Two New Particles Have Sent Physicists Scrambling for Theories

Two new particles, one maybe seen and one theoretical, have the physics community buzzing.

Trying to make sense of things

There’s excitement in the physics community over a couple of new particles: One they may have observed, and a theoretical description of another that would solve a vexing galactic mystery.


The first one may or may not really exist, but evidence for it has been accumulating since last year. "If this thing is true, it’s huge. It’s very different than what the last 30 years of particle physics looked like," according to theoretical physicist David Kaplan of Johns Hopkins. In 2015, two separate teams found the same unexpected spikes of high-energy photons (light particles) in the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. Discovered inside debris from proton-on-proton collisions, these could be signs of a particle similar to the Higgs boson, but 12 times heavier. While they could well be a fluke, the fact that both the CMS and ATLAS teams picked up the spikes is tantalizing.

Dean Mouhtaropoulos  

What’s weird about this is that it may indicate a “750-billion-electron-volt beast decaying to two photons,” as Caltech’s Maria Spiropulu put it. And this is not something physics predicts as possible. The ATLAS team detected 40 unexplained pairs of protons and the CMS team 10, and since this is out of 400 trillion proton collisions, the mystery particle is either really rare, or an error.

As more data is now being collected by the teams, 300 papers proposing explanations for the phenomenon have been written and are awaiting review at arXiv.org, and four newly published papers distill the most popular theories about what’s going on.

m.jrn

The second particle is just theoretical at this point, but it could explain what happened to all of the lithium physicists have long expected to be left over from the start of the universe. They’ve been able to accurately predict the amount of helium and deuterium created by the “Big Bang nucleosynthesis,” but their equations also predict an amount of lithium they just can’t find. Edwin Cartlidge at Physics World explains of the Big Bang: "This process generated deuterium, large amounts of helium-4 and smaller amounts of helium-3—the latter two combined to create beryllium-7, which eventually decayed to lithium-7.” But there’s two to five times less of it than there should be. Where’d all that lithium go?

Antoine 2K

The newly proposed particle, “Particle X,” would have to be electrically neutral, stable, and interact strongly with protons and neutrons. Maxim Pospelov of the Perimeter Institute, Waterloo, Canada suggests Particle X could have reduced the amount of lithium in either of two ways: by breaking up beryllium nuclei before they could form lithium, or by releasing neurons from deuterium that would destroy lithium. Pospelov says his team's proposal for Particle X could also be describing the suspected mediator particle between normal and dark matter.

One seen—maybe—and one definitely not, but these two particles have segments of the physics community buzzing. Scientists’ understanding of physics is clearly still in its infancy compared to all there is left to figure out.

 

 

Preview image: Dean Mouhtaropoulos 

U.S. Navy controls inventions that claim to change "fabric of reality"

Inventions with revolutionary potential made by a mysterious aerospace engineer for the U.S. Navy come to light.

U.S. Navy ships

Credit: Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • U.S. Navy holds patents for enigmatic inventions by aerospace engineer Dr. Salvatore Pais.
  • Pais came up with technology that can "engineer" reality, devising an ultrafast craft, a fusion reactor, and more.
  • While mostly theoretical at this point, the inventions could transform energy, space, and military sectors.
Keep reading Show less

Are we in an AI summer or AI winter?

Neither. We are entering an AI autumn.

Credit: Jesse Chan via Unsplash
13-8
  • The history of AI shows boom periods (AI summers) followed by busts (AI winters).
  • The cyclical nature of AI funding is due to hype and promises not fulfilling expectations.
  • This time, we might enter something resembling an AI autumn rather than an AI winter, but fundamental questions remain if true AI is even possible.
Keep reading Show less

How WallStreetBets “hype” spreads among investors like a virus

A new study explores how investors' behavior is affected by participating in online communities, like Reddit's WallStreetBets.

WallStreetBets reddit page

Rafael Henrique via Adobe Stock
Mind & Brain
  • The study found evidence that "hype" over assets is psychologically contagious among investors in online communities.
  • This hype is self-perpetuating: A small group of investors hypes an asset, bringing in new investors, until growth becomes unsteady and a price crash ensues.
  • The researchers suggested that these new kinds of self-organized, social media-driven investment behaviors are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.
Keep reading Show less
Strange Maps

The ‘Lost Forty’: how a mapping error preserved an old-growth forest

A 19th-century surveying mistake kept lumberjacks away from what is now Minnesota's largest patch of old-growth trees.

Quantcast