PopularSurprising SciencePersonal GrowthMind & BrainSex & RelationshipsTechnology & InnovationCulture & ReligionPolitics & Current Affairs
In between time checks on the Doomsday Clock, Stephen Hawking is here to remind us we are living in dangerous times.
05 December, 2016
Stephen Hawking attends the New Space Exploration Initiative 'Breakthrough Starshot' Announcement at One World Observatory on April 12, 2016 in New York City. Photo by Jemal Countess/Getty Images
<p>In between <a href="http://bigthink.com/natalie-shoemaker/the-bulletin-of-atomic-scientists-just-made-a-sobering-announcement-regarding-its-doomsday-clock" target="_blank">time checks on the Doomsday Clock</a>, Stephen Hawking is here to remind us we are living in dangerous times. So, what are we going to do about it?</p> <p>“We face awesome environmental challenges: climate change, food production, overpopulation, the decimation of other species, epidemic disease, acidification of the oceans,” Hawking wrote in a piece for <em><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/01/stephen-hawking-dangerous-time-planet-inequality" target="_blank">The Guardian</a> </em>on Dec 1. “We now have the technology to destroy the planet on which we live, but have <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/sep/26/i-think-the-human-race-has-no-future-if-it-doesnt-go-to-space" target="_blank">not yet developed the ability to escape it</a>. Perhaps in a few hundred years, we will have established human colonies amid the stars, but right now we only have one planet, and we need to work together to protect it.”</p> <p>The growth of America—its path to progress—has been paved with some unintended consequences. But one could argue that in this time of disaster, we could build something better. “To do that, we need to break down, not build up, barriers within and between nations,” Hawking writes. Hawking also acknowledged the recent turn toward nativist populism in western political elections: </p> <blockquote></blockquote><p>What matters now, far more than the choices made by these two electorates, is <a class="u-underline" href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/08/eu-referendum-star-experts-line-up-to-warn-of-brexit-risk-in-tv-ad">how the elites react</a>. Should we, in turn, reject these votes as outpourings of crude populism that fail to take account of the facts, and attempt to circumvent or circumscribe the choices that they represent? I would argue that this would be a terrible mistake.<iframe frameborder="0" height="1" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" width="620"></p> <p>The concerns underlying these votes about the economic consequences of globalisation and <a class="u-underline" href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/19/stephen-hawking-warns-threats-to-humans-science-technology-bbc-reith-lecture">accelerating technological change</a> are absolutely understandable. The automation of factories has already decimated jobs in traditional manufacturing, and the <a class="u-underline" href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/oct/19/stephen-hawking-ai-best-or-worst-thing-for-humanity-cambridge">rise of artificial intelligence</a> is likely to extend this job destruction deep into the middle classes, with only the most caring, creative or supervisory roles remaining.</p> <p>The <a href="http://bigthink.com/natalie-shoemaker/what-will-the-world-look-like-following-the-paris-agreement" target="_blank">COP21 Paris agreement</a> saw the first-ever time 196 nations came together to take action against climate change. The Paris Agreement is ambitious in its goals, aiming for a zero-carbon-emission economy to be established by the later half of the 21<sup>st</sup> century. It's a confirmation to businesses that we're moving away from coal and fossil fuels. However, <a href="http://qz.com/832090/trump-has-vowed-to-yank-the-us-from-the-global-climate-pact-yes-he-can-do-it/" target="_blank">Donald Trump’s election threatens this arrangement</a>.</p> <p>Government regulation will be a <a href="http://bigthink.com/natalie-shoemaker/fossil-fuels-could-be-history-in-10-years-says-researcher" target="_blank">huge influencer in energy adoption in the future</a>. Uruguay’s own <a href="http://bigthink.com/natalie-shoemaker/uruguay-just-showed-up-everyone-at-the-paris-climate-conference" target="_blank">radical adoption of green energy solutions</a> shows just how much policy can affect change.</p> <p>There is a very real possibility the progress made toward lessening the effects of climate change and <a href="http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/climate-change-will-cause-mass-human-displacement-how-do-we-prepare" target="_blank">everything that comes with it</a> will be undone once Trump takes office.</p> <p>"The United States used to be the world leader in technology," says Bill Nye. "But when you have this group of leaders, elected officials who are anti-science you’re setting the U.S. back and then ultimately setting the world back."</p> <p>Read the full piece by Stephen Hawking over at <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/01/stephen-hawking-dangerous-time-planet-inequality" target="_blank">The Guardian</a>. </p> <div class="video-full-card-placeholder" data-slug="bill-nye-on-science-literacy-and-elected-officials" style="border: 1px solid #ccc;"> <div class="rm-shortcode" data-media_id="z3h7CVaq" data-player_id="FvQKszTI" data-rm-shortcode-id="f6a09c8c0a5581c3ba674039a16c195b"> <div id="botr_z3h7CVaq_FvQKszTI_div" class="jwplayer-media" data-jwplayer-video-src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/z3h7CVaq-FvQKszTI.js"> <img src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/thumbs/z3h7CVaq-1920.jpg" class="jwplayer-media-preview" /> </div> <script src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/z3h7CVaq-FvQKszTI.js"></script> </div> </div> </iframe></p>
Keep reading Show less
climate change donald trump green energy Paris Agreement politics science literacy Space Exploration stephen hawking conservatism Brexit
How easily grossed out are you? Your sensitivity to disgust reveals more about you than you'd probably be comfortable with, from how you'll vote in this election to your potential to be a cold-blooded killer.
21 September, 2016
Who do you think has a stronger stomach: a liberal or a conservative? Who is the tougher party?
<p>The knee-jerk answer to this question might lean toward the latter, because conservative political ideologies – on the whole – are perceived by both sides as taking a harder line. But what brain circuits are stirring beneath those hardline decisions?</p> <p>An international team of researchers conducted <a href="http://spp.sagepub.com/content/3/5/537.abstract">two studies</a> (involving more than 31,000 people in total) and found a positive relationship between sensitivity to disgust and political conservatism. "Across both samples, contamination disgust, which reflects a heightened concern with interpersonally transmitted disease and pathogens, was most strongly associated with conservatism," the study reports. </p> <p>Disgust is a sliding scale, and we’re all grossed out by different things. Some of us shudder at the thought of seeing blood. Some draw the line at foul smells. There are people who are disgusted by homosexuality and there are people are disgusted by homophobia. And there are a few groups who have almost no sensitivity to disgust at all.</p> <p>Science journalist Kathleen McAuliffe knows a lot about disgust. She took us on a wonderful tour of parasites <a href="http://bigthink.com/videos/kathleen-mcauliffe-on-parasites-ability-to-manipulate-behavior">here</a>, and in the video above she tackles the link between visceral disgust and moral disgust. It’s hard for the average person to fathom how someone can decide to kill in cold blood, and also physically carry out the act. But research has found that cold-blooded killers have damage to the brain circuits involved in the disgust response, which explains why these people are less squeamish about not just the moral quandary of taking a life but are also quite comfortable carrying out the grizzly act.</p> <p>McAuliffe points to another group of individuals who have similarly impaired disgust circuits: people with Huntington’s disease. This is a genetically transmitted neurodegenerative disease, and those with it are unable to recognize expressions of disgust in others, and don’t tend to react to foul smells, sights or tastes. People with Huntington’s also have impaired fear recognition, as the two areas are closely related in the brain. </p> <p>Which brings us back to conservative political ideologies, particularly immigration aversion. McAuliffe notes that there is a link between germophobia and xenophobia, as evidenced by a study of 2000 Danish people and 1200 Americans, where the data showed that opposition to immigration increased in direct proportion to the disgust sensitivity of the individual.</p> <p>If you want to see where you sit on the disgust sensitivity scale, there’s a quiz for your amusement over <a href="https://www.helloquizzy.com/quizzy/take">here</a>.</p> <p>Kathleen McAuliffe's book is <a href="http://www.indiebound.org/book/9780544192225"><i>This Is Your Brain on Parasites: How Tiny Creatures Manipulate Our Behavior and Shape Society</i></a>.</p> <p><img height="150" src="%5Cr%5Cnhttps://s3.amazonaws.com/edge-misc-assets/Book+Covers/Kathleen+McAuliffe+2016" width="225"></p>
Keep reading Show less
psychopaths visceral disgust moral disgust disgust sensitivity Kathleen McAuliffe conservatism xenophobia germophobia revolting gross videos