Alan Weisman: Is humankind doomed?
Alan Weisman's reports from around the world have appeared in Harper's, The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic Monthly, The Los Angeles Times Magazine, Orion, Wilson Quarterly, Vanity Fair, Mother Jones, Discover, Audubon, Condé Nast Traveler, and in many anthologies, including Best American Science Writing 2006. His most recent book, The World Without Us, a bestseller translated into 30 languages, was named the Best Nonfiction Book of 2007 by both Time Magazine and Entertainment Weekly, the #1 Nonfiction Audiobook of 2007 by iTunes; a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award in Nonfiction, for the Orion Prize, and a Book Sense 2008 Honor Book.
His previous books include An Echo In My Blood; Gaviotas: A Village to Reinvent the World (10th anniversary edition available from Chelsea Green); and La Frontera: The United States Border With Mexico. He has also written the introduction for The World We Have by Thich Nhat Hanh, available this fall from Parallax Press. A senior producer for Homelands Productions, Weisman’s documentaries have aired on National Public Radio, Public Radio International, and American Public Media. Each spring, he leads an annual field program in international journalism at the University of Arizona, where he is Laureate Associate Professor in Journalism and Latin American Studies. He and his wife, sculptor Beckie Kravetz, live in western Massachusetts.
Alan Weisman: Well, eventually, yes. Humans are doomed, because every species eventually goes extinct, just like every dies eventually. I mean that true in the whole history of biology. Now, in this book, I purposefully avoided talking about, what I think could be the scenario, which is if we go on business as usual, just using the same dirty fuels that are completely destroying the chemical balance or changing the chemical balance of the atmosphere and the seas and the land in ways that we no longer can control. The outlook is rather bleak. It looks like we are going to have more and more biological loses until we start losing stuff that we really depend on. I mean there are crashes of our pollinators right now, these last years started to go dumb, bats are going down right now and that's going to affect our food supply. Our sheer numbers which is something that it’s a fact that I drop in towards the end of the book, is also an issue. I mean, if we keep growing by a million every four days, which is the way the human rates is growing. At a certain point we are going to have outstripped the resources of the planet to support us. That the only way that we are surviving as well as we are alright now, is that we have used incredible technology, agriculture technology to stretch our food resources, but that's starting to have negative repercussions. Part of that technology is rather simple, we just scraped away more forest, wilderness, habitat, et cetera to grow more stuff, but now we are start to miss the species that used to use that like migrating birds that would stops in the tree as of Central America or of Indonesia or of Africa on their way between the hemispheres. We need those spaces in many ways, they spread seeds, they do all kinds of useful things and they're beautiful, they inspire us. We have also force fed the land with chemicals and we probably do not have time to get into that now, there are books that talk about that great length, so I certainly touch on it, here because some of those chemicals are really changing the way other things live on the land, including possibly us. More and more physicians are concerned that all these poisons that we use to keep pests away et cetera might possibly be poisoning us in some ways that are cumulative. So, yeah, I am really concerned that if business goes on as usual, we are going to hasten our extinction. But, by the same token, we are also in the flower of our species life, right now, we can do so many things, yes we produce some bad stuff that I talk about in the book like PCB's or plastics, which in of themselves are very useful except an unintended consequence of their production is that we did realize that nothing knows how to break them down yet, they are very indestructibility as become plague, because they're every, there is big rafts of to them floating on the oceans. At the same time we're also creating wonderful thing, we create beautiful art, we create wonderful music, technological advances like the computers that we communicate to each other with, we are kind of thrilling and I would like to think that with all this knowledge that we have, we have been in this information age that we're going to segue into a wisdom age, where since we pride ourselves in being this species that some times we call ourselves the only species, I am not sure that is we have anyway knowing, but we call ourselves the only species, that could foresee the consequences of its action, that can consider the future. Well, knowing the future or understanding what will happen is one thing, having the wisdom to do something about is another and obviously we have to bring ourselves back in the balalnce.
Recorded on: 2/5/08
Every species eventually goes extinct, Weisman says.
These modern-day hermits can sometimes spend decades without ever leaving their apartments.
- A hikikomori is a type of person in Japan who locks themselves away in their bedrooms, sometimes for years.
- This is a relatively new phenomenon in Japan, likely due to rigid social customs and high expectations for academic and business success.
- Many believe hikikomori to be a result of how Japan interprets and handles mental health issues.
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.