Chris Hayes Will Not Sub for Keith Olbermann After All (Correction)
Nation editor Chris Hayes will not be subbing for Keith Olbermann after all. I posted earlier that he was disinvited but, that was incorrect. Hayes tweeted: "OK: I'm not filling in on Countdown tonight because I didn't feel comfortable doing it given the circumstances."
MSNBC announced that Hayes would be filling in for Olbermann, then a few hours later it announced that he wouldn't be subbing after all. Somewhere in the interim, the Village Voice Runnin' Scared blog reported that Hayes had also given to campaigns. The Voice still maintains that Hayes was suspended.
Olbermann ostensibly got suspended because NBC News bars its employees from political giving. Hayes is a frequent guest on MSNBC and he has subbed for Rachel Maddow, but it's unlikely that he's a network employee. If not, his previous political giving is irrelevant. Looks like we have our answer: Hayes also tweeted, "My not hosting tonight has *nothing* to do with several donations I made to two friends *before* I ever signed an MSNBC contract".
It appears that MSNBC's rules are enforced selectively. Conservative MSNBC host Joe Scarborough donates with impunity, ostensibly because he's a commentator rather than a journalist.
An unnamed source told Gawker that MSNBC doesn't hold its hosts to NBC News rules anyway:
"The standards department has told us that MSNBC doesn't answer to NBC News standards," the insider said. "They don't have coverage over MSNBC. They used to, back before MSNBC went political, but at some point it became too hard and MSNBC was taken out of their portfolio. As far as I know, there are no ethical standards at MSNBC. And if NBC says MSNBC is supposed to be living up to the NBC News standards, that's a preposterous lie." [Gawker]
It's an anonymous source talking to Gawker, so take it with a grain of salt. But it's hard to imagine how MSNBC could have been holding Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow to NBC News standards of impartiality all this time. Like Hayes, Olbermann and Maddow are proud opinion journalists.
[Photo credit: Lindsay Beyerstein]
Upvote the video, or videos, you want to win.
As you vote, keep in mind that we are looking for a winner with the most engaging social venture pitch - an idea you would want to invest in. And note: We'll only count upvotes (not downvotes).
- Oumuamua, a quarter-mile long asteroid tumbling through space, is Hawaiian for "scout", or "the first of many".
- It was given this name because it came from another solar system.
- Some claimed Oumuamua was an alien technology, but there's no actual evidence for that.
An innovation may lead to lifelike evolving machines.
- Scientists at Cornell University devise a material with 3 key traits of life.
- The goal for the researchers is not to create life but lifelike machines.
- The researchers were able to program metabolism into the material's DNA.
Here are 7 often-overlooked World Heritage Sites, each with its own history.
- UNESCO World Heritage Sites are locations of high value to humanity, either for their cultural, historical, or natural significance.
- Some are even designated as World Heritage Sites because humans don't go there at all, while others have felt the effects of too much human influence.
- These 7 UNESCO World Heritage Sites each represent an overlooked or at-risk facet of humanity's collective cultural heritage.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.