Scientists Identify The Brain's "Honesty Switch"

Have you ever experienced a moment when you've teetered between telling the truth and telling a lie? According to a new study, you have your dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to thank for that.

Have you ever experienced a moment when you've teetered between telling the truth and telling a lie? Researchers at Virginia Tech's Department of Psychology, fascinated by the brain's methods for weighing consequences, decided to investigate.


From Science Daily

"'We asked whether there's a switch in the brain that controls the cost and benefit tradeoff between honesty and self-interest,' [Assistant Professor Pearl] Chiu said. 'The answer to this question will help shed light on the nature of honesty and human preferences.'

The researchers' study was published this week in the journal Nature Neuroscience. Their findings suggest that the "honesty switch" is likely located in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, located behind the forehead.

From the study's abstract:

"We found that lesions of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) decreased the effect of honesty concerns on behavior in economic games that pit honesty motives against self-interest, but did not affect decisions when honesty concerns were absent. These results point to a causal role for DLPFC in honest behavior."

You'll notice in the paragraph above the researchers don't say "this is what controls lies" but rather explain how subjects with damaged DLPFCs exhibit fewer honest inhibitions, mostly due to a reduced concern for their self image. This is because the chosen experiment sought not to assess whether the DLPFC is active when telling a lie (other studies had suspected so much), but whether the DLPFC controls the decision to act honestly or not. The researchers found that most people strive to tell the truth; those with damaged DLPFCs made less of an effort.

Take a look at the Science Daily article linked below to learn more about the study, as well as what it means for further research. This may be a major step toward understanding the nature of honesty. 

Read more at Science Daily

Read the study at Nature Neuroscience (behind paywall)

Photo credit: Bangkokhappiness / Shutterstock

For more from Nature Neuroscience, check out the Big Think Interview with Sandra Aamodt, the journal's former Editor-in-Chief.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Love in a time of migrants: on rethinking arranged marriages

Arranged marriages and Western romantic practices have more in common than we might think.

Culture & Religion

In his book In Praise of Love (2009), the French communist philosopher Alain Badiou attacks the notion of 'risk-free love', which he sees written in the commercial language of dating services that promise their customers 'love, without falling in love'.

Keep reading Show less

A world map of Virgin Mary apparitions

She met mere mortals with and without the Vatican's approval.

Strange Maps
  • For centuries, the Virgin Mary has appeared to the faithful, requesting devotion and promising comfort.
  • These maps show the geography of Marian apparitions – the handful approved by the Vatican, and many others.
  • Historically, Europe is where most apparitions have been reported, but the U.S. is pretty fertile ground too.
Keep reading Show less

Extreme opponents of GM foods know the least science, but think they know the most

New research on the public's opinion about genetically modified foods illustrates an alarming cognitive bias.

(Photo: ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images)
Mind & Brain
  • A recent study compared the public's scientific literacy with their attitudes on GM foods.
  • The results showed that "as the extremity of opposition increased, objective knowledge went down, but self-assessed knowledge went up."
  • The results also suggest that, in terms of policy efforts to boost scientific literacy, education about a given topic alone isn't going to be enough.
Keep reading Show less