Andrew Ross Sorkin On The Credit Crisis

Question: Are the CEOS of banks to blame?

 

Andrew Ross Sorkin: Well, I would think that there should be-- that the CEOs of most of these banks bear an enormous responsibility. You asked if there should be greater consequence. Some would argue there's already been that consequence in that I think if you look Chuck Prince who ran Citigroup doesn’t run Citigroup anymore. Stan O'Neil who ran Merrill Lynch doesn’t run Merrill Lynch anymore. Jimmy Cane who ran Bear Stearns doesn’t run Bear Stearns anymore. So some of that consequence has already taken place and often the consequence beyond that has taken place in their wallet frankly, because beyond losing their job, their stock is worth a lot less. I think you will probably see more people lose their jobs. We saw the CEO of Wachovia lose his job yesterday. So I think you are seeing some of that and they do bear an enormous amount of responsibility. And frankly, whether they like it or not, I guess they're taking it, right?

 

Question: How has Bernanke handled the crisis?

 

Andrew Ross Sorkin: Well, Bernanke is an interesting character because at this very moment that we're filming this today, he probably actually looks like he's done the right thing. He might have been slow off the mark initially, but he really got aggressive and did some very unique and interesting things, offering and lending money to the brokerages in ways that they've never been lent to before. And so you can give him an A+ for creativity. The question is really whether this is a long term solution or a stock gap, a band aid and whether he is just allowing Rome to burn a little bit longer. That I think, is the fundamental question and I'm sure we don't have the answer to that just yet.

 

Recorded on: June 3, 2008

 

The "big bank" CEOs are largely responsible, says Sorkin.

NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller on ​the multiple dimensions of space and human sexuality

Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
  • What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
  • Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
Keep reading Show less

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

Sponsored
  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.