Part 1 - Change from within - leadership in a different direction

tWhen Scott put out his initial request for guest bloggers on school leadership, we (Justin Medved and Dennis Harter) considered whether we fit the bill.  We are not school heads or principals, but rather a different kind of leadership that is emerging in this current era of technological change and efforts in education to use this change positively.


We are Technology and Learning Coordinators at International School Bangkok.  Our primary role is to lead teachers toward embedded technology use, enhancing learning opportunities in the classroom and beyond.


More and more however, we find that school leadership looks to us to guide and inform on all sorts of decision-making, ranging from curriculum to hiring practice to processes involved in running the school. 


This defines a new kind of leadership in schools � one that breaks down typical hierarchical set-ups into one of collaboration and deferred expertise.  One that is less top down and one that is more shared � at least in some areas.  Ultimately, the buck continues to stop at the top, but input and influence seems to be growing from the "middle".


Currently, many school administrators and curricular leaders are not "up-to-date" or savvy on current ed tech thinking or even on current technology tools.  They lead from an understanding of traditional schools attached to isolated IT classes with computer labs for student use.  They don't grasp the possibilities of a participatory web or realize the true potential of the "network" (social and hardware).


For the most part, this is not because they don't want to change, but because they don't know what's possible.  This speaks less to their skills as an administrator and more to their backgrounds as educators.  It is a credit to those administrators who recognize a changing landscape and ask for guidance from those in the know.


So they come to us.


We work in this dual role, convincing administration of directions we need to move, while at the same time working for teacher buy in.  Administration defers to our expertise in these matters. 


Both may be considered the jobs of the administrators, yet both jobs fall on the guys with the ideas and the people skills to get it done.


Do you have a similar situation in your schools?  If you are reading this as a technology-type, what is your role in this alternative leadership?  How much responsibility/say do you have?


Justin and I often tackle the question,

what does it take to bring administration on board to make significant change in schools, curricular or otherwise?


This week we'd like to share with you the process that we went through from both a leadership side as well as a curricular side.  We are in the process now, because we are trusted to do so, of moving ISB forward into a model of embedded technology founded on the Essential Questions of the 21st Century Learner.  This curricular model has come directly from us rather than the curriculum office because we see a need for a different way to approach learning with technology. 


In the coming posts, Justin and I will take you through our thinking on this curricular model with two purposes:

  1. To get feedback from you and to push our thinking forward.
  2. \n\n
  3. To hopefully inspire thinking at your own schools about how to best "embed" technology into classrooms so that is accessible to teachers and agrees with the way children live with technology.

This is a terrific opportunity to speak to a different audience than the readers we have already have at our own blogs (and those who have seen us present), so thanks, Scott. We are looking forward to the week.


Justin Medved, Dennis Harter, Guest Bloggers


Tomorrow's Post: "Birth of a question and a concept" - How does an information and technology curriculum stay relevant and meaningful in the 21st Century?


Cross Posted at: Medagogy and Thinking Allowed


Malcolm Gladwell live | How to re-examine everything you know

Join Radiolab's Latif Nasser at 1pm ET on Monday as he chats with Malcolm Gladwell live on Big Think.

Big Think LIVE

Add event to your calendar

AppleGoogleOffice 365OutlookOutlook.comYahoo

Keep reading Show less

Humans evolved for punching, study confirms

University of Utah research finds that men are especially well suited for fisticuffs.

Image source: durantelallera/Shutterstock
Surprising Science
  • With males having more upper-body mass than women, a study looks to find the reason.
  • The study is based on the assumption that men have been fighters for so long that evolution has selected those best-equipped for the task.
  • If men fought other men, winners would have survived and reproduced, losers not so much.
Keep reading Show less

To be a great innovator, learn to embrace and thrive in uncertainty

Innovators don't ignore risk; they are just better able to analyze it in uncertain situations.

David McNew/Getty Images
Personal Growth
Madam C.J. Walker, born Sarah Breedlove, was America's first female self-made millionaire.
Keep reading Show less

Study: Private prisons result in more inmates, longer sentences

The Labour Economics study suggests two potential reasons for the increase: corruption and increased capacity.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • After adopting strict sentencing laws in the '80s and '90s, many states have turned to for-profit prisons to handle growing prison populations.
  • A new study in Labour Economics found that privately-run prisons correlate with a rise in incarceration rates and sentence lengths.
  • While evidence is mixed, private prisons do not appear to improve recidivism or cost less than state-run facilities.
  • Keep reading Show less

    The art of asking the right questions

    What exactly does "questions are the new answers" mean?

    Scroll down to load more…