At What Price Justice?

Question: Does a large monetary settlement really translate \r\ninto justice?

Gloria Allred:  Well, in many cases \r\nthere is no justice. There's just minimizing the injustice. We're \r\nmitigating the injustice. For example, if a woman has been raped or \r\nbattered, you can't undo the rape and you can't do the battery, the \r\nbruises, the broken arm, the other injuries that may have been inflicted\r\n upon her. But what you can do is try to minimize the injustice by \r\nwinning her compensation and sometimes criminal prosecution as well for \r\nthe wrong that has been done to her, civilly and sometimes criminally.

It's\r\n all about accountability, and imposing appropriate consequences for the\r\n person and on the person who has inflicted the wrong and the harm, and \r\nthe damage. For me, it's all about winning whatever it is my client is \r\nseeking that is possible in the legal system. We do not live in an ideal\r\n world. We live in a world that is somewhat flawed and we work in a \r\nflawed justice system. Having said that we want to win as much justice \r\nor minimize the injustice to the fullest extent possible.
\r\nSo in some cases that means criminal prosecution and civil settlement. \r\nSometimes it's just civil settlement but I would like to win whatever \r\nand whenever it is possible to do so, as much justice as the system can \r\nafford.

Do large monetary settlements \r\nactually serve as a deterrent for crime?

Gloria Allred:\r\n I do think it has an educational impact. Having to reach into one's \r\nwallet and pay out a large amount because of the wrong that one has done\r\n definitely makes one think about whether one wants to do this again to \r\nsomeone else, because there is a cost to inflicting wrongs.  The real \r\nquestion is who should bear the cost of the wrong?  I say it should not \r\nbe the victim, should be the wrongdoer.  And that's the message I'm \r\ntrying to send.  So for example in many cases involving sexual \r\nharassment—that's mainly what we do is plaintiff sexual harassment for \r\nindividuals who have been sexually harassed. Then, you know, we want the\r\n full measure of damages that is possible under the law from the sexual \r\nharasser and/or those who might have condoned or encouraged that sexual \r\nharassment.  Because sexual harassment is a barrier to the enjoyment of \r\nequal employment opportunity. So, for example, a woman who is sexually \r\nharass in a workplace is going to have to battle that... fight that. If \r\nshe says, yes to the sexual harassment because she's afraid she'll lose \r\nher job if she doesn't, then she's in a no-win situation. If she says \r\nno, then she's in a no-win situation. It's not fair. It's not right and \r\nit's against the law. So we want to get her compensation so she can go \r\non with her life and be free of that barrier of sexual harassment.
\r\nWe've done child sexual abuse cases, we've been able to get the abusers \r\nprosecuted—the child molesters prosecuted. And also sometimes filed \r\ncivil lawsuits against them resulting in very significant damages that \r\nhave to be paid to the victim of child sexual abuse. Same with rapists \r\nand others who have inflicted wrongs against women and children.

Recorded on June 9, 2010
Interviewed by David Hirschman

"In many cases there is no justice; there's just minimizing the injustice," says the lawyer. Doing so to the tune of many millions of dollars can have an "educational impact," she says.

Related Articles

Scientists discover what caused the worst mass extinction ever

How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.

Credit: Ron Miller
Surprising Science

While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.

Keep reading Show less

Why we're so self-critical of ourselves after meeting someone new

A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.

New acquaintances probably like you more than you think. (Photo by Simone Joyner/Getty Images)
Surprising Science

We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.

Keep reading Show less

NASA launches ICESat-2 into orbit to track ice changes in Antarctica and Greenland

Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.

Firing three pairs of laser beams 10,000 times per second, the ICESat-2 satellite will measure how long it takes for faint reflections to bounce back from ground and sea ice, allowing scientists to measure the thickness, elevation and extent of global ice

Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).

Keep reading Show less