Study: Playing Office Politics Really Doesn't Pay

In a study that challenges conventional wisdom, two researchers determine that deftly playing office politics has a tendency to backfire.

Conventional wisdom would lead us to believe that people who succeed in the knock-down, drag-out arena of office politics are just as successful at obtaining raises, promotions, and other concessions. Apologies to all you neo-Machiavellis out there, but that conventional wisdom is flawed, according to a pair of German psychologists. As reported by the British Psychological Society's Research Digest blog, savvy politicians might actually be at a disadvantage in the workplace:

"Study authors Ingo Zettler and Jonas Lang noted a conundrum in their field: Researchers treat political skill as a uniform good, the more the better, yet a meta-analysis of relevant research (PDF) found a spotty relationship between more political skill and improved outcomes like job performance."

Zettler and Lang's study, published in Applied Psychology, points to two key reasons why office politicians tend to be poor workers. First, office politics breeds distrust. Smooth operators thus tend to alienate their peers. That ends up damaging a workplace's collaborative atmosphere and results in diminished productivity from the office politician.

Second, office politics is addicting. Just think about how gossip spreads in the workplace, even when you try and commit yourself to not being an agent of information. The same goes for persistent office politicians who often slip too deeply into the game at the expense of their job performance. 

Zettler and Lang conducted a pair of studies that confirmed their assertions, though Alex Fradera (who authored the BPS Research Digest piece) notes that the research was not without its flaws. Still, the findings are on solid ground: Those who are intermediately savvy in office politics fare much better than those who are extremely political. Unsurprisingly, people at the other end of the scale without much political skill found similar struggles to their extremely savvy peers.

So is this a lesson in moderation? Probably. It might also just be a warning that office politics can be poison to those who devote too much of themselves to playing the game. At the end of the day, the best way to protect your job is not to kiss butt all the time, but instead by focusing on your work performance.

Read more at BPS Research Digest.

Below, TIME Magazine's Jeffrey Kluger analyzes the narcissistic tendencies of major political figures. Hey, if office politics doesn't work out for you, you can always consider being president:

Photo: jorgeantonio / iStock

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Dead – yes, dead – tardigrade found beneath Antarctica

A completely unexpected discovery beneath the ice.

(Goldstein Lab/Wkikpedia/Tigerspaws/Big Think)
Surprising Science
  • Scientists find remains of a tardigrade and crustaceans in a deep, frozen Antarctic lake.
  • The creatures' origin is unknown, and further study is ongoing.
  • Biology speaks up about Antarctica's history.
Keep reading Show less

Physicists puzzled by strange numbers that could explain reality

Eight-dimensional octonions may hold the clues to solve fundamental mysteries.

Surprising Science
  • Physicists discover complex numbers called octonions that work in 8 dimensions.
  • The numbers have been found linked to fundamental forces of reality.
  • Understanding octonions can lead to a new model of physics.
Keep reading Show less

Why are women more religious than men? Because men are more willing to take risks.

It's one factor that can help explain the religiosity gap.

Photo credit: Alina Strong on Unsplash
Culture & Religion
  • Sociologists have long observed a gap between the religiosity of men and women.
  • A recent study used data from several national surveys to compare religiosity, risk-taking preferences and demographic information among more than 20,000 American adolescents.
  • The results suggest that risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity.
Keep reading Show less