UCEA 2007 - How national technology policy REALLY gets made

Friday was the first day of sessions at the UCEA convention. CASTLE sponsored a panel discussion on national K-12 educational technology policy, moderated by Drs. Sara Dexter (U. Virginia) and Matt Militello (U. Massachusetts-Amherst).


 Listen to the podcast! (73.9 Mb, 81 minutes)

Panelists

  • Hilary Goldman, Director of Government Affairs, ISTE
  • Dr. Mary Ann Wolf, Executive Director, SETDA
  • Doug Levin, Senior Director of Education Policy, Cable in the Classroom
  • Some main themes

    • In the mid– to late 1990s, there were LOTS of national funding initiatives aimed at K-12 ed tech – all were replaced by EETT, which is much smaller and more limited – today, EETT has declined from over $700 million to $272 million – in the past, the Bush administration has even attempted to zero out the EETT budget – Congress has saved the program but at increasingly lower levels
    • There is a perception that the job is done
    • Teachers have not been trained how to use technology to improve student learning outcomes
    • Educators are moving slow – lots of missed opportunities – extremely incremental change in a revolutionary environment
    • TPCK model – preservice teachers should not take separate ed tech classes – should be integrated with content-specific methods courses
    • We are finally starting to get research that is helpful for policy purposes – for example, the eMints program in Missouri and other states
    • The amount of education that people need is astounding – state and federal policymakers, education associations, the public – they make major assumptions about what is happening that just aren’t true
      • Example: because nearly all schools are wired, people truly think that means that all kids have access to the Internet – far from being true – only buildings and teacher computers are wired – every student is NOT wired and connected
      • Example: lots of money has been poured into student information systems – as a result, people think that teachers are getting data that informs their day-to-day instructional practice – again, this is far from true – in most districts, the data that are in these systems are not that granular
      • You have to use sexy vocabulary – the terms of art – that capture policymakers’ attention – right now it is global competitiveness
      • High school reform and other change efforts – technology is not specifically articulated as a component – it thus gets lost or left out
      • Ed tech policy is still fairly immature - we’re in our tweens
      • Groups like NEA, AFT, NSBA, AASA, NASSP, and NAESP are not knowledgeable about technology – they advocate for Title I, IDEA - they don’t advocate for ed tech
      • The Partnership for 21st Century Skills is trying to change the conversation rather than trying to figure out how to fit ed tech into existing paradigms / models / laws - this is a real herky-jerky process
      • There is not, and has not been, a systemic long-term research agenda, funded by policymakers, to answer key research questions about K-12 educational technology
      • What kind of research is needed to further the cause of K-12 educational technology?
      • Most education academics are naive about how policy gets made – don’t really understand the policy process – much educational research is not pertinent or helpful to policy conversations and the questions that are being asked by policymakers - we have to remember that ed tech is only one voice of many
      • ETAN – www.edtechactionnetwork.org – you don’t have to get to DC – can plug in your e-mail and zip code and get resources and information – just 12 letters can make a difference – meeting in local offices back home also make an impact – asking questions at local town halls sponsored by legislators
      • We were blessed in the 1990s with the folks that were in the U.S. Department of Education (US DOE) – there are lots of places where this can break down – there are not strong advocates there today – one place to focus advocacy efforts is the US DOE, not just legislators
      • Why has school leadership been left out of the ed tech policy conversation and policy efforts? – historically, efforts were focused on affecting the classroom, not on changing the system – promising levers appear to be 21st century skills, data-driven decision-making, and cybersafety
      • We could draft Title II legislation around professional development for administrators regarding technology leadership
      • [left to right: Sara Dexter, Matt Militello, Hilary Goldman, Mary Ann Wolf, Doug Levin]

        China’s artificial sun reaches fusion temperature: 100 million degrees

        In a breakthrough for nuclear fusion research, scientists at China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor have produced temperatures necessary for nuclear fusion on Earth.

        Credit: EAST Team
        Surprising Science
        • The EAST reactor was able to heat hydrogen to temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius.
        • Nuclear fusion could someday provide the planet with a virtually limitless supply of clean energy.
        • Still, scientists have many other obstacles to pass before fusion technology becomes a viable energy source.
        Keep reading Show less

        Project 100,000: The Vietnam War's cruel and deadly experiment

        Military recruits are supposed to be assessed to see whether they're fit for service. What happens when they're not?

        Flickr user Tommy Truong79
        Politics & Current Affairs
        • During the Vietnam War, Robert McNamara began a program called Project 100,000.
        • The program brought over 300,000 men to Vietnam who failed to meet minimum criteria for military service, both physically and mentally.
        • Project 100,000 recruits were killed in disproportionate numbers and fared worse after their military service than their civilian peers, making the program one of the biggest—and possibly cruelest—mistakes of the Vietnam War.
        Keep reading Show less

        Here's how diverse the 116th Congress is set to become

        The 116th Congress is set to break records in term of diversity among its lawmakers, though those changes are coming almost entirely from Democrats.

        (Photo: MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
        Politics & Current Affairs
        • Women and nonwhite candidates made record gains in the 2018 midterms.
        • In total, almost half of the newly elected Congressional representatives are not white men.
        • Those changes come almost entirely from Democrats; Republican members-elect are all white men except for one woman.
        Keep reading Show less