The Psychology Behind Why We Give

You may be wondering how one person has raised almost $50,000 to make potato salad.


Americans are now donating more than ever before. Recent studies have shown that we're more likely to give to one person, rather than many. In fact, we're willing to donate twice as much if it serves the needs of an individual, instead of a group. This establishes an inverse relationship between the amount of people involved and the responsibility we feel to reach out. 

But why? There is an explanation that stems from individual involvement and personalization—the opportunity for people to actually change future trajectories and become part of how stories are shaped. This reasoning is driven by empathetic roots that run deep in our psyche:

  • Equity Theory:  In our interpersonal relationships we seek out fair distribution of resources. Otherwise we become anxious and actively seek to repair the balance between input and output. (Adams, 1976)
  • Identity-based Motivation: The degree to which identities are malleable has a large impact on our readiness to act. The more we identify with a cause, the more our effort becomes meaningful (Oyserman, 2009)
  • High-return cooperative strategy: Even without apparent personal gain, giving back and getting behind a cause make us feel good about ourselves as an individual.
  • These psychological roots directly relate to crowdfunding today as it involves multiple people – the crowd – all individually supporting one single cause. I find this fascinating, because between advertising and the multitude of global initiatives competing for our limited attention span, crowdfunding curates the over-stimulus and solicitation of money through transparency of a campaign message that donors can connect with on a personalized, intimate, and individual basis. Never before has it been easier to create a direct link between the individual and the cause than it is now.  

    Image source: http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2013/02/06/1226571/488115-giving-to-others.jpg

    'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

    Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

    Sponsored by Northwell Health
    • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
    • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
    • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
    Keep reading Show less

    In U.S. first, drug company faces criminal charges for distributing opioids

    It marks a major shift in the government's battle against the opioid crisis.

    George Frey/Bloomberg via Getty Images
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • The nation's sixth-largest drug distributor is facing criminal charges related to failing to report suspicious drug orders, among other things.
    • It marks the first time a drug company has faced criminal charges for distributing opioids.
    • Since 1997, nearly 222,000 Americans have died from prescription opioids, partly thanks to unethical doctors who abuse the system.
    Keep reading Show less

    Scientists create a "lifelike" material that has metabolism and can self-reproduce

    An innovation may lead to lifelike evolving machines.

    Shogo Hamada/Cornell University
    Surprising Science
    • Scientists at Cornell University devise a material with 3 key traits of life.
    • The goal for the researchers is not to create life but lifelike machines.
    • The researchers were able to program metabolism into the material's DNA.
    Keep reading Show less

    Calling out Cersei Lannister: Elizabeth Warren reviews Game of Thrones

    The real Game of Thrones might be who best leverages the hit HBO show to shape political narratives.

    Photo credit: Mario Tama / Getty Images
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • Sen. Elizabeth Warren argues that Game of Thrones is primarily about women in her review of the wildly popular HBO show.
    • Warren also touches on other parallels between the show and our modern world, such as inequality, political favoritism of the elite, and the dire impact of different leadership styles on the lives of the people.
    • Her review serves as another example of using Game of Thrones as a political analogy and a tool for framing political narratives.
    Keep reading Show less