How to Quit Binge-Watching Cold Turkey (And Better Your Life)
If you're binge-watching through the night, chances are you're not getting enough sleep. That means you're probably not nearly as productive or happy as you should be during the day. Take a crash course in story structure and self-control in order to quash your addiction.
The new "Golden Age" of television has begot a golden age of insomnia and daytime sluggishness. That's because, with the advent of Netflix, Hulu and other on-demand video services, binge-watching your favorite TV shows has never been easier. But if you're staying up until 2 or 3 A.M each night trying catch up on Game of Thrones or Mad Men, it probably means you're not getting enough sleep. And if you're not getting enough sleep, you're likely not as productive (or sentient) as you'd like to be during your waking hours.
This was the case for The Wall Street Journal's Michael Hsu, who wrote in a recent column about how his binge-watching addiction undermined "[his] ability to be a good father, husband and friend."
Nobody wants to be a lousy person during the daytime just because they can't control their behavior during the night. Hsu explains that the key to overcoming your binge-watching is to unlock the secrets of story structure. Doing so will help you determine when it's best to press the red "on/off" button the remote. But what does he mean by the "secrets" of story structure. Simply put, TV magic isn't magic; it's an illusion, or something akin to hypnosis. Most viewers become lost in the spectacle of television without ever identifying the patterns and pieces that make up a compelling script.
There's a reason why many writers for screen and stage consider their work less art and more craft -- it takes an artisanal expertise to create a compelling TV script, just as it takes a skilled craftsman or -woman to build strong furniture. Just as you can examine the design of a chair to understand how it supports so well, you can also break down the elements of a story. This, Hsu explains, is how you temper your impulses. Pull away the curtain and identify why and how your favorite shows keep you hooked. Then, simply unhook.
For example, any tv show with a season- or series-wide story arc features a repetitive story structure for each episode. Some are fairly obvious, like with multi-camera sitcoms such as The Big Bang Theory. Others like Mad Men or Breaking Bad are more subtle. Usually there are about three mini arcs within each episode -- an A, B, and C story. The A story involves the main character, the B and C's involve minor characters.
Hsu spoke with a TV writer who explained that, in most cases, the C and B stories are resolved first (you naturally want to save your biggest fireworks for the finale). Almost universally, there is a lull in action following a major plot point or story beat. This, Hsu says, is why you want to quit watching an episode as soon as the C/B stories are resolved -- usually about 30-35 minutes into a 45-minute show. This way, you won't become compelled by a cliffhanger to keep going. The next night, you just pick up where you left off and immediately get to the good stuff, as well as the events that will lead you into the next episode.
If all that sounds too complicating, another option is to disable the auto-play feature that immediately starts a countdown to the next episode. You can also make sure you're eating and drinking while watching, as "exercising self-restraint gets more difficult when our energy levels drop." These are minor strategies though -- your better bet is to tame the urge to get through entire episodes at a time.
Do you have any particular strategies for helping ward off the binge-watching bug? Share them below.
Read more at The Wall Street Journal
Photo credit: Dave Clark Digital Photo / Shutterstock
Dominique Crenn, the only female chef in America with three Michelin stars, joins Big Think Live this Thursday at 1pm ET.
Scientists discover the inner workings of an effect that will lead to a new generation of devices.
- Researchers discover a method of extracting previously unavailable information from superconductors.
- The study builds on a 19th-century discovery by physicist Edward Hall.
- The research promises to lead to a new generation of semiconductor materials and devices.
Credit: Gunawan/Nature magazine
The number of people with dementia is expected to triple by 2060.
The images and our best computer models don't agree.
A trio of intriguing galaxy clusters<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDQzNDA0OS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYxNTkzNzUyOH0.0IRzkzvKsmPEHV-v1dqM1JIPhgE2W-UHx0COuB0qQnA/img.jpg?width=980" id="d69be" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="2d2664d9174369e0a06540cb3a3a9079" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
The three galaxy clusters imaged for the study
Mapping dark matter<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="d904b585c806752f261e1215014691a6"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fO0jO_a9uLA?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span><p>The assumption has been that the greater the lensing effect, the higher the concentration of dark matter.</p><p>As scientists analyzed the clusters' large-scale lensing — the massive arc and elongation visual effects produced by dark matter — they noticed areas of smaller-scale lensing within that larger distortion. The scientists interpret these as concentrations of dark matter within individual galaxies inside the clusters.</p><p>The researchers used spectrographic data from the VLT to determine the mass of these smaller lenses. <a href="https://www.oas.inaf.it/en/user/pietro.bergamini/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pietro Bergamini</a> of the INAF-Observatory of Astrophysics and Space Science in Bologna, Italy explains, "The speed of the stars gave us an estimate of each individual galaxy's mass, including the amount of dark matter." The leader of the spectrographic aspect of the study was <a href="http://docente.unife.it/docenti-en/piero.rosati1/curriculum?set_language=en" target="_blank">Piero Rosati</a> of the Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Italy who recalls, "the data from Hubble and the VLT provided excellent synergy. We were able to associate the galaxies with each cluster and estimate their distances." </p><p>This work allowed the team to develop a thoroughly calibrated, high-resolution map of dark matter concentrations throughout the three clusters.</p>
But the models say...<p>However, when the researchers compared their map to the concentrations of dark matter computer models predicted for galaxies bearing the same general characteristics, something was <em>way</em> off. Some small-scale areas of the map had 10 times the amount of lensing — and presumably 10 times the amount of dark matter — than the model predicted.</p><p>"The results of these analyses further demonstrate how observations and numerical simulations go hand in hand," notes one team member, <a href="https://nena12276.wixsite.com/elenarasia" target="_blank">Elena Rasia</a> of the INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Trieste, Italy. Another, <a href="http://adlibitum.oats.inaf.it/borgani/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stefano Borgani</a> of the Università degli Studi di Trieste, Italy, adds that "with advanced cosmological simulations, we can match the quality of observations analyzed in our paper, permitting detailed comparisons like never before."</p><p>"We have done a lot of testing of the data in this study," Meneghetti says, "and we are sure that this mismatch indicates that some physical ingredient is missing either from the simulations or from our understanding of the nature of dark matter." <a href="https://physics.yale.edu/people/priyamvada-natarajan" target="_blank">Priyamvada Natarajan</a> of Yale University in Connecticut agrees: "There's a feature of the real Universe that we are simply not capturing in our current theoretical models."</p><p>Given that any theory in science lasts only until a better one comes along, Natarajan views the discrepancy as an opportunity, saying, "this could signal a gap in our current understanding of the nature of dark matter and its properties, as these exquisite data have permitted us to probe the detailed distribution of dark matter on the smallest scales."</p><p>At this point, it's unclear exactly what the conflict signifies. Do these smaller areas have unexpectedly high concentrations of dark matter? Or can dark matter, under certain currently unknown conditions, produce a tenfold increase in lensing beyond what we've been expecting, breaking the assumption that more lensing means more dark matter?</p><p>Obviously, the scientific community has barely begun to understand this mystery.</p>
Scientists have found evidence of hot springs near sites where ancient hominids settled, long before the control of fire.