Who is a Chinese?

This topic deserves more attention. Below you will find an [abridged] transcript of a fascinating talk given on Chinese identity by Frank Ching, an American writer and journalist. It touches upon some very sensitive issues such as China’s expansionism, revisionism, and race theory. The talk took place at Peking University on July 24, 2013. 


Who is a Chinese?

I think that many ethnic Chinese – and by that I mean Han Chinese – born and brought up outside China, often grow up feeling rootless and wanting to know more about China and about their own family background. […]

When did the first Chinese appear on the scene? We can determine quite exactly when the first American appeared in the world: 1776, when the United States of America was born. But when was China born? A lot of people talk about 5,000 years of Chinese civilization, but when did the people become Chinese? When did China become China?

The word “China” supposedly came from the First Emperor, who unified the country and established the Ch’in Dynasty. Is that when Chinese first emerged on the world scene, in 221 B.C.? Was Qin Shi-huan the first Chinese? Where did the first Chinese come from? […]

Certainly, when I was going to school, the concept of Chinese was equated with the concept of the Han people. I don’t know if schools in China still teach about the great patriot Yue Fei and the traitor Qin Kuai, who brought about his execution in the southern Song dynasty. Clearly, both Yue Fei and Qin Kuai were Chinese, one a patriot and the other a traitor.

Forgive me while I spend a few minutes on Chinese history, which I’m sure you all know better than I do. The southern Song dynasty was succeeded by the Yuan dynasty, established by Kublai Kahn, the first Mongol emperor. This is where the concept of Chineseness gets a little tricky:

Kublai Khan overthrew the southern Song dynasty and established a Mongol dynasty, known to Chinese history as the Yuan dynasty. This was the first foreign dynasty to rule all of China, and it lasted until 1368. But were the Mongols foreigners in China?

Since Kublai Khan was the emperor of China, by definition he must have been Chinese. Unless, of course, Kublai Khan was the emperor of China in the same sense that Queen Victoria was Empress of India. India became a colony of Britain and the people of India became British subjects for the next century and a half, until 1947. The British monarch did not become Chinese.

But with Kublai Khan, it seems, the situation was different. Instead of the Chinese becoming turned into Mongol subject, it appears, the Mongol conquerors were transformed into Chinese nationals. That certainly is the view of the Chinese government today.

Who is a non-Han Chinese?

I became aware of the current political view of history when I went to a talk at the Chinese University of Hong Kong given by a renowned scholar, who claimed that China was never conquered.

The Mongols did not conquer China, he said. The Manchus did not conquer China. Those were not wars of conquest but civil wars. The Mongols and Manchus were Chinese, though perhaps they didn’t know it.

So in China today, the accepted wisdom is that not only did the Mongols and Manchus not conquer China, but the lands that they conquered became part of China and, indeed, are part of China today.

Of course, the difference in behavior between Queen Victoria and the Mongol and Manchu rulers was that Queen Victoria did not move her capital from London to Peking. Both the Mongols and the Manchus established their capital in Beijing. Thus, Chinese people point to area conquered by them as Chinese territory, or having been Chinese territory at one time.

I often say that if Japan, after conquering much of China in the 1930s and 1940s, had moved its capital from Tokyo to Beijing, many Chinese people today would say that in the 1940s, Japan used to be part of China and, in fact, all the territories conquered by Japan, including virtually all of Southeast Asia, were part of China. […]

If China wanted to remain only Han, it would lose almost half of its territory. So, for very pragmatic reasons, the republican leadership decided that Chinese were not just Han, but included other races as well.

So the Republic of China, and subsequently the People’s Republic of China, decided that in order to keep all the territories within the boundaries of the Qing empire, they had to recognize non-Han people as Chinese people.

But re-interpreting history also creates problems.

How did China get so big?

If China wanted to remain only Han, it would lose almost half of its territory. So, for very pragmatic reasons, the republican leadership decided that Chinese were not just Han, but included other races as well.

When did these non-Han people become Chinese, or were they Chinese all along? For example, if Kublai Khan was Chinese, then was his grandfather, Genghis Khan, also Chinese? Genghis Khan founded the biggest empire in history, including part of China and a substantial part of Central Asia. In fact, the Mongol empire occupied most of Eurasia. Should China now claim all those areas as Chinese? […]

At a time when China’s rise is causing concern in neighboring countries, Chinese academics and officials say reassuringly that China has never been expansionist. But then, if so, why are China’s borders today so different from those of the First Emperor? How did China get to be so big?

One explanation is to say that the Han were not expansionist, but the Mongols and Manchus were expansionist. But then, if the Mongols and Manchus were also Chinese, the argument that China was not expansionist can no longer hold water. If Mongols and Manchus were Chinese all along, then China has been an aggressive, expansionist power through much of its history. […]

Who is an Overseas Chinese?

Let me say a few words on China’s attitude towards so-called “overseas Chinese.” Actually, according to a Chinese political dictionary, an overseas Chinese is a Chinese national who lives overseas. But, it seems, the common attitude is that it includes all people of Chinese descent around the world. […]

Other countries, it seems, don’t hold onto the descendants of people who emigrated overseas and claim them as their own. For example, Britain, to whom many Americans trace their ancestry, doesn’t claim George Bush and his family as “overseas British.” They are simply recognized as American.

But China, it seems, insists that anyone with Chinese blood cannot be a foreigner, but is really a Chinese with foreign citizenship.

Image credit: Mrmichaelangelo/Shutterstock.com

Trusting your instincts is lazy: Poker pro Liv Boeree on Big Think Edge

International poker champion Liv Boeree teaches decision-making for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to make decisions with the clarity of a World Series Poker Champion.
  • Liv Boeree teaches analytical thinking for Big Think Edge.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less

Your romantic partner is probably less intelligent than you think, suggests new study

Our egotism and self-confidence can sometimes spill-over to our loved ones.

Mind & Brain

It's now well known that many of us over-estimate our own brainpower. In one study, more than 90 per cent of US college professors famously claimed to be better than average at teaching, for instance – which would be highly unlikely. Our egos blind us to our own flaws.

Keep reading Show less

Here's when machines will take your job, as predicted by A.I. gurus

An MIT study predicts when artificial intelligence will take over for humans in different occupations.

Photo credit: YOSHIKAZU TSUNO / AFP / Getty Images
Surprising Science

While technology develops at exponential speed, transforming how we go about our everyday tasks and extending our lives, it also offers much to worry about. In particular, many top minds think that automation will cost humans their employment, with up to 47% of all jobs gone in the next 25 years. And chances are, this number could be even higher and the massive job loss will come earlier.

Keep reading Show less

Are you an overbuyer or an underbuyer?

One way to limit clutter is by being mindful of your spending.

Videos
  • Overbuyers are people who love to buy — they stockpile things as a result. These are individuals who are prone to run out of space in trying to store their stuff and they may even lose track of what — and how much of what — they have.
  • One way overbuyers can limit their waste, both money and space wise, is by storing items at the store, and then buy them when they really need them.
  • Underbuyers tend to go to extraordinary lengths to not buy things. They save money and do fewer errands, however, they often make do with shabby personal items. They may also, when they finally decide to go out to buy a product, go without entirely because the item may no longer be available.