Did the Most Political Artist on Earth Just Sell Out?
Chinese activist Ai Weiwei is the most political artist on Earth. Did he just sell his soul to a department store?
Is there anything more damning than a photo with Paris Hilton? Chinese activist Ai Weiwei is the most political artist on Earth, enduring censorship and arrest from the Chinese government in his struggle to give a voice to the voiceless both in his native country and around the world. So, what is he doing with the one-time star of The Simple Life (shown above)? The answer is simple (and troubling): They were attending the opening of an exhibition of Ai’s art in a Paris department store. Such associations raise a troubling question: Did Ai Weiwei just sell his political and artistic soul?
What exactly did Ai do to raise such a question? On January 16, 2016, Ai Weiwei’s exhibition Er Xi opened at Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche in Paris, France. Er Xi (which means “Child’s Play” or “Playground”) features works by Ai hanging from the ceiling of, sitting in the gallery of, and appearing in the display windows of Le Bon Marché (which means “The Good Market” or “The Good Deal”). The theme of the exhibition is the Shan Hai Jing (also known as The Classic of Mountains and Seas), a collection of Chinese myths and legends that is part animal folktales and part geography lesson. With the help of Wong Yong-Xun, professional kite maker, Ai transforms those stories into bamboo and silk kites (such as The Dragon, shown above). The display window kites are two-dimensional (perhaps due to space restrictions), but those inside the store take the traditional two-dimensional woodcut illustrations of Chinese children’s literature and bring them to three-dimensional life.
It’s the commercialism that rankles critics of Er Xi. Ai’s work comes at the same time as a big “White Sale” promotion at Le Bon Marché, with more than a little synergy between the white linen for sale and the white silk of the kite figures. Can we take Ai’s political stances as seriously after he uses his work to hawk wares for a department store? “Showing at Le Bon Marché is using a new medium, the department store, to encounter a new audience, as broad as a museum’s,” Ai argues. If Jeff Koons made the same argument, we’d chalk it up to just another self-justifying excuse from a shamelessly commercial, self-promoting artist. But, when Ai Weiwei argues for department stores as “a new medium,” should we take him at his word?
It wouldn’t be the first time that Ai’s been accused of selling out. When Ai helped design the Beijing National Stadium (aka, “The Bird's Nest”) for the 2008 Summer Olympics, many saw a contradiction between Ai’s cooperation with the Chinese government’s propaganda party and his dissent. Ai defended his involvement in the stadium design by claiming that his love of design overcame his distaste for the Olympics and the nationalism they promoted, even later going so far as to criticize Steven Spielberg and Zhang Yimou for their involvement in the festivities. “It's disgusting,” Ai said at the time. “I don't like anyone who shamelessly abuses their profession, who makes no moral judgment.”
But did Ai Weiwei “abuse” his profession as artist and activist with poor “moral judgment” in Er Xi? Did he sell out? In the first place, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche is no Target (even if you pronounce it “tar jay”). Le Bon Marché Aristide Boucicaut founder may have introduced the “white sale” back in the 19th century, but he also displayed art from his personal collection in his store, setting an upscale precedent continued today. Boucicaut traveled in cultured circles (inspiring a character in Émile Zola’s Au Bonheur des Dames and posing for a portrait by William Bouguereau), so Ai’s work follows a fine tradition. If any department store could live up to the status of a museum, Le Bon Marché Rive Gauche is it.
Secondly, and most importantly, beneath the “child’s play” title and innocent exterior of Er Xi lies the subversive heart of Ai Weiwei’s art. Whimsy’s always been a part of Ai’s approach. Just take a look at his 2012 parody video of Korean musician Psy’s “Gangnam Style.” Ai danced for fun, but also to thumb his nose at the Chinese government’s attempts to contain him and his critiques. (The Chinese government actually blocked Ai’s parody in response.) Er Xi may allude to children’s tales, but Ai uses those same myths to make sly references to the long, troubled history of Chinese leadership. At the same time, he celebrates the mythic essence of China itself with these figures — an essence that endures despite the repressive government’s best efforts. Like Western fairy tales, these stories, if manipulated in the right way by the right artist, can say very adult, very controversial things.
If you still think that Ai Weiwei’s sold out and is hanging out with the Paris Hilton crowd now, consider what he did shortly before and shortly after that photo was taken. In late December, Ai visited the Greek island of Lesbos to help migrants and refugees from Europe with his presence as well with photos posted of their struggle on his social media accounts. And right after the opening of Er Xi, Ai closed two exhibitions in Denmark as a protest against new laws permitting not only the seizure of cash and valuables from asylum seekers, but also denying some refugee families from reuniting for three years. The 2015 Amnesty International Ambassador of Conscience Award winner doesn’t seem to be selling out or slowing down in his activism. New French legislation improving (at least in the near future) the process for refugees may save Er Xi from cancellation, but I have no doubt that Ai Weiwei — the art world’s ultimate refugee — won’t compromise his principles if it comes down to money versus morals.
Delay, deny and deflect were the strategies Facebook has used to navigate scandals it's faced in recent years, according to the New York Times.
- The exhaustive report is based on interviews with more than 50 people with ties to the company.
- It outlines how senior executives misled the public and lawmakers in regards to what it had discovered about privacy breaches and Russian interference in U.S. politics.
- On Thursday, Facebook cut ties with one of the companies, Definers Public Relations, listed in the report.
Protected animals are feared to be headed for the black market.
Sure we know it would be bad, but what do all of these scary numbers really mean?
- At the press time, the value was $21.7 trillion dollars.
- Lots of people know that a default would be bad, but not everybody seems to get how horrible it would be.
- While the risk is low, knowing what would happen if a default did occur is important information for all voters.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.