Solar Storm Swallows the Earth
The largest solar storm since 2005 has engulfed the Earth, surrounding it in solar radiation capable of disrupting satellite communication. This time, however, the Earth seems to have lucked out.
What's the Latest Development?
Unless you live at northern latitudes and have seen strong auroras in the night sky, you probably won't be affected by the solar storm that has currently engulfed the Earth in radiation. Even though the sun has fired the most radioactive plasma at us since 2003, the planet's electrical systems will likely remain unscathed thanks to the current state of our magnetosphere. Forecasters are predicting a moderate and fairly typical geomagnetic storm, measuring two or three on a scale of five.
What's the Big Idea?
The Earth, in a sense, lucked out. The degree to which the planet is affected by radiation from space is always one part radiation, one part protective magnetosphere. If the clouds of magnetized particles are conveniently arranged, as they are now, the atmosphere will be protected. The Earth experiences a level-three geomagnetic storm about 200 times every 11 years, the length of the Sun's storm cycle. The current cycle is scheduled to reach its peak in 2013 so there will likely be more storms which could disrupt our terrestrial life.
Photo credit: shutterstock.com
Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.
- The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
- Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
- Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
Most people think human extinction would be bad. These people aren't philosophers.
- A new opinion piece in The New York Times argues that humanity is so horrible to other forms of life that our extinction wouldn't be all that bad, morally speaking.
- The author, Dr. Todd May, is a philosopher who is known for advising the writers of The Good Place.
- The idea of human extinction is a big one, with lots of disagreement on its moral value.
Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.
- Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
- In nature, properties of Particle B may depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
- In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.