Barry Nalebuff on the History of Game Theory

Question: What is Game Theory?

Barry Nalebuff: Game theory is a science of strategy. It’s anticipating how others will respond to what you are doing and realizing that you can actually change what they are doing.

In Physics, there’s the Third Law: For every action, there is a reaction equal and opposite. But in game theory, you could influence what the other person’s reaction is. It’s not programmed. You can change it.

Question: What is the history of game theory?

Barry Nalebuff: Since game theory is a science of strategy, and people have been thinking strategically forever, you can go back to the Peloponnesian War.

But I think, as a real science, in terms of being mathematized, being formalized, it goes back to Von Neumann and Morgenstern and really just about 55 years ago. It was during the war [i.e. WWII], in terms of thinking about how to locate enemy submarines and the cat and mouse game is where it began.

It started really with zero sum games, the notion that, I’ll find your sub, I’ll destroy you before you destroy me. So one person wins and one person losses.

Then John Nash, who later became famous with “A Beautiful Mind,” created the next important development, which is cooperative games; understanding that games don’t have to be just be zero sum. He gave us the concept of, what’s now called Nash equilibrium, basically a resting point for a game. A place where what I’m doing is best, given what I think you’re doing. And what you are doing is best, given what you believe that I’m doing.

And, one, it wasn’t clear that games all have such a resting point. And he showed that pretty much they do, though not always in something called the pure strategies, or a fixed strategy, like sometimes in football or in tennis I’ll [IB] your forehand or backhand or I have to bluff.

But when you allow that type of general strategies, then Nash showed that each game does have such a happy end point.

It is important to remember actually that solution to the game isn’t always a good solution. So just because people are happy with what they are doing, doesn’t mean it’s good for society.

Recorded on: Oct 2, 2008

 

Barry Nalebuff explains the basis of Game Theory.

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

Sponsored
  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Why a federal judge ordered White House to restore Jim Acosta's press badge

A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration likely violated the reporter's Fifth Amendment rights when it stripped his press credentials earlier this month.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 16: CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta (R) returns to the White House with CNN Washington bureau chief Sam Feist after Federal judge Timothy J. Kelly ordered the White House to reinstate his press pass November 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. CNN has filed a lawsuit against the White House after Acosta's press pass was revoked after a dispute involving a news conference last week. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Acosta will be allowed to return to the White House on Friday.
  • The judge described the ruling as narrow, and didn't rule one way or the other on violations of the First Amendment.
  • The case is still open, and the administration may choose to appeal the ruling.
Keep reading Show less