DABA: Andrew Watt
[I’m reviving my Blogs That Deserve a Bigger Audience (DABA) feature. If there is a blog that you think should be featured here, drop me a note.]
Today the Crimson Megaphone goes to Andrew Watt. Andrew is a history teacher at a small private boarding school in northeast Connecticut. He also is a level 1 USFA-certified foil coach, a NOLS-trained outdoor educator, and Chair of the Commission on Professional Development for the Connecticut Association of Independent Schools. I've been reading Andrew for a long time. His blog definitely deserves a bigger audience.
Here are excerpts from 5 of Andrew’s posts to get you started…
It is then that I realize that the girl is not having difficulty climbing because she’s tired, or slightly on the large side. She is having difficulty because she is acrophobic, and she is now two thousand feet above the surrounding countryside.
It doesn’t matter that there is a solid mountain of New Hampshire shist and quartz underfoot. It doesn’t matter that there is a crowd of people around us at all times. She is small, and afraid, and on top of a mountain.
Oh, and we are alone
I taught an acrophobe how to climb a mountain today, and how to come down again. One step at a time. In some ways it’s a wonder that either of us is still alive. In other ways, it’s how we always teach - one step at a time up the mountain, and one step at a time down.
Sometimes the students take the lessons to heart quickly, and sometimes they absorb them slowly. Sometimes they run on ahead and leave us behind so rapidly that we’re still catching our breath. And sometimes? Sometimes you’ve got to be the crutch, all the way up.
And all the way down.
as my friend pointed out, those things that I’ll accept and those that I won’t allow make me a vested interest. I’ll fight tooth, nail, and claw to keep certain rights, push back against others, and expect radical change - as long as it does not really inconvenience me, wreck my tenure, or my pension, or damage my seniority.
That makes me a vested interest.
There is a strong desire to re-make American education from the top down, and the laws and grand grant programs of the last decade seem uniquely suited to carrying out that vision. The “little people” who stand in the way of that vision are going to be rudely pushed aside for a little while as those forces push for the logical conclusions of the programs.
But the other side of the coin is the real problem. We aren’t about to get some new educational plan out of all of this. There isn’t going to be some new tech-based teaching style and there isn’t going to be a massive shift to a new, progressive creativity-based approach in the classroom, with a lot of innovation in the classroom, and a lot of effort to institute change.
Because a lot of teachers just got scared for their jobs. A lot of teachers just got put on notice that they can’t negotiate, and they can’t argue, and they can’t dawdle or delay or fight back, even though they can’t afford to toe the line.
It’s not enough to teach kids how to use the web. We also have to teach them how to use books, as well. We have to teach students how navigate between multiple sources of information - some digital, some paper; some secondary, some primary, some tertiary; some books, some magazines, some weblogs. We have to teach them to express themselves in multiple modalities: giving up authorship control on wikis, claiming opinions for themselves on blogs, arguing formally in papers, chatting informally in podcasts, reporting impartially in newspapers, creating beauty in graphical displays; and standing up to present what they know in a way that showcases confidence, intelligence and poise.
And that means that I have to think of each student as enmeshed in a Three-Fold Web.
one of the points that he makes is that it’s not enough to teach kids to think critically. And it’s not. I’ve been trying to get my kids to think critically for years, but that means observing the process of my own critical thinking - which is harder than licking your own neck.
I also asked Andrew to participate in 5 Questions…
1. Besides your own blog and Dangerously Irrelevant, what are 3 blogs that you'd recommend to a school administrator that's new to the education blogosphere?
I think the big thing that I see is that the teaching profession is starting to be "in-flux" in the same way that the recording industry started being in flux ten years ago, and the newspaper business started to be in flux three years ago. I meet teachers all the time now - both at my school and at conferences and in transit between other things - who are losing their jobs, or having to shift schools because their old school is undergoing re-assignment (magnet school to STEM school, STEM to magnet, public to charter etc). I don't think schools are going to look like they do now in as little as five years, and the stuff that I see coming out of Clay Shirky, Dangerously Irrelevant, Seth Godin, Weblogg-ed, Moving at the Speed of Creativity, TeachPaperless, and The Tempered Radical suggest that teachers need to start thinking of ourselves as entities that may be teaching in five years, but disaggregated - that means fired - from traditional school environments.
3. What does '21st century teaching / learning / schooling' mean to you?
Increasingly, I think there's a divide between those three things — teaching, learning and schooling. Teaching is what I do in the classroom, which is to try to impart an information-set to a group of students. Learning is what I and my students do together, in a digital environment. And schooling is all the rest of conveying social norms — don't fight in school, don't grab a girl's private bits, this is how you play lacrosse, this is how you set a classroom or conference room in order at the end of the school day, and so on. I do a lot more schooling than I'd really like. I do think that the students who come to me are arriving less-prepared every year. I used to be able to assume some knowledge of ancient Greek myths in my classes, and an understanding of writing basics, and some literary exposure. It's proving less true, and I do think that 21st century learning has to cater to an audience more influenced by movies and games and television than books and newspapers.
4. What is a special learning experience you had when you were in elementary or secondary school? What made it special and memorable?
My mother recalls that when I was in second grade, she was called to a special meeting. A teacher had given a quiz on the federal government, and many students had done very poorly. There was outrage and anger, because the teacher had given the quiz without providing any information ahead of time. The meeting was an opportunity for the teacher to explain that it was a pre-test, to find out what students already knew. A woman sitting next to my mother leaned over and said, "only one little boy knew all the answers. Your son. Why is that?" And my mother, startled and slightly unnerved, said that her uncle worked in Washington DC, and had hosted me for a long weekend as a visitor and guest, and had taken me to the Smithsonian and the White House and the Capitol. I remember the trip, and the places, but not the quiz, of course. On another occasion, when I was in fifth grade, I was recommended to a special science program, and I and another boy from my class got to spend a weekend at a mountain-top astronomical observatory run by the state department of education. We stayed up all night to watch the stars, learn the constellations and see the planets, and observe the moon through a telescope. In a dark basement room, we got to watch one of the first lasers available to students shine its red light through a cloud of chalk dust. A lot of my best educational memories are along those lines - unusual places and events in locations far distant from home, where experts taught me something new that I might need for the life that was ahead.
5. What impacts do you think ubiquitous wireless broadband Internet access would have on us?
I think that I'm already carrying the Library of Alexandria around in my pocket thanks to an iPhone and an iPad. Even without internet access on it, I carry around about 600 books in Stanza, Kindle software, and iBooks. If I had an SD chip reader that worked with either device, I'd carry around 5000 or so, just to demonstrate the power of this kind of device: an entire school library in the space-equivalent of a 3-ring binder! This kind of always-on firehose of information is seductive to students. I spend far more time policing Appropriate Use issues than I'd like, even in a class where they're discussed regularly and openly. Yesterday a kid was watching a replay of a baseball game, two others were playing a game, and two more were "wandering vaguely", to use A.A. Milne's prescient description of web-surfing. This is a class of seven kids! I think lecture-based learning is dead, unless we start including meditation and focus and willpower exercises in grades as low as 1.
Thanks, Andrew, for all that you do!
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.
The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.
- When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
- When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
- Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.