Does Latin America get enough coverage in The New Yorker?

Question: Does Latin America get enough coverage in The New Yorker?

David Remnick: I think Latin America is the place that’s probably gone with far less coverage than I’d like to see. And the answer to that is very simple. My editorship has almost completely overlapped with 2001 and after September 11th. And so, if our foreign coverage, which I think is more now in the last six, seven years than it’s ever been.

But if we can be faulted for anything, it’s an understandable, I think, obsession with the Middle East, South Asia, China. I’d like to see even more on China.  And Venezuela is an exception. But we certainly haven’t paid enough attention to Chile, Argentina, Mexico, and I’d like to see that corrected. But there’s a reason for it.


Recorded on Jan 7, 2008

Remnick's tenure happened to coincide with 9/11 and the subsequent fall out.

Related Articles

A controversial theory claims past, present, and future exist at the same time

Our experience of time may be blinding us to its true nature, say scientists.

Back to the Future.
Surprising Science
  • Time may not be passing at all, says the Block Universe Theory.
  • Time travel may be possible.
  • Your perception of time is likely relative to you and limited.
Keep reading Show less

Six disastrous encounters with the world’s most hostile uncontacted tribe

From questionable shipwrecks to outright attacks, they clearly don't want to be bothered.

Culture & Religion
  • Many have tried to contact the Sentinelese, to write about them, or otherwise.
  • But the inhabitants of the 23 square mile island in the Bay of Bengal don't want anything to do with the outside world.
  • Their numbers are unknown, but either 40 or 500 remain.
Keep reading Show less