Within Scotland, economic development leaders are debating what to do about the country's "chronically low level of innovation" -- a situation made all the more distressing by the ability of their rivals, the Irish, to become global innovation leaders. (According to research firm Forrester, Ireland is now an "innovation hub" and one of the most innovative countries in Europe.) In an op-ed piece for the Sunday Herald (U.K.), Robert Crawford, the executive director of business development and commercialization at Glasgow Caledonian University, argues that Scotland needs a national innovation agency to become a global innovation leader.
This agency would be able to leverage the knowledge capital within Scotland's universities, encourage the collaboration of academia and business, and bridge the space between the public and private sectors. Instead of turning to the Irish for ideas about innovation, Crawford suggests that Finland represents the best role model for Scotland:
"Finland may point the way to a possible solution to what we need. Its public bodies, such as Sitra and Tekes, have been operating in the space between public and private sectors for decades, acting as honest brokers to bring together universities, businesses and investors. Their raison d'etre is "innovation" and both are influential in the formulation of technology policy. Apparently, Scottish enterprise minister Nicol Stephen visited Finland recently and came back enthused about creating a Scottish model..."
In many ways, this is an issue of national pride. The Scots are obviously a bit irked that the Irish are taking the lead when it comes to innovation and then bragging about it. The Irish have been touting their status as innovation leaders by running special promotional sections in international business magazines and newspapers, including the Wall Street Journal. According to Crawford, though, the Scots are no less talented than the Irish:
"Now, while not wishing to denigrate or devalue what Ireland has achieved in upgrading its R&D infrastructure nor its innovation level, I can't help thinking that a 12.5% corporation tax rate has something to do with the inflows of international R&D projects the article proudly proclaims. In fact, I am prepared to make a small wager that the intellectual capital within Scotland's higher education institutions is substantially better than in equivalent disciplines and departments in Ireland.
Scotland really does have world-class research, which is one of the reasons why the US pharmaceutical company, Wyeth, through the good offices of Scottish Development International decided to form a research relationship with four Scottish universities and NHS Scotland. The sad thing is that we don't have more of these deals involving not only multinationals, but more especially Scottish companies."
[image: Scotland vs. Ireland in rugby]