You Think That Diver’s Hot? It’s Okay to Say So.
The Olympics gives spectators permission to say things about athletes’ bodies that they would never say in polite company.
Article written by guest writer Kecia Lynn
What’s the Latest Development?
Guardian columnist Zoe Williams suggests that we throw out the political correctness rule book and openly admit to our awe of Olympic competitors’ bodies: “For these weeks only, watching these near-deities for whom every muscle has a purpose and every tweak of a body hair is a bid for greatness, we are allowed to make remarks we would never normally make. We're allowed to gawp at perfection, marvel at beauty, openly wish we could prod chests and have a go on triceps – it's the Olympic Gaze, an objectification amnesty.”
What’s the Big Idea?
Williams points out two key factors that make this unabashed admiration acceptable: the almost equal balance of commentary between male and female physiques, and the undeniable connection between the individual competitor’s body and their use of it: “When the perfection has a purpose, you get a sense of the bodies having a mind of their own. The normal business of objectification always downplays the fact that the body is attached to a person…Contrawise, you do not debase when you go on about an athlete's thighs; her body is indivisible from her life's work, it can clear 100 metres' worth of hurdles in 12.54 seconds; it is her pride and joy. To say she's perfect is like telling someone they have cute children.”
Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
The way that you think about stress can actually transform the effect that it has on you – and others.
- Stress is contagious, and the higher up in an organization you are the more your stress will be noticed and felt by others.
- Kelly McGonigal teaches "Reset your mindset to reduce stress" for Big Think Edge.
- Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
These quick bursts of inspiration will brighten your day in 10 minutes or less.
Explore a legendary philosopher's take on how society fails to prepare us for education and progress.
- Alan Watts was an instrumental figure in the 1960s counterculture revolution.
- He believed that we put too much of a focus on intangible goals for our educational and professional careers.
- Watts believed that the whole educational enterprise is a farce compared to how we should be truly living our lives.
How can we use the resources that are already on the Moon to make human exploration of the satellite as economical as possible?
If you were transported to the Moon this very instant, you would surely and rapidly die. That's because there's no atmosphere, the surface temperature varies from a roasting 130 degrees Celsius (266 F) to a bone-chilling minus 170 C (minus 274 F). If the lack of air or horrific heat or cold don't kill you then micrometeorite bombardment or solar radiation will. By all accounts, the Moon is not a hospitable place to be.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.