Paper Trail: Michelangelo in a New, Old Medium

“My beard points to heaven, and I feel the nape of my neck on my hump,” Michelangelo wrote in a poem about his experience painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. “I bend my breast like a harpy’s, and, with nonstop dripping from above, my brush makes my face a richly decorated floor.” To accompany that poem, the artist sketched himself at work, stretching up to apply paint to the freshly applied plaster (detail shown above). In Michelangelo: A Life on Paper, Leonard Barkan, a professor of comparative literature at Princeton University, examines how Michelangelo—best known for timeless works chiseled from stone or painted on architectural surfaces—revealed his deepest self on that most fragile of media, paper. By following Michelangelo’s paper trail, Barkan discovers a more versatile artist of both pictures and words who seems more human and strikingly more modern than the Renaissance genius of legend.

Of the nearly 600 sheets of paper with drawings attributed to Michelangelo, one third contain writing as well. One quarter of Michelangelo’s 300 poems appear with drawings on the same page. “Michelangelo… was an assiduous writer,” Barkan argues, listing 500 letters, thousands of memos, and other writings in addition to the poetry, which scholars have examined for centuries, but usually separately from the art. “[W]e cannot understand Michelangelo without a radical sense of the way that pictures and words entangled themselves within his creative imagination,” Barkan says by way of justifying going where other scholars have feared, or not cared, to tread. By untangling that entanglement, Barkan cracks the code of the living cipher that Michelangelo was to contemporaries and continues to be to us today.

Barkan first paints an interesting backdrop of how words and images operated up to and within the Renaissance. As far back as Cimabue, artists placed words in their art in coordination with the images “in the interest of mutual elucidation,” as Barkan puts it. Whereas Leonardo da Vinci in his illustrated notebooks used images and text to “nail down the truth,” Barkan argues, in Michelangelo’s illustrated writings “the juxtaposed figure and word tend rather to signal the artist’s deepest uncertainties.” If Leonardo knows all the answers, Michelangelo asks all the questions.

Part of that uncertainty in Michelangelo comes from his desire not to be categorized. In the poem on the Sistine Chapel ordeal, Michelangelo’s face itself becomes a work of art, Barkan asserts, thus making Michelangelo the focus of attention and not any individual work of his hand and heart, even one as grand as the Sistine ceiling. “I think what turns [Michelangelo] into a painting-denying poet,” Barkan believes, is hope “that his talent places him in some heroic category of artist that is quite independent of any particular medium—especially, his current work for hire, fresco-painting.” Michelangelo’s defines himself as an artist who is “not just a painter, but rather a painter in the loftiest sense of the term: one whose eyes were made by the heavens to discriminate between the different modalities of beauty,” Barkan continues.

Barkan’s point is subtle, but he squeezes meaning from every squiggle and convincingly argues that Michelangelo strove to be a multimedia artist as much as possible within the confines of the 16th century. Writing and drawing thus become “neighbors on a continuum of creation” for Michelangelo, bringing together every aspect of the artist and showing a striving, struggling, longing mind to counter the age-old myth of the effortless artist doing the (art) work of God on Earth.

At times, Michelangelo’s “associative thinking,” as Barkan calls it, can be hard to follow, but the Princeton professor proves an able guide through the reams of drawings and writings, the most significant of which are illustrated nearby for easy references. Michelangelo the “exasperated instructor” guiding his pupils also comes through in Barkan’s examination. These classroom exchanges as well as other sheets strewn with seemingly disconnected words and pictures “are not stationary monuments but objects in active social commerce,” Barkan writes, and full of the energy of collaboration and creativity pushed beyond simple connections. “Viewed from the age of YouTube and Facebook,” Barkan writes of these entangled social pages, “the sixteenth century begins to look strangely familiar.” It’s not too much of an imaginative stretch to conclude that, if Michelangelo were alive today, he’d have a very cluttered and very active Facebook wall.

Barkan brings Michelangelo into the 21st century quite convincingly with such connections. Walter Pater once wrote that “all art aspires to the condition of music.” In Michelangelo’s case, all his art aspired to the condition of language, with all the rhetorical power of poetry as well as the playfulness of puns. With a similar spirit of pure joy in language’s capacity to illuminate great art and great artists, Leonard Barkan in Michelangelo: A Life on Paper gives us a more human Michelangelo who looks and sounds a lot like us today, but with all the genius left intact.

[Many thanks to Princeton University Press for providing me with a review copy of Leonard Barkan’s Michelangelo: A Life on Paper.]

Should you defend the free speech rights of neo-Nazis?

Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen discusses whether our society should always defend free speech rights, even for groups who would oppose such rights.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Former ACLU president Nadine Strossen understands that protecting free speech rights isn't always a straightforward proposition.
  • In this video, Strossen describes the reasoning behind why the ACLU defended the free speech rights of neo-Nazis in Skokie, Illinois, 1977.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

Moon mission 2.0: What humanity will learn by going back to the Moon

Going back to the moon will give us fresh insights about the creation of our solar system.

  • July 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the moon landing — Apollo 11.
  • Today, we have a strong scientific case for returning to the moon: the original rock samples that we took from the moon revolutionized our view of how Earth and the solar system formed. We could now glean even more insights with fresh, nonchemically-altered samples.
  • NASA plans to send humans to a crater in the South Pole of the moon because it's safer there, and would allow for better communications with people back on Earth.

NASA releases stunning image of ISS crossing in front of the sun

Strangely, the sun showed no sunspots at the time the photo was taken.

Image source: Rainee Colacurcio
Surprising Science
  • The photo shows the International Space Station as it orbits the Earth, as it does every 90 minutes.
  • The photo is remarkable because it offers a glimpse of the star at a time when there were no sunspots.
  • In November, astronauts aboard the ISS plan to grow Española chili pepper plants.
Keep reading Show less

U.S. Air Force warns UFO enthusiasts against storming Area 51

Jokesters and serious Area 51 raiders would be met with military force.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Facebook joke event to "raid Area 51" has already gained 1,000,000 "going" attendees.
  • The U.S. Air Force has issued an official warning to potential "raiders."
  • If anyone actually tries to storm an American military base, the use of deadly force is authorized.
Keep reading Show less