help protect the world's largest glacier from melting.

Image: NASA
Surprising Science
  • Rising ocean levels are a serious threat to coastal regions around the globe.
  • Scientists have proposed large-scale geoengineering projects that would prevent ice shelves from melting.
  • The most successful solution proposed would be a miles-long, incredibly tall underwater wall at the edge of the ice shelves.

The world's oceans will rise significantly over the next century if the massive ice shelves connected to Antarctica begin to fail as a result of global warming.

To prevent or hold off such a catastrophe, a team of scientists recently proposed a radical plan: build underwater walls that would either support the ice or protect it from warm waters.

In a paper published in The Cryosphere, Michael Wolovick and John Moore from Princeton and the Beijing Normal University, respectively, outlined several "targeted geoengineering" solutions that could help prevent the melting of western Antarctica's Florida-sized Thwaites Glacier, whose melting waters are projected to be the largest source of sea-level rise in the foreseeable future.

An "unthinkable" engineering project

"If [glacial geoengineering] works there then we would expect it to work on less challenging glaciers as well," the authors wrote in the study.

One approach involves using sand or gravel to build artificial mounds on the seafloor that would help support the glacier and hopefully allow it to regrow. In another strategy, an underwater wall would be built to prevent warm waters from eating away at the glacier's base.

The most effective design, according to the team's computer simulations, would be a miles-long and very tall wall, or "artificial sill," that serves as a "continuous barrier" across the length of the glacier, providing it both physical support and protection from warm waters. Although the study authors suggested this option is currently beyond any engineering feat humans have attempted, it was shown to be the most effective solution in preventing the glacier from collapsing.

Source: Wolovick et al.

An example of the proposed geoengineering project. By blocking off the warm water that would otherwise eat away at the glacier's base, further sea level rise might be preventable.

But other, more feasible options could also be effective. For example, building a smaller wall that blocks about 50% of warm water from reaching the glacier would have about a 70% chance of preventing a runaway collapse, while constructing a series of isolated, 1,000-foot-tall columns on the seafloor as supports had about a 30% chance of success.

Still, the authors note that the frigid waters of the Antarctica present unprecedently challenging conditions for such an ambitious geoengineering project. They were also sure to caution that their encouraging results shouldn't be seen as reasons to neglect other measures that would cut global emissions or otherwise combat climate change.

"There are dishonest elements of society that will try to use our research to argue against the necessity of emissions' reductions. Our research does not in any way support that interpretation," they wrote.

"The more carbon we emit, the less likely it becomes that the ice sheets will survive in the long term at anything close to their present volume."

A 2015 report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine illustrates the potentially devastating effects of ice-shelf melting in western Antarctica.

"As the oceans and atmosphere warm, melting of ice shelves in key areas around the edges of the Antarctic ice sheet could trigger a runaway collapse process known as Marine Ice Sheet Instability. If this were to occur, the collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) could potentially contribute 2 to 4 meters (6.5 to 13 feet) of global sea level rise within just a few centuries."