Bill Richardson: If you were President, would you have called the Annapolis Conference?
Bill Richardson is the Governor of New Mexico and former candidate for the 2008 Democratic nomination. Of Hispanic descent, Richardson was born in Pasadena, California, but spent most of his childhood in Mexico City. Richardson graduated from Tufts University, from which he also received a Masters in International Affairs. In 1982, Richardson was elected to the United States House of Representatives. During his time in the House, Richardson focused on foreign affairs as well as on issues of importance to the Native American community. In 1997, Bill Clinton appointed Richardson United States Ambassador to the United Nations; Richardson left that post in 1998 to become Secretary of Energy. Richardson is known for his "shuttle diplomacy" and has been nominated five times for the Nobel Peace Prize. Richardson was first elected the Governor of New Mexico in 2003; he was reelected in 2007 in a landslide, earning 69% of the vote. Richardson is the author of two recent books: the campaign autobiography Between Worlds: The Making of an American Life, and Leading by Example: How We Can Inspire an Energy and Security Revolution.
Bill Richardson: Yes, but President Bush has waited seven years, and it may be too late. But it’s good to get people together in a room. I’ve always believed that you gotta negotiate your differences. Finally they invited Syria to participate, but much too late. I would have been talking to Syria earlier. But what is important is to realize that resolving the Israeli-Palestinian issue or making it less tense helps us try to deal with Iran, with the Iraq war. And what I believe is healthy is that if we can establish certain principles in the Middle East peace negotiations, like preserving Israel’s security; along with creating a Palestinian state; and then dealing with the outlines of the 67 borders; and then dealing also with the Jerusalem situation with the status of Palestinian refugees, but at the same time providing Israel a sense of security that it won’t be attacked, and that America will stand with our traditional relationship with it; and then you couple that with an effort by the United States to connect again with the Islamic world with many countries that are moderate Arabs, that are not jihadist terrorists. Because what we do need to do in our foreign policy is build international support against international terrorism, against those jihadists that do want to harm. My intensity in trying to bring a solution. My worry is in the Annapolis Conference that the President and Secretary Rice have said okay, these are the outlines, so you guys work it out. It’s not gonna happen unless America plays the role of honest broker; pushes both sides; builds coalitions; brings Syria in; brings Iran in; tries to resolve the Iraq war. But just getting back to the Israeli-Palestinian issue, the Annapolis Conference . . . my worry is that President Bush is gonna say okay, I’ve outlined the basis for peace. We’ve said that we’re gonna have a conclusion by 2008, and you guys are on your own. I would personally engage. I would spend my personal time. If I were President Bush, I would have been in Annapolis every second to try to find ways not just to produce a document that says our goal is to create peace, but to start looking at the potential outlines, ‘cause I believe there’s some potential areas of agreement there that if we can at least secure them early, you’re moving in the right direction and you’re lessening the tension. And you’re isolating the Hamaases and the terrorist elements that exist in the Middle East today.
Recorded on: 11/20/07
Bush waited seven years too many, Richardson says.
These five main food groups are important for your brain's health and likely to boost the production of feel-good chemicals.
We all know eating “healthy” food is good for our physical health and can decrease our risk of developing diabetes, cancer, obesity and heart disease. What is not as well known is that eating healthy food is also good for our mental health and can decrease our risk of depression and anxiety.
Infographics show the classes and anxieties in the supposedly classless U.S. economy.
For those of us who follow politics, we’re used to commentators referring to the President’s low approval rating as a surprise given the U.S.'s “booming” economy. This seeming disconnect, however, should really prompt us to reconsider the measurements by which we assess the health of an economy. With a robust U.S. stock market and GDP and low unemployment figures, it’s easy to see why some think all is well. But looking at real U.S. wages, which have remained stagnant—and have, thus, in effect gone down given rising costs from inflation—a very different picture emerges. For the 1%, the economy is booming. For the rest of us, it’s hard to even know where we stand. A recent study by Porch (a home-improvement company) of blue-collar vs. white-collar workers shows how traditional categories are becoming less distinct—the study references "new-collar" workers, who require technical certifications but not college degrees. And a set of recent infographics from CreditLoan capturing the thoughts of America’s middle class as defined by the Pew Research Center shows how confused we are.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.