Map shows homicide hotspots in medieval London

Interactive map reveals the horror — and the patterns — of murder in 14th-century London.

  • This map shows the 142 murders that were committed in London from 1300 to 1340.
  • Each clickable pin reveals the grisly details as recorded in contemporary coroner's reports.
  • Then as now, stabbing was the main method of killing in London — but the murder rate was three times higher.

It's January 1322 and William, the son of Henry the Goldsmith at Rowe, is peeing in the public urinal in Cheapside. The man next to him complains that William is spraying on his shoes. William doesn't like the sound of that: he punches the fellow, knocking his poleaxe to the ground. At this point, a bystander named Philip intervenes — further inflaming William's temper. William picks up the poleaxe and delivers a fatal blow to Philip's head. The other man gets away with just his footwear soiled.

Manuel Eisner, a professor of comparative and developmental criminology at the University of Cambridge, studies the history of interpersonal violence. The aforementioned darkly comic tale is his favorite among the 142 medieval murders his team at the Violence Research Centre have pinned on a map of London.

The Violence Research Centre, part of Cambridge's Institute of Criminology, mapped all homicides from London coroner's records covering the period from 1300 to 1340. They extracted information on victims and perpetrators, weapons used, and — as exactly as possible — the scenes of the crime.

Each of the homicides is plotted on a map of medieval London, marked by a clickable pin that reveals all the information on each case.

London, Stab City

Early 14th-century London had a similar homicide rate to the U.S. today. Image source: Violence Research Centre

The result is a theatre of horror, seen through the prism of a primitive police procedural: two boatmen beating a saddler to death with their oars, an innkeeper murdered after winning at backgammon, and an angry shopkeeper who smashes the head of a night-time troublemaker — among many other grisly tales.

The distribution of the pins reveals a few homicide hot spots in medieval London: if you valued your life, you stayed away from Westcheap (modern-day Cheapside) and Leadenhall Market, for instance. Here's what else the map teaches us about violent deaths in early 14th-century London:

  • More than half of all homicides occurred on just two days of the week: Sunday (31 percent) and Monday (21 percent). "Sunday was when people had time to engage in social activities that would occasionally trigger frictions leading to assault," says Eisner. Monday's high score is a bit of a mystery. Possibly, Sunday drama spilled over into Monday; or attack victims often took a day to die.
  • Most homicides occurred in crowded streets and markets and other public spaces rather than in private residences. Churches and other religious buildings were three times as dangerous as brothels.
  • Daggers and swords were the most popular weapons, used in 68 percent of cases. A further 19 percent involved quarter-staff poles.
  • Chance of violent death increased as night fell. Seventy-seven percent of all murders took place between the early evening and the first hours after curfew.
  • Ninety-two percent of the murders were committed by men, of all walks of life: commoners, upper-class types, even members of the clergy.
  • Of the 142 crimes, only four were perpetrated by women: One 'cuffed' (and killed) a five-year-old boy who was stealing a bit of wool; Agnes, a prostitute, fell into an argument with Lucy, a pregnant woman, and in the process struck her "on the belly with fist and knees… leaving her half-dead in the street"; Nicola from Cardiff, a beggar-woman, is the likely perpetrator of the infanticide of 'baby Alice'; and Isabella Heron stabbed her lover, a fishmonger, to death in the middle of a heated argument.

Each of the 142 Coroner's inquests upon which this map was based, was drawn up in the presence of a jury composed of free men from the ward where the body was found, plus three neighboring wards — medieval London counted 24 in all. A jury could number anywhere between 12 and 50 members.

When you explore the London Medieval Murder Map yourself, you'll find that you can choose between two maps. Why? Because it's not easy to find a map that corresponds exactly to the time frame of these murders.

  • The Braun-Hogenberg map (1572): produced more than two centuries after the homicides described in the coroner's reports, yet it predates London's late-16th-century spurt of growth; Londoners from either era would have little trouble navigating their counterpart city.
  • The Historic Towns Trust map (1989): provides a detailed view of the topography of 1270s London, much of which would still be recognizable at the time of the killings.

You can also zoom in and out and apply a number of filters to the map, selecting pins based on gender of the victim, nature of the crime scene (public or private), year, type of weapon and ward, i.e. location.

Almost 700 years old, these medieval murders read as very remote tragedies. But there are some similarities with our own age, Eisner remarks: both then and now, homicides often start with trivial altercations, usually occur on non-working days, and mostly take place in the evening.

Assuming that the coroner's reports offer a fairly complete overview of violent death in the period described, and factoring in London's population at the time (around 80,000), the approximate homicide rate for the period described is about 4.5 per 100,000. That's triple the rate of the homicide rate in today's London (1.5 per 100,000), but only slightly lower than the U.S. national average (5 per 100,000).

The Interactive London Medieval Murder Map can be found here at the Cambridge Institute of Criminology's Violence Research Centre. Many thanks to Catherine Stokes for sending this in.

Strange Maps #951

Got a strange map? Let me know at strangemaps@gmail.com.

Stand up against religious discrimination – even if it’s not your religion

As religious diversity increases in the United States, we must learn to channel religious identity into interfaith cooperation.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Religious diversity is the norm in American life, and that diversity is only increasing, says Eboo Patel.
  • Using the most painful moment of his life as a lesson, Eboo Patel explains why it's crucial to be positive and proactive about engaging religious identity towards interfaith cooperation.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

The biggest threat to America? Americans.

Pulitzer Prize-winner Jared Diamond explains why some nations make it through epic crises and why others fail.

Videos
  • "A country is not going to resolve a national crisis unless it acknowledges that it's in a crisis," says Jared Diamond. "If you don't, you're going to get nowhere. Many Americans still don't recognize today that the United States is descending into a crisis."
  • The U.S. tends to focus on "bad countries" like China, Canada and Mexico as the root of its problems, however Diamond points out the missing piece: Americans are generating their own problems.
  • The crisis the U.S. is experiencing is not cause for despair. The U.S. has survived many tragedies, such as the War of Independence and the Great Depression – history is proof that the U.S. can get through this current crisis too.
Keep reading Show less

10 new things we’ve learned about death

If you don't want to know anything about your death, consider this your spoiler warning.

Culture & Religion
  • For centuries cultures have personified death to give this terrifying mystery a familiar face.
  • Modern science has demystified death by divulging its biological processes, yet many questions remain.
  • Studying death is not meant to be a morbid reminder of a cruel fate, but a way to improve the lives of the living.
Keep reading Show less

Where the evidence of fake news is really hiding

When it comes to sniffing out whether a source is credible or not, even journalists can sometimes take the wrong approach.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • We all think that we're competent consumers of news media, but the research shows that even journalists struggle with identifying fact from fiction.
  • When judging whether a piece of media is true or not, most of us focus too much on the source itself. Knowledge has a context, and it's important to look at that context when trying to validate a source.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less