Yellowstone addendum: When credibility counts

Yellowstone addendum: When credibility counts

I wrote earlier this week about the media and its treatment of Yellowstone caldera. Well, I tried to be calm about a post/video I saw earlier today on CNN's American Morning blog by Rebecca Hillman, but I don't think I can. Kiran Chetry decided to interview Michio Kaku, a noted physicist, about the caldera - specifically about the recent findings about the inflation. What happens next is one of the worst interviews about Yellowstone I've ever seen - and shows us what happens when you are lazy and don't get a real expert in the field. Heck, it didn't even need to be a volcanologist, but I'm sure that they could have found even a geologist for the interview.


Some things that Kaku says in the interview include:

  • Yellowstone is "due" to erupt - pointing towards the repose time as the only evidence.
  • Any eruption of Yellowstone will "destroy the U.S."
  • An eruption of Yellowstone can be dealt with by "running"
  • The last eruption was 600 million years ago (not 640,000) ... and had to be corrected by Chetry.
  • That an eruption like Yellowstone is somehow associated with the K-T extinction of the dinosaurs. A "double whammy?"
  • "We're nervous" about Yellowstone?
  • Sea level changes because of Yellowstone?
  • At least Kaku gets the idea of the 100 km devastation zone, but then he calls for "poisonous gases" to kill animals out to 1000 km.
  • "We don't want to panic everybody", but then goes on to say that predicting when it could erupt is "black magic". Yes, Kaku more or less called volcano monitoring "black magic".
  • You don't get much warning before an eruption of Yellowstone?
  • "We're still clueless" about volcano monitoring and "no understanding of the scope" and it could happen "tomorrow". 
  • Now, maybe I'm being very picky here, but this just smacks at geology and volcanology, not only hurting the disciplines' credibility by having an "expert" on Yellowstone (as they claim Kaku is) tell people that volcano monitoring is "black magic" but also it hurts Kaku's credibility because he is so wrong about so many things. This is where the media really needs to be called out for not taking the time to properly vet and research a topic that many people worry about - that is a potential eruption of Yellowstone. It might not be likely, but we definitely don't need people coming about and spreading inaccurate information about the very sophisticated monitoring going on at the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory. I know many people like Michio and his work towards popularizing science, something that I fully support, but CNN and Kaku should be ashamed of this performance.

    Top left: A geyser at Norris Basin in Yellowstone behaving like me after seeing this interview.

    Why the number 137 is one of the greatest mysteries in physics

    Famous physicists like Richard Feynman think 137 holds the answers to the Universe.

    Pixabay
    Surprising Science
    • The fine structure constant has mystified scientists since the 1800s.
    • The number 1/137 might hold the clues to the Grand Unified Theory.
    • Relativity, electromagnetism and quantum mechanics are unified by the number.
    Keep reading Show less

    Americans under 40 want major reforms, expanded Supreme Court

    Younger Americans support expanding the Supreme Court and serious political reforms, says new poll.

    Demonstrators In Louisville calling for justice for Breonna Taylor.

    Credit: Jon Cherry/Getty Images
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • Americans under 40 largely favor major political reforms, finds a new survey.
    • The poll revealed that most would want to expand the Supreme Court, impose terms limits, and make it easier to vote.
    • Millennials are more liberal and reform-centered than Generation Z.
    Keep reading Show less

    Can fake news help you remember real facts better?

    A 2020 study published in the journal of Psychological Science explores the idea that fake news can actually help you remember real facts better.

    Credit: Rawpixel.com on Shutterstock
    Mind & Brain
    • In 2019, researchers at Stanford Engineering analyzed the spread of fake news as if it were a strain of Ebola. They adapted a model for understanding diseases that can infect a person more than once to better understand how fake news spreads and gains traction.
    • A new study published in 2020 explores the idea that fake news can actually help you remember real facts better.
    • "These findings demonstrate one situation in which misinformation reminders can diminish the negative effects of fake-news exposure in the short term," researchers on the project explained.
    Keep reading Show less
    Scroll down to load more…
    Quantcast