This Is (Still) The Asteroid Most Likely To Cause Global Havoc
Originally given a 1-in-300 chance of hitting Earth -- 50 percent higher than the average for all other near-Earth objects located to date -- 1950 DA has had its odds reassessed. Fortunately it's not expected to arrive for another 866 years.
Kecia Lynn has worked as a technical writer, editor, software developer, arts administrator, summer camp director, and television host. A graduate of Case Western Reserve University and the Iowa Writers' Workshop, she is currently living in Iowa City and working on her first novel.
What's the Latest Development?
Recent research by NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) scientists on 1950 DA -- a 1.1-kilometer-wide asteroid first spotted in 1950 and seen again in 2000 and 2001 -- confirms past calculations that of all the asteroids and other near-Earth objects located to date, it's the one most likely to collide with the Earth in the future. Previous research put the odds at 1 in 300 at the most, which is "a risk 50% greater than that of the average hazard due to all other asteroids from now to then." The new study applies a law of physics known as the Yarkovsky effect to the asteroid's trajectory. Its impact risk now measures -0.58 on NASA's Palermo Scale, which qualifies it for "careful monitoring."
What's the Big Idea?
Fortunately the JPL team knows the date of 1950 DA's possible arrival: March 16, 2880. This gives them plenty of time to figure out ways to divert it if necessary. The key phrase is "if necessary": Although the asteroid's orbit has been plotted, several other factors in addition to the Yarkovsky effect could affect a future collision. Combined with the probability risk, the team is fairly confident that humans living 866 years from now won't need to worry about 1950 DA.
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.