Bitcoin 101, with Daniel Altman
Daniel Altman is Big Think's Chief Economist and an adjunct faculty member at New York University's Stern School of Business. Daniel wrote economic commentary for The Economist, The New York Times, and The International Herald Tribune before founding North Yard Economics, a non-profit consulting firm serving developing countries, in 2008. In between, he served as an economic advisor in the British government and wrote four books, most recently Outrageous Fortunes: The Twelve Surprising Trends That Will Reshape the Global Economy.
Daniel Altman: It’s been a big year for bitcoin, the virtual currency. This is the currency which only has value because people want to use it. They want to trade it so that they can buy things online, buy things perhaps in private settings and so they can hold onto it because they expect it will gain value into the future. It’s a currency that has been controversial because one of its exchanges broke down recently with the possible loss of millions of dollars for people who thought they had bitcoins that may have been stolen. But it’s also been controversial because of legal issues, how will certain entities allow it to be traded. Will there be tracking of bitcoins, is it something that will remain truly private in the future. Now bitcoin over the past year has seen a lot of volatility in its value in part because of some of these controversial events and in part because there’s been more knowledge of bitcoin and that has spurred more demand that people want to hold this thing as a currency or perhaps as an investment. And the fact is because it’s so volatile and because there’s a possibility that many other virtual currencies will enter the market and compete with bitcoin, you have to think about it perhaps more like an investment as well as a currency than you would with something like dollars.
Dollars, yes. If you hold on to them they lose value relative to inflation as prices go up. But it’s fairly stable and you know that you’ll be able to use dollars in the future. Bitcoin is a little riskier because we don’t know exactly what the demand for bitcoins will be in the future and there’s the possibility that we will run out of new bitcoins. There’s supposed to be a finite number out there. If that number is reached and no more bitcoins are created then essentially individuals will have the power to make monetary policy for the entire bitcoin market by either hoarding bitcoins to contract the money supply or pushing their bitcoins out into the market to expand it. Now this is something that we rarely see in regular currency markets because individuals don’t have that much power. But it is something that could possibly happen in the bitcoin market in the future. Now if you’re considering buying bitcoins I think the right way to think about it is something like investing in fine wines or expensive musical instruments or paintings. It’s something that you wouldn’t want to do unless you really knew a lot about what was going on in that market and the underlying value of these things and how it was created. So I would say bitcoin can be a fun experiment. It can be something that you want to invest time in as well as money but perhaps not just for the dilettantes, especially because there’s so much uncertainty surrounding its value in the future.
Directed/Produced by Jonathan Fowler and Dillon Fitton
Economist Daniel Altman explains the decentralized virtual currency Bitcoin.
Giving our solar system a "slap in the face."
- A stream of galactic debris is hurtling at us, pulling dark matter along with it
- It's traveling so quickly it's been described as a hurricane of dark matter
- Scientists are excited to set their particle detectors at the onslffaught
Two massive clouds of dust in orbit around the Earth have been discussed for years and finally proven to exist.
- Hungarian astronomers have proven the existence of two "pseudo-satellites" in orbit around the earth.
- These dust clouds were first discovered in the sixties, but are so difficult to spot that scientists have debated their existence since then.
- The findings may be used to decide where to put satellites in the future and will have to be considered when interplanetary space missions are undertaken.
Once again, our circadian rhythm points the way.
- Seven individuals were locked inside a windowless, internetless room for 37 days.
- While at rest, they burned 130 more calories at 5 p.m. than at 5 a.m.
- Morning time again shown not to be the best time to eat.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.