Megamergers Mean 3 Companies = Most of the World’s Food

Three massive mergers threaten to put control of the world’s food in dangerously few hands.


In April 2017, regulators in Europe and the United States signed off on a huge $43 billion agricultural merger between ChemChina and Swiss seed company Syngenta. Two other farming mega-mergers are making their way through the approvals pipeline as well, one between Bayer and Monsanto, and another between Dow Chemical and DuPont. If all of them are finalized, just three countries — the U.S., China, and Germany — will control the majority of the entire world’s food supply. The International Pane of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems says, “an unprecedented wave of corporate consolidation is under way.”

Shenzhen Stock exchange (JAY STERLING AUSTIN)

The mergers could mean that more countries will move to a single system of industrial agriculture that would leave little room for smaller, independent farmers, and could also result in a dangerous uniformity of livestock — both of which leave the world food supply highly vulnerable to catastrophe. Diversity in crops and farm animals is an important defense against decimation of the world food supply from a single disease or genetic mishap.

Even before the mergers, just six or seven companies play an oversized role in agriculture, according to The Guardian. After the mergers? Just three companies will control about 60% of the world’s seeds, nearly 70% of its agricultural chemicals and pesticides, and almost all of its genetically modified (GM) seeds.

These mergers aren’t the only developments that have EU, US and Latin American food experts worried. There have also been mergers of major fertilizer companies, and the largest farm equipment manufacturers have been envisioning future agriculture as being based on massive data collection and analysis, robotics, and remote farm surveillance. Seed developers — and the pharmaceutical industry — aren’t far behind. “When you sequence a human genome, or a seed, what you get out of it is data,” CEO of Ark Investment firm Catherine Wood tells The Guardian.

As far as reining in the dominance of the new mega-companies, it’s not likely to happen. They’re such massive contributors to the economies of their countries that they’ll be able to block and limiting legislation. Silvia Ribeiro, director of ETC’s Latin American office in Mexico, tells The Guardian that there’s “huge pressure from these giant companies to make laws and regulations in our countries that allow them to dominate markets, crush farmers’ rights and make peasant seeds illegal.”

The economic effects could be absolutely brutal, says Adrian Bebb of Friends of Earth Europe: “From Africa and Asia to Latin America and the EU, corporate control over markets and supply chains is displacing millions of small-scale farmers. These dynamics have created some of the world’s highest rates of poverty and hunger among small-scale food producers and rural communities worldwide.”

A quick glance at the companies in these mergers also clearly signals how they envision the future of food: Syngenta, DuPont, and Monsanto are all heavyweights in the field of genetically modified (GM) foods. 

In the case of China, GM seeds could potentially solve a pressing problem: China doesn’t have enough arable land to feed its own people. It’s the largest importer in the world of soybeans, and the seventh largest importer of corn. The country’s still-growing population, with its booming middle class, is demanding more meat and dairy than they have historically. 

China sees hope in Syngenta’s GM seed lines that are engineered to withstand rough and pests. This is long-term thinking, though, since GM foods are currently just as unpopular in China now as they are elsewhere, and have in fact been tightly controlled by the central government. Though China imports GM foods, the agricultural ministry has only ever approved one GM crop for cultivation: papaya.

Beginning in 2014, however, the Chinese government’s attitude seems to be changing. President Xi Jinping, looking ahead, predicted China would “take the commanding heights in biotechnology, and not let large foreign companies dominate the agricultural biotechnology product market.” China Central Television stopped airing anti-GM ads, the agriculture ministry created a “green channel” to make it easier to register new seed lines, and the country began revising its laws to make collaboration between researchers and the private sector easier.

It’s probably also because China is interested in being a dominant force in biotech, and Syngenta could be their golden ticket. Taipei agricultural consultant Loren Putte tells Science, “Before the deal there was no chance that [China] could create a national champion company to compete with the likes of DuPont and Monsanto.”

FAO building in Rome

In May, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) Committee on Food Security meets in Rome, and there are other meetings planned elsewhere — including Mexico and Indonesia — where activists will speak out and try to put the brakes to these mergers. Powerful farm movements have been growing in developing countries, and members plan to make their voices heard at these gatherings.

As activist Silvia Ribeiro says, “Virtually all of the world’s governments, farmer organizations and many agribusinesses companies will be in the same room for a week, with food security on the official agenda. There are going to be a lot of angry people there wanting to stop these mergers.”

Befriend your ideological opposite. It’s fun.

Step inside the unlikely friendship of a former ACLU president and an ultra-conservative Supreme Court Justice.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia were unlikely friends. They debated each other at events all over the world, and because of that developed a deep and rewarding friendship – despite their immense differences.
  • Scalia, a famous conservative, was invited to circles that were not his "home territory", such as the ACLU, to debate his views. Here, Strossen expresses her gratitude and respect for his commitment to the exchange of ideas.
  • "It's really sad that people seem to think that if you disagree with somebody on some issues you can't be mutually respectful, you can't enjoy each other's company, you can't learn from each other and grow in yourself," says Strossen.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

3 ways to find a meaningful job, or find purpose in the job you already have

Learn how to redesign your job for maximum reward.

Videos
  • Broaching the question "What is my purpose?" is daunting – it's a grandiose idea, but research can make it a little more approachable if work is where you find your meaning. It turns out you can redesign your job to have maximum purpose.
  • There are 3 ways people find meaning at work, what Aaron Hurst calls the three elevations of impact. About a third of the population finds meaning at an individual level, from seeing the direct impact of their work on other people. Another third of people find their purpose at an organizational level. And the last third of people find meaning at a social level.
  • "What's interesting about these three elevations of impact is they enable us to find meaning in any job if we approach it the right way. And it shows how accessible purpose can be when we take responsibility for it in our work," says Hurst.
Keep reading Show less

Physicist advances a radical theory of gravity

Erik Verlinde has been compared to Einstein for completely rethinking the nature of gravity.

Photo by Willeke Duijvekam
Surprising Science
  • The Dutch physicist Erik Verlinde's hypothesis describes gravity as an "emergent" force not fundamental.
  • The scientist thinks his ideas describe the universe better than existing models, without resorting to "dark matter".
  • While some question his previous papers, Verlinde is reworking his ideas as a full-fledged theory.
Keep reading Show less

UPS has been discreetly using self-driving trucks to deliver cargo

TuSimple, an autonomous trucking company, has also engaged in test programs with the United States Postal Service and Amazon.


PAUL RATJE / Contributor
Technology & Innovation
  • This week, UPS announced that it's working with autonomous trucking startup TuSimple on a pilot project to deliver cargo in Arizona using self-driving trucks.
  • UPS has also acquired a minority stake in TuSimple.
  • TuSimple hopes its trucks will be fully autonomous — without a human driver — by late 2020, though regulatory questions remain.
Keep reading Show less