‘Lodestar’: Who is the anonymous author of the bombshell NYT op-ed?
The New York Times published an opinion column written by an anonymous “senior official in the Trump administration,” a rare move that's sparked theories as to who the author might be.
Lodestar. Treason. Sleeper cells.
These are just a few of the terms being tossed around a day after the New York Times published an opinion column written by an anonymous “senior official in the Trump administration.” The unsigned author claimed to be part of a secret “resistance,” operating inside and around the White House, that’s protecting the nation from the president’s “more misguided impulses.”
“It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room,” the author wrote. “We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.”
The column reportedly elicited “volcanic anger” from President Donald Trump, who responded on Wednesday with a one-word tweet: “TREASON?”
The Failing New York Times! pic.twitter.com/SHsXvYKpBf— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2018
The president wrote in another tweet: “Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!”
News of the unprecedented move spread quickly through Washington.
“It’s like the horror movies when everyone realizes the call is coming from inside the house,” one former White House official in close contact with former co-workers told The Washington Post.
On social media, the column sparked widespread and far-fetched speculation about the identity of the author, who seems to lean Republican given their implicit endorsement of traditionally conservative goals:
“Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more,” the author wrote.
Currently, the leading clue is a rather conspicuous word used by the anonymous author: lodestar, which is an astronomy term defined as a star that is used to guide the course of a ship.
Some noticed it’s a word Vice President Mike Pence seems to use frequently, spawning one of the most remarkable speculations in the search for the anonymous official.
Dan Bloom, a senior producer at Panoply Media, seems to be one of the first to have fleshed out the theory on Twitter, writing that lodestar “just seems like an unusual word to use in general, not to mention in an op-ed that's going to be widely read.”
The word is "LODESTAR." Note that it comes in the same paragraph praising John McCain. That would rule out flame-throwers like Stephen Miller and Dan Scavino and suggest someone with Senate ties. This reveal is not going to take long. pic.twitter.com/NwnUtvFlko— Dan downLODESTAR Bloom (@danbl00m) September 5, 2018
Others have proposed the author is someone from within Pence’s office.
If "lodestar" is the big clue, and given that Pence has used the word routinely in speeches, I would propose the key suspect is Pence's *speechwriter.*— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) September 5, 2018
Interestingly, Henry Kissinger also used the word lodestar recently, during his Eulogy to John McCain last weekend.
But what seems most likely is that lodestar is a red herring included in the piece to throw people off the track of the real author. It wouldn’t be the first time a White House official has used the tactic.
“To cover my tracks, I usually pay attention to other staffers' idioms and use that in my background quotes,” a White House official told Axios in May. “That throws the scent off me."
In any case, Pence told reporters on Thursday that the column is “a disgrace” whose publishing represents “a new low in American journalism” and “the New York Times should be ashamed and I think whoever wrote this anonymous editorial should also be ashamed as well.”
Other White House officials to deny authorship of the piece include Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defense James Mattis, Department of Homeland Security head Kirstjen Nielsen, and Director of National Intelligence chief Dan Coats.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders called the anonymous author a “coward” in a statement. First Lady Melania Trump echoed that sentiment on Thursday.
In an interview on Fox News, Kellyanne Conway, a counselor to the president, downplayed the column and suggested its author could be one of thousands of political appointees.
“It's not clear to us in any way that it was someone in the White House,” she said. “It says, ‘senior administration official,’ that could be many people. There are thousands of political appointees and hundreds of folks that would qualify for that title alone,” she said of the unnamed senior Trump administration official.
Just for fun. My wild guess list of top 5 possible NYT op-ed writers:— Mike Murphy (@murphymike) September 5, 2018
1.) Nikki Haley; buying insurance for future POTUS race
2.) Steve Mnuchin. Avoid looming pariah status in NYC
3.) Kirstjen Nielsen. Hates POTUS
4.) Dan Coats. Plan for Show Trials.
5.) Gina Haspel. #tradecraft
The column was published the same week Bob Woodward released a bombshell book outlining first-hand accounts of White House officials’ frustration and lack of confidence in the president, who referred to the book as a “work of fiction.”
“This book means nothing,” Trump told reporters.
It’s unclear whether the identity of column’s author will be uncovered. One White House aide even suggested to The Washington Post that the author could be seeking glory and wants to be identified. In any case, it seems unlikely the New York newspaper will ever reveal the official who penned the column.
“Now that the president’s calling for the Times to disclose the identity, are there any circumstances that you could ever conceive under which the Times would share the identity of this person?” Michael Barbaro, host of The Daily podcast, asked James Dao, the Op-Ed editor for the New York Times.
“I cannot,” said Dao.
The new version's battery has a shorter range and a price $4,000 lower than the previous starting price.
- Tesla's new version of the Model 3 costs $45,000 and can travel 260 miles on one charge.
- The Model 3 is the best-selling luxury car in the U.S.
- Tesla still has yet to introduce a fully self-driving car, even though it once offered the capability as an option to be installed at a future date.
We all know sleeping with your ex is a bad idea, or is it?
- In the first study of its kind, researchers have found sex with an ex didn't prevent people from getting over their relationship.
- Instead of feeling worse about their breakup after a hookup, the new singles who attempted sexual contact with their ex reported feeling better afterwards.
- The findings suggest that not every piece of relationship advice is to be taken at face value.
Want a happy, satisfying relationship? Psychologists say the best way is to learn to take a joke.
- New research looks at how partners' attitudes toward humor affects the overall quality of a relationship.
- Out of the three basic types of people, people who love to be laughed at made for better partners.
- Fine-tuning your sense of humor might be the secret to a healthy, happy, and committed relationship.
Tiny and efficient, these biodegradable single cells show promise as a way to target hard-to-reach cancers.
- Scientists in Germany have found a potential improvement on the idea of bacteria delivering medicine.
- This kind of microtargeting could be useful in cancer treatments.
- The microswimmers are biodegradable and easy to produce.
Metin Sitti and colleagues at the Max Planck Institute in Germany recently demonstrated that tiny drugs could be attached to individual algae cells and that those algae cells could then be directed through body-like fluid by a magnetic field.
The results were recently published in Advanced Materials, and the paper as a whole offers up a striking portrait of precision and usefulness, perhaps loosely comparable in overall quality to recent work done by The Yale Quantum Institute. It begins by noting that medicine has been attached to bacteria cells before, but bacteria can multiply and end up causing more harm than good.
A potential solution to the problem seems to have been found in an algal cell: the intended object of delivery is given a different electrical charge than the algal cell, which helps attach the object to the cell. The movement of the algae was then tested in 2D and 3D. (The study calls this cell a 'microswimmer.') It would later be found that "3D mean swimming speed of the algal microswimmers increased more than twofold compared to their 2D mean swimming speed." The study continues —
More interestingly, 3D mean swimming speed of the algal microswimmers in the presence of a uniform magnetic field in the x-direction was approximately threefolds higher than their 2D mean swimming speed.
After the 2D and 3D speed of the algal was examined, it was then tested in something made to approximate human fluid, including what they call 'human tubal fluid' (think of the fallopian tubes), plasma, and blood. They then moved to test the compatibility of the microswimmer with cervical cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, and healthy cells. They found that the microswimmer didn't follow the path of bacteria cells and create something toxic.
The next logical steps from the study include testing this inside a living organism in order to assess the safety of the procedure. Potential future research could include examining how effective this method of drug delivery could be in targeting "diseases in deep body locations," as in, the reproductive and gastrointestinal tracts.
It's hard to imagine such a number. But these images will help you try.
The Mega Millions lottery just passed $1 billion for tonight's drawing.
What does that even look like, when represented by various currencies?
It takes just 6 numbers to win. You can only, however, purchase tickets up until 10:45 ET tonight.
Our modern-day Kafka on his new novel Lake Success and the dark comedy that in 2018 pretty much writes itself
- riding the Greyhounds of hell, from New York to El Paso
- the alternate reality of hedge fund traders
Here's why the school you went to is less relevant than ever.
- Learning agility is the ability to learn new things quickly and be aware of the trends that are emerging in your industry. It's the most important job skill hiring managers should be looking for and job seekers should be putting forward, says Kelly Palmer.
- Want to test your learning agility? Answer this practice interview question: "What did you learn last week?"
- Hiring people based on the school they went to is less relevant than ever. Why? Palmer explains: "If I asked you, "Tell me about your health," and you told me you ran a marathon 10 years ago, does that really tell me what your health is like? Not really." It's what you can offer now and how agile you are that matters.
- Kelly Palmer is the author of The Expertise Economy.
By 2022, there may be as many as three artificial moons floating above the city of Chengdu.
- Chinese state media announced plans to put an artificial moon in orbit by 2020.
- Just like the real moon, the artificial moon will reflect sunlight onto the Earth in order to cut down on electricity consumption.
- If the mission is a success, there are plans to launch three other artificial moons in 2022.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.