Are principals "public figures?"
Defamation can be either
written (libel) or spoken (slander) and is generally defined as false statements
of fact that harm another's reputation. The United States Supreme Court ruled in
1964 that public officials must prove "actual malice" in order to win a
defamation lawsuit(New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254).
Actual malice is defined as publication despite knowledge that the
statement was false or with reckless disregard for whether it was false. Truth
always is a defense against a defamation lawsuit unless there is malicious
intent. Also, written or spoken communication that is readily understood to be a
satire, parody, or humorously intended situation generally is not found to be
defamatory because the audience understands that the writing/speech is not
intended to be a statement of fact.
The New York Times principle was later extended to "public figures"
(see Curtis Pub. Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (1967). A public
figureis someone who commands "a substantial amount of public
interest by his position alone or has thrust himself by purposeful activity into
the vortex of an important public controversy" (19 A.L.R.5th 1).
school administrators considered to be public figures for purposes of a
defamation lawsuit? Well, as is usually the case with the law, it
Courts have ruled that principals ARE public figures in
- New York (Jee v. New York Post Co., Inc., 671 N.Y.S.2d 920 (1998));
F.Supp. 1439 (1993)).
Courts have ruled that principals ARE NOT public figures
- Georgia (Ellerbee v. Mills, 262 Ga. 516 (1992));
Superintendents and assistant superintendents generally have been found by
courts to be public figures (see, e.g., Di Bernardo v. Tonawanda Pub.
Corp., 499 N.Y.S.2d 553 (1986)); Kefgen v. Davidson, 617 N.W.2d
351 (2000); and Beck v. Lone Star Broadcasting, Co., 970 S.W.2d 610
So will the
former principal of Hickory High School in Hermitage, Pennsylvaniawin his
lawsuit against the four students who created parody
MySpace profilesof him? Only if the court determines that
- the principal is not a public figure, and
statements of fact rather than parodies, satire, or humor.
Given past case law, #1 could go either way but I'm guessing that #2 will
be pretty hard to prove. It will be interesting to see what happens.
Fryer, for bringing this case to my attention!]
19 American Law Reports (5th) 1. Who is "public figure" for purposes of
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Cosmologists propose a groundbreaking model of the universe using string theory.
- A new paper uses string theory to propose a new model of the universe.
- The researchers think our universe may be riding a bubble expanded by dark energy.
- All matter in the universe may exist in strings that reach into another dimension.
Evolution doesn't clean up after itself very well.
- An evolutionary biologist got people swapping ideas about our lingering vestigia.
- Basically, this is the stuff that served some evolutionary purpose at some point, but now is kind of, well, extra.
- Here are the six traits that inaugurated the fun.
For Damien Echols, tattoos are part of his existential armor.
- In prison Damien Echols was known by his number SK931, not his name, and had his hair sheared off. Stripped of his identity, the only thing he had left was his skin.
- This is why he began tattooing things that are meaningful to him — to carry a "suit of armor" made up the images of the people and things that have significance to him, from his friends to talismans.
- Echols believes that all places are imbued with divinity: "If you interact with New York City as if there's an intelligence behind... then it will behave towards you the same way.".
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.