Skip to content
Only The Chinese Have Two Eyes

Only The Chinese Have Two Eyes

The Cyclops Polyphemus as a Metaphor for Western Civilization and its Linear Way of Reasoning


“The Greeks only understand theories, but the Chinese are the people who own the technologies.” Josafa Barbaro, 1474

“Only the Chinese have two eyes, all other mortals are blind.”Christian Wolff, 1721

“The Chinese eyes, after closing for a while, are now about to open up.”Ji Xianlin, 2006

According to the universal historians Arnold J. Toynbee, Samuel P. Huntington, and Ji Xianlin, the world’s states form 21, 23 or 25 spheres, nine civilizations, and fall into four cultural systems: Arabic/Islam, Confucian, Hindi/Brahmin, and Western/Christian, with the former three forming the Oriental cultural system and the latter one the Occidental cultural system. The main difference between the Orient and the Occident, so people say, lies in their different mode of thinking: The East is more inductive, the West is more deductive.

By means of continuously inducing the universal, Confucianism, Taoism, Shinto, Hinduism and Buddhism — as a rough guide – all ultimately arrive at the universal concept of “the One’, “Oneness of heaven and men’ (tian ren he yi), the “divine law’ behind theVedas, the “merger of Brahman and atma’ (Brahmatmaikyam) or “ultimate reality’ (Ayam atma bhrama), the underlying inductive principle being that:

All observed things are connected, therefore all things are one.

In inductive reasoning, one induces the universal “all things are one” from the particular “all things” that are “observed”. The conclusion may be sound, but cannot be certain.

The West, on the other hand, separates God and the world. After all, we are not Him, but created by Him: “Then God said, Let us make man in our image; in the image of God he created him”. (Old Testament, Gen 1;31).

Smarter faster: the Big Think newsletter
Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday

Accordingly, in Western classrooms we teach an analytic “concrete reality’ based on conditioned textual analysis and interpretation of the world, rather than a holistic “absolute reality’. Some examples of major works of analytical reasoning areEuclid’s Elements(c. 300 BC), Kant’s Copernican revolution (1787), Darwin’sTheory of Evolution(1859), Einstein’s Logic of continuity (1905), or Smith’sThe Wealth of the Nations(1776), the underlying deductive principle – as old as the Greeks themselves – being that:

All observed men are unique, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is unique.

In deductive reasoning, one deduces the particular “Socrates is unique” from universal “all men are unique”, relying on the premises “Socrates is a man” and “All men are unique”. The conclusion is sound and valid.

A world thus described by deductive reasoning reaches new conclusions from previously known factsad infinitum. A world by inductive reasoning on the other hand allocates relations to recurring phenomenal patterns. We may call the former a “string of cause and effect”, whereas in the latter we see a puzzle made of its parts.

Accordingly, in the same way as some cultures hold belief in one, many, or no gods at all, they also have different ways of perceiving the world and reasoning about it: Western civilization becameanalysis-basedwhile the Orient becameintegration-based.

Ancient stereotypes die hard. In La Route de la Soie, Aly Mazahéri quoted this ancient Persian and Arab saying from the Sassanian Dynasty (226-c. 640 AD):

“The Greeks never invented anything except some theories. They never taught any art. But the Chinese were different. They did teach all their arts, but indeed had no scientific theories whatever.” (Aly Mazahéri, 1983; Ji, 1996)

I will not go so far as Mazahéri to say ” they ” do only this and ” we ” do only that, nor will I claim that someone is definitely deductive in outlook just because he was born in London. It is not that easy. The making of every civilization’s treasures and contributions towards history is determined by its methodology for explaining the world’s phenomena according to its own experience and mode of rational interpretation: The East became “more” inductive while the West become “more” deductive — this appears to be born out by all the evidence.

Image credit: ccsx/Flickr.com

To keep up to date with this blog you can follow me on Twitter, RSS, my Website, or my other Blog.


Related

Up Next

It’s time for teachers to wake up to neuromyths

Over recent years a new industry has exploded that sells educational interventions purportedly based on neuroscience to schools. In 2006 a paper published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience reported that teachers […]