401(k) vs. Que Sera, Sera

Bruce Finley: Younger workers' expectations for communication are at an all-time high.  They expect to be communicated to immediately and transparently because that’s what they get when they communicate among themselves.  The challenge for a company is, how do we engage in that new world?  How do we socially engage with all the people who are there?  So, there’s that level that requires transparency on a level that we’ve never had to deliver in the past.  

When young people think about benefits, first of all, they often don’t.  I mean, when you think about saving for retirement, it doesn’t really relate too much when you’re just starting out.  We’re seeing some of those things change, though, and particularly in the health area.  Having access to some kind of protection from your employer is really important to people, and that’s true of young people as well.  

As employers. you’re probably asking your people to get more involved in their benefits.  But when you think about it, traditional pension plans were created and delivered to people without any action that they had to do themselves.  Today, because we have defined contribution schemes - schemes that encourage 401(k) plans that require people to understand whether they’re going to contribute, how much they’re going to contribute - they have to be more involved.  And it’s still a little bit alien to young people.  

They have a lot of conflicting demands for their money.  Let’s face it: they aren’t necessarily the highest paid people in the organization.  And so if they were able to start saving for their retirement when they’re really young, through the power of compounding is going to build up to their advantage in the best possible way.  But it’s hard for them to do that because they’re so – there’s so many other things that they have that they’re already responsible for.  For example, they might be paying off college loans; they have to pay the high cost of just living today.  

So getting people to understand benefits, but even more so to participate as early as possible and get involved, it’s a challenge.  It’s a challenge for every one of you when you think about communicating with your young people.

Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd

For Bruce Finley, the benefits discussion is a major (and often lost) opportunity for companies to reach young workers in a meaningful way, getting them more deeply invested in their careers and their futures.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.