How much privacy are we willing to give up?
I've been reading Everyware:
The dawning age of ubiquitous computingby Adam Greenfield. It's a
fascinating book and I'm learning a lot.
Greenfield's essential premise is that in the foreseeable future sensors and
transmitters can and will be embedded into everyday objects, ranging from the
clothes on our body to the milk in our refrigerator to the blanket on our bed to
the picture frame on our wall. This essentially makes the things we use everyday
into quasi-digital devices. The rapid evolution, miniaturization, and
affordability of RFID chips, and their incorporation into various aspects of
life, is one example of this trend. The inclusion of GPS technologies in cars,
cell phones, and watches is another. So is some of the work currently being done
dust, and the like. Once embedded, these sensors and transmitters will be
able to communicate with each other and with more complex digital technologies
like your home computer.
Why will sensors and transmitters be embedded into everyday things? Because,
as Greenfield notes, in the battle between convenience and privacy, most folks
are more than willing to give up some privacy for convenience. I saw this in
action quite clearly during my visit to the Microsoft
Home of the Futurein 2006. A few illustrative examples:
- Imagine that your kitchen counter can discern what you put on it (milk,
eggs, flour) and that a recipe appears on the counter surface informing you of
the various things that you can make with those ingredients.
has informed it that you're running low on pancake mix.
because the motion sensors in Grandma's apartment haven't registered any
movement for the past six hours even though it's mid-day.
sense the people who enterand adjust the art, lighting, temperature, etc.
to reflect individual preferences.
in your eyeglasses that could register the identity of the person walking toward
you and quickly say into your ear her name and how you know her.
These are just a few of the many, many possibilities. Think medicine bottles
and backpacks, toilets and toys, floors and doors, and...
Greenfield believes that the arrival of ambient
informaticsis inevitable. The power and potential will be too
great for most people to refuse and, in many cases, the capabilities will be in
place before folks even have a chance to think too hard about it and/or make
objections. However, Greenfield also notes that we need to start thinking and
talking about whatever social, ethical, and other concerns we may have right
now. After these informatics are embedded and installed, it often will be too
late because there are logic rules that are built into the construction of the
sensors and transmitters. For example, maybe you don't want your floor or front
door or toilet 'spying' on you but you do want your refrigerator to do so. You
need to think about that at the front end during the design and/or purchasing
stage, not after the fact.
There's a lot more I could say on this, but I'll close with a strong
recommendation that folks read Everyware.
It's a very different way to think about digital technologies and yet I agree
with Greenfield that it will be our future. We need to start talking about this
aspect of ubiquitous computing and we need to ask
ourselves, "How much privacy are we willing to give
- The meaning of the word 'confidence' seems obvious. But it's not the same as self-esteem.
- Confidence isn't just a feeling on your inside. It comes from taking action in the world.
- Join Big Think Edge today and learn how to achieve more confidence when and where it really matters.
- There are 2 different approaches to governing free speech on college campuses.
- One is a morality/order approach. The other is a bottom-up approach.
Famous physicists like Richard Feynman think 137 holds the answers to the Universe.
- The fine structure constant has mystified scientists since the 1800s.
- The number 1/137 might hold the clues to the Grand Unified Theory.
- Relativity, electromagnetism and quantum mechanics are unified by the number.
- Economist Sylvia Ann Hewlett breaks down what qualities will inspire others to believe in you.
- Here's how 300 leaders and 4,000 mid-level managers described someone with executive presence.
- Get more deep insights like these to power your career forward. Join Big Think Edge.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.