Daniel Dennett Explains His Book 'Breaking the Spell'

Question: What was the fundamental message of the book?

Dennett:    I think the most important thing I wanted them to take from the book is that, every big problem that we face in the 21st century has a religious dimension that is to say, whether it is energy or social justice or global warming or poverty or water.  If we try to solve these problems without dealing with the religions and the religious aspirations and fears and hopes of the people involve.  We will probably come up with the wrong solutions to those problems and so we need to understand religion in the same way we need to understand the climate and energy and water if because good intentions aren’t enough we have to deal intelligently and with knowledge about this phenomena and so we should, we should study religion much more intensively so that we don’t blow it.  

Daniel Dennett Explains His Book 'Breaking the Spell'.

Adam Gopnik on the rhinoceros of liberalism vs. the unicorns of everything else

Torn between absolutism on the left and the right, classical liberalism—with its core values of compassion and incremental progress whereby the once-radical becomes the mainstream—is in need of a good defense. And Adam Gopnik is its lawyer.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Liberalism as "radical pragmatism"
  • Intersectionality and civic discourse
  • How "a thousand small sanities" tackled drunk driving, normalized gay marriage, and could control gun violence
Keep reading Show less

Why the south of Westeros is the north of Ireland

As Game of Thrones ends, a revealing resolution to its perplexing geography.

Image: YouTube / Doosh
Strange Maps
  • The fantasy world of Game of Thrones was inspired by real places and events.
  • But the map of Westeros is a good example of the perplexing relation between fantasy and reality.
  • Like Britain, it has a Wall in the North, but the map only really clicks into place if you add Ireland.
Keep reading Show less

Fascism and conspiracy theories: The symptoms of broken communication

The lost practice of face-to-face communication has made the world a more extreme place.

Videos
  • The world was saner when we spoke face-to-face, argues John Cameron Mitchell. Not looking someone in the eye when you talk to them raises the potential for miscommunication and conflict.
  • Social media has been an incredible force for activism and human rights, but it's also negatively affected our relationship with the media. We are now bombarded 24/7 with news that either drives us to anger or apathy.
  • Sitting behind a screen makes polarization worse, and polarization is fertile ground for conspiracy theories and fascism, which Cameron describes as irrationally blaming someone else for your problems.
Keep reading Show less