One way to increase voter turnout? More sleep.

A new study posits that sleep deprivation decreases civic participation.

One way to increase voter turnout? More sleep.
Photo by: Media for Medical/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
  • Forty percent of Americans sleep less than seven hours, resulting in lost productivity, more accidents, and an increased likelihood of dementia.
  • A new study shows that a lack of sleep also results in decreased voter turnout.
  • Other prosocial behaviors are also implicated in this discussion, including signing petitions and donating money to charity.

As Democratic candidates discuss ways to increase voter turnout in 2020, a missing piece of the puzzle has been addressed in Nature Human Behaviour. You likely won't hear Elizabeth Warren or Pete Buttigieg discuss the importance of sleep for ensuring more bodies at ballot boxes, but that's what a new study from researchers in the U.S. and Germany discovered.

Sleep has become an important line of research in recent years. Forty percent of Americans sleep less than seven hours per night, resulting in lost productivity, more accidents, and an increased likelihood of dementia. Insomnia is a growing concern for millions.

Yet the opposite is also true. For example, napping increases productivity and engagement at work. Short bouts of sleep help sharpen our senses, strengthen our immune system, reduce the likelihood of cardiovascular disease, help us solve complex problems, and increase mood and cognitive performance. Regular nights of good sleep accomplish many similar goals.

For this study, the team of John Holbein (Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT), Jerome Schafer (Department of Political Science, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich), and David Dickinson (Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC) wanted to know if sleep reduces civic engagement. Using three methods of testing, they found the answer to be affirmative.

Don't Sleep On Your Local Elections | Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj | Netflix

Over the last six decades, they write, increasing number of citizens in industrialized societies receive inadequate sleep—the number has increased fourfold during that time. They estimate between 50-70 million Americans are chronically sleep deprived. Individual negative health outcomes are well-studied. How that affects society, less so.

By conducting three complementary studies, the team found that less sleep equals less participation in the voting booth. Regardless of intention, when citizens were not well-rested, they were less likely to follow through on them. They write,

"Individuals who sleep less and who are chronically fatigued may struggle to engage, even if they want to do so. Such individuals may lack the motivation, capacity and social connections to overcome the hurdles, distractions or costs that get in the way of participating in social processes that benefit society."

It's not only voting. Other prosocial behaviors are also implicated in this discussion, including signing petitions and donating money to charity. Many of these citizens state they'd like to civically engage. Anecdote is not data, but when one is cranky or undernourished from lack of sleep, their motivation suffers. The nation suffers as well.

Hundreds of campaigners in Hamburg's Barclaycard Arena count out the ballots of the district assembly elections.

Photo by Axel Heimken/picture alliance via Getty Images

There are many reasons citizens don't vote. In 2016, 58 percent of eligible voters cast their ballot in America, an eight-point drop from 2008. Midterm voters in 2018 hit a 50-year high—plenty of sleep!—yet we cannot become complacent in 2020. We need to get enough sleep.

As John Holbein says about the consequences of sleep deprivation,

"This shows that many people want to participate but are just too tired to do so. Sleep deprivation has real consequences for the social health of our communities. Not only does it make it harder for people to get their jobs done or to do well in school it also makes them less likely to contribute in ways that build democracies."

Holbein notes that when we don't get enough sleep, we become more selfish. We focus on ourselves more and society less. While physiologically understandable, this does not help build a great nation.

Maybe the next stump speech by Democratic candidates should include the benefits of sleep. In fact, a recent NY Times special posed the question to 21 of them: "How many hours of sleep do you get a night?" The main response: "Not enough." The only two to reply "eight" were Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand. Eric Swalwell might laugh when he replies "four," but sadly, that answer isn't good for his health (or that of America).

Asking voters about their sleep habits might take some of them by surprise, but the science is sound. If we ask it of ourselves, we should be asking it of our leaders as well. When it comes to democratic participation, everyone's effort is required.


Stay in touch with Derek on Twitter and Facebook.

Massive 'Darth Vader' isopod found lurking in the Indian Ocean

The father of all giant sea bugs was recently discovered off the coast of Java.

A close up of Bathynomus raksasa

SJADE 2018
Surprising Science
  • A new species of isopod with a resemblance to a certain Sith lord was just discovered.
  • It is the first known giant isopod from the Indian Ocean.
  • The finding extends the list of giant isopods even further.
Keep reading Show less

Astronomers find more than 100,000 "stellar nurseries"

Every star we can see, including our sun, was born in one of these violent clouds.

Credit: NASA / ESA via Getty Images
Surprising Science

This article was originally published on our sister site, Freethink.

An international team of astronomers has conducted the biggest survey of stellar nurseries to date, charting more than 100,000 star-birthing regions across our corner of the universe.

Stellar nurseries: Outer space is filled with clouds of dust and gas called nebulae. In some of these nebulae, gravity will pull the dust and gas into clumps that eventually get so big, they collapse on themselves — and a star is born.

These star-birthing nebulae are known as stellar nurseries.

The challenge: Stars are a key part of the universe — they lead to the formation of planets and produce the elements needed to create life as we know it. A better understanding of stars, then, means a better understanding of the universe — but there's still a lot we don't know about star formation.

This is partly because it's hard to see what's going on in stellar nurseries — the clouds of dust obscure optical telescopes' view — and also because there are just so many of them that it's hard to know what the average nursery is like.

The survey: The astronomers conducted their survey of stellar nurseries using the massive ALMA telescope array in Chile. Because ALMA is a radio telescope, it captures the radio waves emanating from celestial objects, rather than the light.

"The new thing ... is that we can use ALMA to take pictures of many galaxies, and these pictures are as sharp and detailed as those taken by optical telescopes," Jiayi Sun, an Ohio State University (OSU) researcher, said in a press release.

"This just hasn't been possible before."

Over the course of the five-year survey, the group was able to chart more than 100,000 stellar nurseries across more than 90 nearby galaxies, expanding the amount of available data on the celestial objects tenfold, according to OSU researcher Adam Leroy.

New insights: The survey is already yielding new insights into stellar nurseries, including the fact that they appear to be more diverse than previously thought.

"For a long time, conventional wisdom among astronomers was that all stellar nurseries looked more or less the same," Sun said. "But with this survey we can see that this is really not the case."

"While there are some similarities, the nature and appearance of these nurseries change within and among galaxies," he continued, "just like cities or trees may vary in important ways as you go from place to place across the world."

Astronomers have also learned from the survey that stellar nurseries aren't particularly efficient at producing stars and tend to live for only 10 to 30 million years, which isn't very long on a universal scale.

Looking ahead: Data from the survey is now publicly available, so expect to see other researchers using it to make their own observations about stellar nurseries in the future.

"We have an incredible dataset here that will continue to be useful," Leroy said. "This is really a new view of galaxies and we expect to be learning from it for years to come."

Protecting space stations from deadly space debris

Tiny specks of space debris can move faster than bullets and cause way more damage. Cleaning it up is imperative.

  • NASA estimates that more than 500,000 pieces of space trash larger than a marble are currently in orbit. Estimates exceed 128 million pieces when factoring in smaller pieces from collisions. At 17,500 MPH, even a paint chip can cause serious damage.
  • To prevent this untrackable space debris from taking out satellites and putting astronauts in danger, scientists have been working on ways to retrieve large objects before they collide and create more problems.
  • The team at Clearspace, in collaboration with the European Space Agency, is on a mission to capture one such object using an autonomous spacecraft with claw-like arms. It's an expensive and very tricky mission, but one that could have a major impact on the future of space exploration.

This is the first episode of Just Might Work, an original series by Freethink, focused on surprising solutions to our biggest problems.

Catch more Just Might Work episodes on their channel:

Personal Growth

Meet the worm with a jaw of metal

Metal-like materials have been discovered in a very strange place.