States Using Anti-Smoking Funds to Cover Budget Crises
Proper distribution of cigarette taxes and money from the checks written by the tobacco industries to tobacco control programs could help reduce personal healthcare expenses
Article written by guest writer Rin Mitchell
What’s the Latest Development?
A recent Center for Disease Control (CDC) report reveals states across the U.S. are not investing enough to get a firm grasp on tobacco-related illnesses. The billions of dollars collected from taxes on cigarettes and the tobacco companies by states and the federal government is more than enough to fund tobacco prevention programs, smoking cessation services and other public health entities—as well as tobacco-free ad campaigns. Yet, the CDC calculates that these programs are only seeing less than one-fifth of the money. It is not regulated as to how the money acquired is to be spent; therefore, budget recovery is priority for the states—where the majority of the money is used. So it should come as no surprise that reports also indicate that everyday nearly 3,800 American kids are striking up a cigarette for the first time and 1,000 of these kids develop a regular habit.
What’s the Big Idea?
The growing consumption of tobacco is doing the American economy well right now. The government is concerned more with the full recovery of the economy than saving lives, so distributing the money in the areas primarily intended—caring for people with smoke-related diseases and prevention programs for kids—which could lower personal health care expenses, are not a priority.
Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.
- Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
- At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
- Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Can sensitive coral reefs survive another human generation?
- Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them, says author David Wallace-Wells. He posits that without meaningful changes to policies, the trend of them dying out, even in light of recent advances, will continue.
- The World Wildlife Fund says that 60 percent of all vertebrate mammals have died since just 1970. On top of this, recent studies suggest that insect populations may have fallen by as much as 75 percent over the last few decades.
- If it were not for our oceans, the planet would probably be already several degrees warmer than it is today due to the emissions we've expelled into the atmosphere.
Research has shown that men today have less testosterone than they used to. What's happening?
- Several studies have confirmed that testosterone counts in men are lower than what they used to be just a few decades ago.
- While most men still have perfectly healthy testosterone levels, its reduction puts men at risk for many negative health outcomes.
- The cause of this drop in testosterone isn't entirely clear, but evidence suggests that it is a multifaceted result of modern, industrialized life.
Michael Dowling, Northwell Health's CEO, believes we're entering the age of smart medicine.
- The United States health care system has much room for improvement, and big tech may be laying the foundation for those improvements.
- Technological progress in medicine is coming from two fronts: medical technology and information technology.
- As information technology develops, patients will become active participants in their health care, and value-based care may become a reality.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.