In the public interest … correcting the AFP
Sign up for Big Think on Substack
The most surprising and impactful new stories delivered to your inbox every week, for free.
In today’s Guantanamo files it appears that not only is al-Shihri still suspected of being involved in the September 2008 attack on the US Embassy (hopefully, returning readers know how I feel about the lack of evidence surrounding this charge, as I’m tired of typing it) but also that both al-Shihri and al-Awfi were repatriated to Saudi in July 2007.
They were actually sent back in November 2007. Maybe it was just a typo by the AFP, but really when reporting on a story in which there is already so much guess-work don’t reporters owe their readers the courtesy of being certain of the facts they report as facts? And this one isn’t even that hard to look up – just check the NY Times’ excellent (but not printer friendly) database.
Sign up for Big Think on Substack
The most surprising and impactful new stories delivered to your inbox every week, for free.