Prof. Krugman VS Tim Geithner, to whom will be right? (Part I)

Prof. Krugman VS Tim Geithner, to whom will be right? (Part I)\r\n \r\n To Geithner’plan , Prof. Krugman asserted that he will fail all the programs. It is totally permissive and out of evidence, a kind of assertion only could by made by HK academics………..please see Part II \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Prof. Krugman VS Tim Geithner, to whom will be right? (Part I) First I would like to thank the young, hungry and innocent Mr. Geithner to stay on the most pressured job, Treasury Secretary. Young, for a 40+, he is young and not has very much experience in risk management. Hungry, who does not want to be TS? Innocent, he thinks he can handle the cunning and old Washington Politicians and the dogged media! Result, Mr. Geithner appeared lost 5 to 15 pounds because the pressure and hard work drove him loss weight. Buddy! You’d better taken Tai Chi exercise to clam down your stress and anxiety. And I hope Mr. Geithner is not Wall Street Trojan horse. Otherwise, I will "grass-mud-horse!( Chinese Joke!") (However, I suspect his predecessor may be either a Trojan horse of Wall Street or GS. Ask Lehman Brothers’ Richard Fuld , he may tell you!) Now comes to Prof. Paul Krugman. Same old words: I love Prof. Krugman, but I would love the truth more. The truth is that, Prof. Krugman criticized Geithner’s Public-Private Investment Program in his column, on March 23, 2009 NYT with his prediction in black and white Financial Policy Despair: It (Geithner’s plan) almost surely will fail! To my surprise, Prof. Krugman even didn’t wait to see the original copy came out, he concluded his prediction based on the leaked from The Times and other newspaper editions. During the 1998 Hong Kong Economic storm, I had seen and heard so many this kinds of "assertions!" No data , without any statistics and even not his specialty, the HK U very famous (in HKU famous not mean he is good!), economics major Professor Cheung XX predicted: If Hong Kong Government purchased stocks with tax payer’s money, Hong Kong will be dead because the governmental intervention! Result: He was dead wrong, HK survived! In hindsight, even his mentor, the late Milton Friedman admitted that: Economy is not science; HK Government may be right to intervene the market in an extraordinally time! Academics are always wrong, especially in the extraordinally time. Readers should take note: most Economy Schools in HK are not very high standard as US, So, does the Economy professor. Former economics Prof. Cheung XX of HKU made such silly assertion, not a bit of surprise to me. Difference, form most HK Economic Professors and Prof. Friedman. Prof. Krugman and I both support the intervention. Prudent is risk, waiting is danger! We both agree Big and Quick ferderal intervention. To my surprise Prof. Krugman still insists Swedish model to nationalize the bank (I oppose). Readers should read the article: Self-assembly Solution of March, 17 ,2009 of Financial Time about the bail out Swedish model. Here I quote some lines from it : "Contrary to the myth that surrounds the Swedish model, the Authorities nationalized only two banks- Nork Banken and Gota Banken ( This Author noted, Gota already in bankruptcy when it was nationalized!) The Authorities admitted that they were small banks not as big as City or Bank of America! And Sweden was not in recession like US kind at that time and they said: "May be we are successful, we will never know!" FT summarized this kind of feeling: Disconcerting! I doubt Prof. Krugman red this article! Now comes another truth of Mr. Geithner’s Public-Private Investment Program, to my understand, it has two key parts, "The two key elements of the plan are: • Legacy Loans Program: a program to combine an FDIC guarantee of debt financing with equity capital from the private sector and the Treasury to support the purchase of troubled loans from insured depository institutions. • Legacy Securities Program: a program to combine financing from the Federal Reserve and Treasury through the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility ("TALF") with equity capital from the private sector and the Treasury to address the problem of troubled securities." (Quoted from the Treasury white paper) To Geithner’plan , Prof. Krugman asserted that he will fail all the programs. It is totally permissive and out of evidence, a kind of assertion only could by made by HK academics………..please see Part II

China’s artificial sun reaches fusion temperature: 100 million degrees

In a breakthrough for nuclear fusion research, scientists at China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor have produced temperatures necessary for nuclear fusion on Earth.

Credit: EAST Team
Surprising Science
  • The EAST reactor was able to heat hydrogen to temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius.
  • Nuclear fusion could someday provide the planet with a virtually limitless supply of clean energy.
  • Still, scientists have many other obstacles to pass before fusion technology becomes a viable energy source.
Keep reading Show less

Project 100,000: The Vietnam War's cruel and deadly experiment

Military recruits are supposed to be assessed to see whether they're fit for service. What happens when they're not?

Flickr user Tommy Truong79
Politics & Current Affairs
  • During the Vietnam War, Robert McNamara began a program called Project 100,000.
  • The program brought over 300,000 men to Vietnam who failed to meet minimum criteria for military service, both physically and mentally.
  • Project 100,000 recruits were killed in disproportionate numbers and fared worse after their military service than their civilian peers, making the program one of the biggest—and possibly cruelest—mistakes of the Vietnam War.
Keep reading Show less

Here's how diverse the 116th Congress is set to become

The 116th Congress is set to break records in term of diversity among its lawmakers, though those changes are coming almost entirely from Democrats.

(Photo: MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Women and nonwhite candidates made record gains in the 2018 midterms.
  • In total, almost half of the newly elected Congressional representatives are not white men.
  • Those changes come almost entirely from Democrats; Republican members-elect are all white men except for one woman.
Keep reading Show less