Changing the Way We Shop

Question: What will the new consumer look like?
\r\n

\r\nJuliet Schor:
\r\nI the book I have some pretty astounding new numbers on what I call the \r\n"fast fashion cycle"—the way which consumers have increased the rate at \r\nwhich they acquire new goods and then discard them.  And that, of \r\ncourse, was a predictable result of an economy of lots of cheap imports,\r\n artificially cheap energy, again. And that’s something which, that’s a \r\nlifestyle that in some ways... that’s a lifestyle that really has been \r\nstopped dead in its tracks since the recession.  And many people have \r\nsort of permanently changed the way they think about consuming as a \r\nresult of having gone bankrupt, or racked up large credit card debts \r\nthat they now are not sure that they are going to be able to pay, lost \r\ntheir homes, had the trauma of unemployment, all of those things have \r\nhad a profound impact on a big swath of American public who are not much\r\n more interested in saving then they spending for the first time and \r\nhave really made changes in their consumer patterns that look like \r\nthey’re going to stick at least for a while. 

If we think about \r\nhow you can have a satisfying consumer life in this new world, there are\r\n two things that really stand out.  One is: if you’re going to buy \r\nsomething, buy for durability both because it’s ecologically much \r\nbetter, but also because in the long run it will probably cost you less \r\nif you can buy something and keep it for a long time. 

The \r\nsecond is that we’re going to see a switch from such a heavy emphasis on\r\n buying new to much more of a balance between buying things new and \r\nbuying them used.  This is a trend that actually started, of course, \r\nbefore the recession, in part because people were buying so many things,\r\n there’s so much used stuff around, whether we’re talking about clothes,\r\n or furniture or electronics or pretty much you name it in the consumer \r\ngoods area.  There are growing inventories of used goods which the \r\noriginal purchasers don’t want, and now we have lots of ways of \r\nexchanging amongst ourselves, whether it’s eBay or Craig’s List or Free \r\nCycle or swap meets or Share This Stuff, a whole range of specialized \r\nWeb sites that allow people to get rid of things they don’t want and \r\nother people to acquire them.  And then all the face-to-face places in \r\nwhich we do this too. 

\r\nSo, the sort of economies of reuse and exchange are growing rapidly and I\r\n think will become a more permanent feature of our consumer \r\nenvironment.  And that means, if you love to shop, you can do it \r\nwithout, you know, putting too much pressure on your pocketbook, or on \r\nthe planet.  If you love to buy stuff and get rid of it, you can do it \r\nand then the key thing really from a financial and ecological point of \r\nview is how much new – how many new consumer goods do you buy?  If we \r\nshift the balance there, because of course, the used stuff is so much \r\nless expensive, we can, I think accommodate both the, you know, \r\nshopaholics as well as the planet and our pocketbooks.

Recorded\r\n on June 2, 2010
Interviewed by Jessica Liebman

The economies of reuse and exchange will become a more permanent feature of our consumer environment.

Calling out Cersei Lannister: Elizabeth Warren reviews Game of Thrones

The real Game of Thrones might be who best leverages the hit HBO show to shape political narratives.

Photo credit: Mario Tama / Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren argues that Game of Thrones is primarily about women in her review of the wildly popular HBO show.
  • Warren also touches on other parallels between the show and our modern world, such as inequality, political favoritism of the elite, and the dire impact of different leadership styles on the lives of the people.
  • Her review serves as another example of using Game of Thrones as a political analogy and a tool for framing political narratives.
Keep reading Show less

'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
  • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
  • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
Keep reading Show less
Videos
  • Climate change is no longer a financial problem, just a political one.
  • Mitigating climate change by decarbonizing our economy would add trillions of dollars in new investments.
  • Public attitudes toward climate change have shifted steadily in favor of action. Now it's up to elected leaders.