What is the trend in innovation?

Many would claim that "innovation" remains the hottest buzzword in business today. Yet, according to this graphical chart from Google Trends (which measures the popularity of certain search requests), it looks like the term "innovation" was actually hotter in 2005 than it was in 2006. Am I reading this chart correctly? Notice, too, that during the summer months (flat) and the winter holidays (sharp spike down), people tend to take a break from innovation.

I think there might be three possible explanations for the traffic patterns between 2005 and 2007:

(1) As the term "innovation" has matured, Google users have become more precise in their searches. They now use specific terms like "fuzzy front end" to describe the exact part of the innovation process they are interested in, rather than broad, generic terms like "innovation"

(2) Google users view "innovation" as a broad umbrella term that encompasses other areas like design, creativity, and invention. Thus, the fact that users are not searching for "innovation" does not mean that they are not searching for these sub-disciplines and related areas. Or, maybe they are searching for things like "Web 2.0," which is innovative in and of itself without the need for a descriptive word related to "innovation"

(3) In the past 12 months, there has not been any breathtaking new theory or model within the innovation world that has captured the hearts and minds of Internet users around the world. (I'm thinking specifically of something like "disruptive innovation" or "creative destruction")

Anyway, it's also interesting to note from where the largest search volume for "innovation" is originating. It's not the USA. Instead, the five leading cities or regions for innovation-related searches are Copenhagen, Singapore, Ottawa, Berlin and Bangalore. Rounding out the Top 10 are Dusseldorf, Sydney, Cologne, London and Dublin. Thus, innovation is hardly a North American  or even English-speaking phenomenon.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, the people lose.

Top Video Splash
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.