How Four Clues Can Reveal Your Identity When You Shop
Given only their credit card numbers, a group from MIT was able to uncover the identities of 90 percent of 1.1 million people.
Natalie has been writing professionally for about 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker
The internet is perhaps one of the most freeing and invasive places you could ever visit. On one hand you can browse unlimited amounts of information, but while doing so your movements will be tracked by the government, corporations, and any third-party that may see fit to track your movements. But even with the Edward Snowden revelations, most consumers still shop with a credit card, type in personal information and submit it to a website, and use sites like Google to do their searches.
Yes, companies anonymize consumer data, but some may be surprised how many crumbs they drop along the way and how just four pieces of information are all it takes to link a person to a credit card number.
Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge and his team wanted to see how much effort it would take to match a person with their purchases. The group looked at three months' worth of credit card records from 1.1 million people from an unidentified location, scrubbed of personal information. The researchers were able to pick out 90 percent of the people through just four pieces of information, and one of the four clues had nothing to do with what had been purchased. New Scientist's Aviva Rutkin spoke to de Montjoye in an interview, explaining:
"We're building this body of evidence showing how hard it actually is to anonymize large sets of data like credit cards, mobile phones, and browsing information. We really need to think about what it means to be make data truly anonymous and whether it's even possible."
While retail sites do make an effort to anonymize consumer data, the metadata still exists, which is plenty—with enough datapoints—to connect that card with an identity. AOL ran into just this incident when it released search queries (all associated with randomized numbers) back in 2006. However, the internet was easily able to track down some of these “anonymous” users by looking at just a few searches.
Anyone wanting to start a journey to anonymize themselves can start with projects, such as the Tor browser and The Guardian Project. Also, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has built a secure messaging scorecard. Of course, it's difficult to completely anonymize data, even if the data itself is encrypted. Where it's going and where it's come from are still traceable. But the best place to start anonymizing that data is to start with the Tor browser and start purchasing things with cash. However, this amount of effort is beyond what most are willing to go through for the sake of avoiding data collection.
What efforts are you willing to go through to protect your personal data?
Read more at New Scientist.
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
There's a high social cost that comes with lighting up.
While short-term results are positive, there is mounting evidence against staying in ketosis for too long.
- Recent studies showed volunteers lost equal or more weight on high-carb, calorie-restricted diets than low-carb, calorie restricted diets.
- There might be positive benefits to short-term usage of a ketogenic diet.
- One dietician warns that the ketogenic diet could put diabetics at risk for diabetic ketoacidosis.
Research shows that the way math is taught in schools and how its conceptualized as a subject is severely impairing American student's ability to learn and understand the material.
- Americans continually score either in the mid- or bottom-tier when it comes to math and science compared to their international peers.
- Students have a fundamental misunderstanding of what math is and what it can do. By viewing it as a language, students and teachers can begin to conceptualize it in easier and more practical ways.
- A lot of mistakes come from worrying too much about rote memorization and speedy problem-solving and from students missing large gaps in a subject that is reliant on learning concepts sequentially.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.