With tens of thousands of satellites requiring AI-control to avoid collisions, a single solar flare could everything.
Over the next few years, the night sky and the volume of space that surrounds the Earth are both poised to become very different than they’ve been for all of human history. As of 2019, humanity had launched an estimated total of between 8,000 and 9,000 satellites, with approximately 2,000 of them still active. As SpaceX’s Starlink, OneWeb, Amazon’s Project Kuiper, Telesat and other companies prepare to provide worldwide 5G coverage from space (more than 300 new satellites have gone up for these purposes in the last 9 months), humanity is beginning to enter the era of satellite mega-constellations.
While media coverage has largely mentioned only one detrimental effect so far — the damage that these satellites are already causing to astronomy — there’s a second consequence that could be even more disastrous: Kessler syndrome. With tens or even hundreds of thousands of satellites in orbit, a single collision could trigger a chain reaction. With the realities of solar flares and the technological needs of mega-constellations, this new type of natural disaster may be unavoidable.
The idea of Kessler syndrome is a simple one: if there are too many satellites around Earth, an unfortunate collision between any two of them could create enough debris that another collision becomes inevitable. Although there is not widespread agreement on when that point will be reached, it’s widely recognized that greater numbers of larger satellites greatly increases this risk. With Starlink alone proposing a total of 42,000 satellites in three different orbital shells and many other companies sure to soon follow suit, the danger of Kessler syndrome is poised to increase by orders of magnitude over the 2020s.
In prior years, satellites were launched into orbits that were tracked and knowable, but with occasional collisions occurring due to inactive satellites whose orbits were decaying due to atmospheric drag. With mega-constellations, however, artificial intelligence will be entering the picture, and this poses a tremendous danger.
With so many objects in orbit at the same altitude, artificial intelligence will be required in order to constantly leverage the on-board thrusters to accomplish three main goals:
- to ensure the correct, continuous spacing of the satellites to provide the necessary internet coverage,
- to compensate for the drag of Earth’s atmosphere,
- and to perform any necessary boosts or orbital alterations to avoid collisions with other satellites.
This last point is absolutely critical. Any two orbits at the same altitude always have two points where they will cross, and satellite drift would make a collision inevitable. Only by having the satellites correct their own courses in real-time can they ensure a collision-free scenario.
But this plan comes along with a catastrophic scenario: what if the satellites are rendered non-responsive by some event? If constant orbital corrections are needed in order to avoid collisions with other satellites, the worst thing that could happen would be a scenario that paralyzed the satellites and made them unable to respond to not only the artificial intelligence, but to a manual command.
This is not some science-fiction horror scenario, but something as inevitable as the Sun itself: space weather. Events like solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and even the plain old solar wind all send charged particles away from the Sun. When they happen to get sent on their way towards planet Earth, our surface is protected by our world’s magnetic field and our atmosphere. The danger to humans or any biological organism is essentially zero, with the largest effect that commonly occurs being a spectacular looking auroral display.
But in space, even in low-Earth orbit, the atmosphere offers no protection, and the magnetic field offers no guarantee of redirecting these particles away from satellites. According to NOAA:
Solar Energetic Particles (energetic protons) can penetrate satellite electronics and cause electrical failure. These energetic particles also block radio communications at high latitudes in during Solar Radiation Storms.
Right now, the Sun is in the quietest part of its periodic solar cycle. On timescales of 11 years, the number of sunspots — which correlates directly with the odds of flaring activity and coronal mass ejections — goes from essentially zero (a quiet Sun) to solar maximum and back to zero again. Right now, in 2020, we’re just leaving the last solar minimum, with the next maximum anticipated to occur in 2024 or 2025 and every 11 years after that.
There’s a tremendous danger to satellites whenever this type of space weather impacts them. If these energetic protons cause any type of electrical failure in these satellites, they will be unable to adjust their course via artificial intelligence or any other means. If they cannot adjust their course, the question of any two of these satellites colliding becomes a game of Russian roulette, where there are likely to be a series of near-misses before the inevitable — an in-space collision between two of them — occurs.
The worst-case scenario, and this scenario gets worse with every new large satellite that goes up (and every communications satellite is “large” by this metric), is that each collision increases both the likelihood and frequency of in-orbit collisions. In short order, potentially just weeks or months, the region around Earth will become a debris field, with a significant percent of existing satellites destroyed.
At present, every space disaster, including collisions and failed missions that have exploded or malfunctioned in various ways, means that there are perhaps a few hundred thousand pieces of space debris the size of your fingernail or larger. These are already hazardous to our existing satellites, with one of them colliding with the International Space Station just a few years ago, cracking a window.
But with hundreds of thousands of large satellites, a single collision could set off a catastrophic chain reaction like we’ve never seen. In short order, the number of pieces of space debris could rise into the tens of millions, impacting satellites in both low-Earth orbit and medium-Earth orbit. The first company whose satellites cause such a disaster would likely impact every other one, to say nothing of military and scientific satellites presently in orbit. Not only will satellite technology become an impossibility for decades or even many generations, but routine space launches will become an enormous gamble.
The greatest danger that the Sun poses to Earth today is a large-scale coronal mass ejection, which — if it heads right for us with the wrong magnetic field orientation — could lead to a wide-scale electrical catastrophe that could knock out power grids all over the Earth, starting fires and causing trillions of dollar in damage to our infrastructure.
However, a series of solar telescopes and observatories offers a potential solution. By monitoring the Sun:
- from Earth, with observatories such as the NSF’s Inouye Solar Telescope,
- from in orbit around the Sun, such as with NASA’s Parker Solar Probe and ESA’s Solar Orbiter,
- from the L1 Lagrange point, with observatories like NASA’s SOHO and Solar Dynamics Observatory,
- and from in orbit around Earth, like with Japan’s Hinode satellite,
we can monitor space weather as soon as it gets ejected from the Sun, assessing the risk to our planet while the space weather is on its way.
This can get us up to three or four days of lead time for most space weather events, and even ~18 hours of advance notice for the most powerful, fastest-moving events of all. Whereas a coronal mass ejection needs to possess specific properties to pose a risk to Earth’s infrastructure, satellites in orbit above Earth are in a far more precarious position. In order to ensure that a solar flare directed at us doesn’t lead to Kessler syndrome, the following precautions could prevent an otherwise inevitable disaster.
When a solar flare is emitted from the Sun, all mega-constellations of satellites must enter a pre-planned “safe route” orbit. Passive orbits that are explicitly designed to maximize the distance between satellites for the largest amount of time into the future could buy us, at the very least, years of time until a collision occurs: enough time that even in the worst-case scenario, we could launch an emergency mission to intercept and de-orbit any broken satellites. But only if we build that failsafe into the infrastructure from the beginning.
If we fail to prepare, a “Flaremageddon” natural disaster scenario becomes easy to envision. Imagine that it’s 2025, and we have over 10,000 new mega-constellation satellites up there, with a series of sunspots appearing around the Sun’s equator. A magnetic reconnection event occurs, launching an X-class solar flare with a coronal mass ejection right at Earth. The magnetic field is oriented so that a geomagnetic storm occurs, knocking out some major electrical grids in the process.
But in space, a large fraction of satellites get bombarded by these energetic particles from the Sun, causing them to become non-responsive. 8 days later, the first collision occurs. While humanity scrambles to respond appropriately, the second collision occurs, and the chain reaction begins. By 2027, the International Space Station is abandoned, and the Hubble Space Telescope is destroyed. It’s an entirely avoidable disaster, but unless we get ready for it now, it may be too late when the critical moment arrives.
Starts With A Bang is now on Forbes, and republished on Medium on a 7-day delay. Ethan has authored two books, Beyond The Galaxy, and Treknology: The Science of Star Trek from Tricorders to Warp Drive.