from the world's big
Collaborate With Your Competitors
Daniel Shapiro, Ph.D., is a world-renowned expert on negotiation and conflict resolution. He founded and directs the Harvard International Negotiation Program, which has pioneered innovative strategies and teaching methodologies to address the human dimensions of conflict resolution. Dr. Shapiro also is an associate professor in psychology at Harvard Medical School/McLean Hospital and affiliated faculty at Harvard Law School’s Program on Negotiation, where he serves as the associate director of the Harvard Negotiation Project. For three years, he chaired the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Conflict Prevention.
He has launched back-channel negotiations to help revitalize formal peace negotiations in a major Middle East conflict, and regularly conducts negotiation trainings for government leaders around the world—including Middle East negotiators, Chinese officials, Serbian members of parliament, and senior U.S. officials. Through nonprofit funding, he developed a conflict management program that now reaches one million youth across more than thirty countries.
He has appeared on dozens of radio and television shows and has contributed to The New York Times, O, The Oprah Magazine, and other popular publications. Dr. Shapiro is the recipient of numerous awards, including the American Psychological Association’s Early Career Award and the Cloke-Millen Peacemaker of the Year Award. The World Economic Forum named him a “Young Global Leader.” In his spare time, he plays blues guitar and enjoys playing baseball with his three sports-loving sons.
Dan Shapiro: There are two sides to your business operation. One side is the bottom line; it’s the facts, the figures, making some sort of profit revenue and so on. But just as important to business and perhaps in some ways, arguably, more important to the modern business is dealing effectively with the emotional side of negotiation, cultivating within your organization a positive sensibility towards your organization.
I was in conversation with someone with HR recently, a leader from HR, who said, “Look, most products these days can be replicated within some three, six months. Not much time at all.” So what is your greatest asset these days as an organization? It’s not the product. It is your ability to deal well with people, both in your organization and with other organizations. And the question then is, how can you do that most effectively? There’s a science to help you out. And we’ve tried to break down a lot of that science.
Putting aside legal questions, you know, if there are ways that organizations can work effectively together, sometimes they’re resigned to actually do so. They think that, by working together, we are going to undercut our independent success, we’re going to give more to our competitor and the gain to our side’s going to be worse than it could be. So let’s not cooperate with the other side at all. . . .
I’d like to make a distinction between two different things: the skills of negotiation and the strategy of your organization. In terms of the skills of your organization, any and every organization will benefit if your employees are trained in negotiation and conflict resolution. It is one of the greatest costs to an organization, the inability for people to deal well with their differences and, just as true, it’s one of the easiest things to actually bring and train in the organization. So on the one side, train everybody in the skills. And if two leading organizations want to cooperate in terms of training your employees in negotiation, great. Send them to a university; send them to a private firm. There will be net gain for everybody. You’re still going to be competing, but there’s net gain for everybody.
The other side of this coin is about the strategy of your competitive advantage, your competitive edge. I would not recommend you, as you’re in the midst of this negotiation training, to share your trade secrets with the other side. You don’t need to. You don’t want to. if I’m negotiating with someone else and there’s certain overlapping interests -- we have certain reasons where we’re motivated to work together and yet there’s certain areas where we feel fear in sharing information -- what do you do in those kinds of situations? Do you just avoid working with the other side altogether? . . . If there’s a way that you can work collaboratively, meeting your interests or dovetailing your differing interests, do it, but do it wisely.
Before you start that negotiation process, defining your roles of interaction together, bring your own team back, by itself, and ask one simple set of questions: What information do we definitely feel comfortable sharing with the other side? What information might we want to share with the other side? And what are the secrets, the trade secrets, the internal operational issues that we definitely don’t want to share with the other side? That simple piece of preparation can save you a lot of grief and can help you and your full team feel comfortable as you’re negotiating with the other side.
And one of the most dangerous places -- and I’ve seen this happen -- is where you have a team of negotiators walking in to negotiate with the other side, they have not had that conversation in advance. One person says, “Oh, oh, well we could give, you know, an additional $50 million on this contract.” And John or Sally, right, on their own team, looks at them and goes, “What did you just say?” Differences about what information to communicate. If they had spent that five or ten or 30 minutes before preparing -- what information do we definitely want to communicate, might we, don’t we want to communicate? -- they would have been in a much stronger negotiating position.
Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd
Today's companies need to learn urgently how to cultivate a collaborative, high-EQ environment -- if they want to remain competitive, says Shapiro.
Join multiple Tony and Emmy Award-winning actress Judith Light live on Big Think at 2 pm ET on Monday.
A new study looks at what would happen to human language on a long journey to other star systems.
- A new study proposes that language could change dramatically on long space voyages.
- Spacefaring people might lose the ability to understand the people of Earth.
- This scenario is of particular concern for potential "generation ships".
Generation Ships<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a1e6445c7168d293a6da3f9600f534a2"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H2f0Wd3zNj0?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Many of the most popular apps are about self-improvement.
Emotions are the newest hot commodity, and we can't get enough.
Construction of the $500 billion dollar tech city-state of the future is moving ahead.
- The futuristic megacity Neom is being built in Saudi Arabia.
- The city will be fully automated, leading in health, education and quality of life.
- It will feature an artificial moon, cloud seeding, robotic gladiators and flying taxis.
The Red Sea area where Neom will be built:
Saudi Arabia Plans Futuristic City, "Neom" (Full Promotional Video)<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="c646d528d230c1bf66c75422bc4ccf6f"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/N53DzL3_BHA?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Frequent shopping for single items adds to our carbon footprint.
- A new study shows e-commerce sites like Amazon leave larger greenhouse gas footprints than retail stores.
- Ordering online from retail stores has an even smaller footprint than going to the store yourself.
- Greening efforts by major e-commerce sites won't curb wasteful consumer habits. Consolidating online orders can make a difference.
A pile of recycled cardboard sits on the ground at Recology's Recycle Central on January 4, 2018 in San Francisco, California.
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images<p>A large part of the reason is speed. In a competitive market, pure players use the equation, <em>speed + convenience</em>, to drive adoption. This is especially relevant to the "last mile" GHG footprint: the distance between the distribution center and the consumer.</p><p>Interestingly, the smallest GHG footprint occurs when you order directly from a physical store—even smaller than going there yourself. Pure players, such as Amazon, are the greatest offenders. Variables like geographic location matter; the team looked at shopping in the UK, the US, China, and the Netherlands. </p><p>Sadegh Shahmohammadi, a PhD student at the Netherlands' Radboud University and corresponding author of the paper, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/tech/greenhouse-gas-emissions-retail/index.html" target="_blank">says</a> the above "pattern holds true in countries where people mostly drive. It really depends on the country and consumer behavior there."</p><p>The researchers write that this year-and-a-half long study pushes back on previous research that claims online shopping to be better in terms of GHG footprints.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"They have, however, compared the GHG emissions per shopping event and did not consider the link between the retail channels and the basket size, which leads to a different conclusion than that of the current study."</p><p>Online retail is where convenience trumps environment: people tend to order one item at a time when shopping on pure player sites, whereas they stock up on multiple items when visiting a store. Consumers will sometimes order a number of separate items over the course of a week rather than making one trip to purchase everything they need. </p><p>While greening efforts by online retailers are important, until a shift in consumer attitude changes, the current carbon footprint will be a hard obstacle to overcome. Amazon is trying to have it both ways—carbon-free and convenience addicted—and the math isn't adding up. If you need to order things, do it online, but try to consolidate your purchases as much as possible.</p><p>--</p><p><em>Stay in touch with Derek on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/derekberes" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DerekBeresdotcom" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and <a href="https://derekberes.substack.com/" target="_blank">Substack</a>. His next book is</em> "<em>Hero's Dose: The Case For Psychedelics in Ritual and Therapy."</em></p>