97 – Where (and How) Evolution Is Taught In the US

This map is drawn up by a proponent of evolution, as can be deduced from the remarks on the map and even its colours (green is good, red is bad).

 Frank Jacobs
23 July, 2010
97 – Where (and How) Evolution Is Taught In the US

Scientists generally accept the theory of evolution as the back-story of how animal species (including humans) came into being over a period of several billion years. Religious literalists maintain their belief in creation, as laid down in the Bible: God made the earth and all that is on it (including humans, after His own image) in one week, a couple of thousand years ago.

These are the extreme positions in a debate that has been raging for years now in the United States, and more particularly in the school system. Since each state can determine what should be in the local schools’ curriculum, the teaching of evolution and/or creation differs throughout the country. Yet contrary to what one might think, it’s not so that creation is taught in the Bible Belt states (in the South), and evolution in more liberal states (everywhere else).

This map is taken here from the website Science Against Evolution, which quite cleverly tries to win the debate for creation by arguing that the theory of evolution itself has been discredited by scientific evidence and by numerous scientists. However, the map is drawn up by a proponent of evolution, as can be deduced from the remarks on the map and even its colours (green is good, red is bad).

Green indicates that evolution theory is taught in a ‘very good/excellent’ way. These states include the liberal states of

  • California (“Well organized”)
  • Rhode Island
  • Connecticut
  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania and
  • Delaware.

    • But also a Midwestern, more conservative state such as

  • Indiana (“Exemplary”)

    • and even two southern states with a reputation for religiosity:

  • North Carolina (“Model of good organization”) and
  • South Carolina (“Thorough and challenging treatment”).

    • Yellow indicates indicates where evolution is taught in a ‘satisfactory/good’ manner. This includes the majority of states, from the north and west not usually included in the Bible Belt, such as

  • Washington
  • Oregon (“solid if uninspired”)
  • Idaho
  • Montana (“human evolution ignored”)
  • South Dakota
  • Nebraska (“marred by creationist notions”)
  • Minnesota
  • Michigan
  • New York (“inclusion of creationist jargon”)
  • Vermont and
  • Massachusetts (“marred by creationist jargon”)

    • Similarly, the colour red, indicating where the teaching of evolution is’ unsatisfactory, useless or absent’, is spread out across the entire country, not just in the South:

  • North Dakota
  • Wyoming
  • Illinois (“an embarrassment”)
  • Ohio (“the E-word is avoided”)
  • Maine (“useless”) and
  • Mississippi (“Mississippi seems determined to keep evolution outside its borders”)

    • The map first appeared in 2002 in Scientific American, and was based on data collected by Lawrence S. Lerner of California State University at Long Beach.

    What early US presidents looked like, according to AI-generated images

    "Deepfakes" and "cheap fakes" are becoming strikingly convincing — even ones generated on freely available apps.

    Abraham Lincoln, George Washington

    Magdalene Visaggio via Twitter
    Technology & Innovation
    • A writer named Magdalene Visaggio recently used FaceApp and Airbrush to generate convincing portraits of early U.S. presidents.
    • "Deepfake" technology has improved drastically in recent years, and some countries are already experiencing how it can weaponized for political purposes.
    • It's currently unknown whether it'll be possible to develop technology that can quickly and accurately determine whether a given video is real or fake.
    Keep reading Show less
    politics democracy big problems ai artificial intelligence deepfake

    It turns out, not all sitting is bad for you

    Context is everything.

    Yevhenii Kershkov on Unsplash
    Surprising Science

    The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced a number of new behaviours into daily routines, like physical distancing, mask-wearing and hand sanitizing. Meanwhile, many old behaviours such as attending events, eating out and seeing friends have been put on hold.

    Keep reading Show less
    human body health medicine health care work

    VR experiments manipulate how people feel about coffee

    A new study looks at how images of coffee's origins affect the perception of its premiumness and quality.

    Expert drinking coffee while wearing a VR headset.

    Credit: Escobar / Petit / Velasco, Frontiers in Psychology
    Surprising Science
    • Images can affect how people perceive the quality of a product.
    • In a new study, researchers show using virtual reality that images of farms positively influence the subjects' experience of coffee.
    • The results provide insights on the psychology and power of marketing.
    Keep reading Show less
    psychology coffee mind brain addiction virtual reality technology vr
    Videos

    Is empathy always good?

    Research has shown how important empathy is to relationships, but there are limits to its power.

    Quantcast