from the world's big
Instagram wants to hide how many “likes” posts earn. Here’s why.
A new experiment aims to remove the psychological pressures of using Instagram.
- Head of Instagram Adam Mosseri recently outlined an experiment designed to see how users like using Instagram without the ability to see how many "likes" posts receive.
- Research shows that such metrics can lead to social comparison, which can affect self-esteem, depression and anxiety.
- What's unclear is how Instagram might change its platform if it finds out users overwhelmingly prefer invisible "likes", but also that the change hurts profits.
If you're using Instagram in Canada and notice that you can no longer see any "likes" on posts, it's because you're part of an experiment that the Facebook-owned company is rolling out this week. The goal is to see how users feel about using the platform when the pressures of racking up likes are removed.
"We want people to worry a little bit less about how many likes they're getting on Instagram and spend a bit more time connecting with the people that they care about," Instagram's head, Adam Mosseri, said Tuesday during Facebook's annual F8 conference.
Social comparison on platforms like Instagram and Facebook can be stressful, especially for younger users. Of course, users can become distressed from constantly comparing their lives or physical attractiveness to others on the image-based platform. But they suffer a more empirical blow when they post content that gets relatively few likes.
In the new experiment, users would still be able to see how many likes their posts earned, but others wouldn't.
"For teenagers, this is great because it would no longer highlight levels of popularity of themselves against other kids," Randi Priluck, a professor and associate dean at Pace University focused on social media and mobile marketing, told CNN. "But they're still going to see their own likes. People are very driven by rewards so they're still going to be competing for those likes. It's not going to fully solve the problem."
A 2017 study showed that Instagram had the most negative psychological impact on users than any other social media platform, affecting young girls in particular. By hiding the number of "likes" posts receive, Instagram users might feel less pressure to post content that their peers publicly support. Still, it wouldn't address other social-comparison problems that emerge from using the platform (and those like it), including social exclusion, bullying, fear of missing out, and feeling physically inadequate as a result of the ubiquity of selfie filters.
Also to consider is economics. Instagram influencers earn big money by posting sponsored content, and they're often compensated according to how many "likes" posts receive. Removing the visibility of received "likes" could change the frequency and manner with which they engage content.
"It will certainly create some near-term inefficiencies in how some of these deals get done," Kamiu Lee, CEO of influencer marketing platform Activate, told CNN. "In the long term, the industry will figure it out. It will just shift attention to some of these other things."
So, what will Instagram do if it finds that users prefer having invisible "likes", but also that this change hurts its bottom line? As major social media companies grapple with growing body of not-quite-new research showing the damaging psychological effects of their platforms, it remains unclear how much they're willing to pay to make their services a bit healthier to use.
Join us at 2 pm ET tomorrow!
Construction of the $500 billion dollar tech city-state of the future is moving ahead.
- The futuristic megacity Neom is being built in Saudi Arabia.
- The city will be fully automated, leading in health, education and quality of life.
- It will feature an artificial moon, cloud seeding, robotic gladiators and flying taxis.
The Red Sea area where Neom will be built:
Saudi Arabia Plans Futuristic City, "Neom" (Full Promotional Video)<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="c646d528d230c1bf66c75422bc4ccf6f"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/N53DzL3_BHA?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Are we genetically inclined for superstition or just fearful of the truth?
- From secret societies to faked moon landings, one thing that humanity seems to have an endless supply of is conspiracy theories. In this compilation, physicist Michio Kaku, science communicator Bill Nye, psychologist Sarah Rose Cavanagh, skeptic Michael Shermer, and actor and playwright John Cameron Mitchell consider the nature of truth and why some groups believe the things they do.
- "I think there's a gene for superstition, a gene for hearsay, a gene for magic, a gene for magical thinking," argues Kaku. The theoretical physicist says that science goes against "natural thinking," and that the superstition gene persists because, one out of ten times, it actually worked and saved us.
- Other theories shared include the idea of cognitive dissonance, the dangerous power of fear to inhibit critical thinking, and Hollywood's romanticization of conspiracies. Because conspiracy theories are so diverse and multifaceted, combating them has not been an easy task for science.
Coronavirus layoffs are a glimpse into our automated future. We need to build better education opportunities now so Americans can find work in the economy of tomorrow.
- Outplacement is an underperforming $5 billion dollar industry. A new non-profit coalition by SkillUp intends to disrupt it.
- More and more Americans will be laid off in years to come due to automation. Those people need to reorient their career paths and reskill in a way that protects their long-term livelihood.
- SkillUp brings together technology and service providers, education and training providers, hiring employers, worker outreach, and philanthropies to help people land in-demand jobs in high-growth industries.
Source: McKinsey Global Institute analysis [PDF]<p>Work in understanding the skills at the heart of the new digital economy is leading to novel assessments that allow individuals to prove mastery to faithfully represent their abilities—but also to give weight and stackability to the emerging ecosystem of micro-credentials that make education more seamless across time and education providers. And we are seeing the beginnings of a renewal in the liberal arts, focused on building human skills in affordable ways that are accessible to many more individuals and far more effective.</p><p>Amidst these dark times, there is much opportunity to refresh the nation's education and training solutions to support the success of individuals and society writ large.</p>