Can technology increase political participation?

Matt Bai:Well I don’t know that you harness technology. I think technology often harnesses you. And technology is gonna change politics whether we like it or not. And maybe it’s too much to expect that we can sort of get ahead of the curve. But I’m really excited about this. I mean I’m excited about the whole moment. I’m very optimistic about it, and I think . . . Look I think the trend . . . To be very philosophical about it, I do believe . . . maybe it sounds jinglistic, but the trend of all humanity is moving toward . . . is always evolving toward personal freedom and personal liberty. I think that’s what makes the American ideal so vital, is because I do think it represents the sort of political evolution of humankind in a way in this moment. I think it will be remembered that way as long as people are walking the planet, no matter what happens. And so you know to me this technological revolution where people can engage on a personal level and customize their lives and their options; and work at home if we can make that possible for people; and be around their children; and telecommute; and all the things that this technology makes possible is incredibly exciting. And it certainly has that effect, you know, potentially in the political realm. I mean I . . . in my lifetime people will vote online. I believe that. I don’t see . . . The arguments are so silly. “Well it’s not secure.” Well you know how many things I buy on the Internet with my credit card? I mean I guess you could argue that your vote is much more important than your credit card. It is. But if we can make that secure, certainly we can make voting reasonably secure. And so you know I think that . . . And I think we’ll have greater communication between . . . hopefully between our leaders and our people because they’re able to make themselves heard, and there’s . . . you can communicate so much more easily. So I think the process is gonna change in ways we can’t imagine.

Recorded on: 12/13/07

 

Technology is going to change politics whether we like it or not.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

10 books to check out from Jordan Peterson's 'Great Books' list

The Canadian professor has an extensive collection posted on his site.

Jordan Peterson with Carl Jung and the cover art of Jaak Panksepp's 'Affective Neuroscience' (Image: Chris Williamson/Getty Images/Big Think)
Personal Growth
  • Peterson's Great Books list features classics by Orwell, Jung, Huxley, and Dostoevsky.
  • Categories include literature, neuroscience, religion, and systems analysis.
  • Having recently left Patreon for "freedom of speech" reasons, Peterson is taking direct donations through Paypal (and Bitcoin).
Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

Should you invest in China's stock market? Know this one thing first.

Despite incredible economic growth, it is not necessarily an investor's paradise.

Videos
  • China's stock market is just 27 years old. It's economy has grown 30x over that time.
  • Imagine if you had invested early and gotten in on the ground floor.
  • Actually, you would have lost money. Here's how that's possible.