Politico and the (Bleak?) Future of Online News
The profile of Politico reporter Mike Allen in this weekend’s New York Times Magazine has drawn the ire of a couple prominent media authorities, who criticize Politico and Allen—as did the Times’ piece itself—for being gossipy, sensationalist, driven by inside information, and generally lax in its journalistic standards. Are these sour grapes from those jealous of Politico’s access or is the future of online news bleak?
Though Politico employs over fifty reporters, editors and analysts, it would seem that the depth of its influence is driven by Mike Allen and his wide network of Washington friend-informants. That Allen’s daily, email called the Playbook, makes its way into White House Advisor David Axelrod’s morning meetings is evidence of his pull inside the Beltway, but at what cost does this come to journalistic standards?
Dan Kennedy at Media Nation says Politico’s techniques demonstrate a deep bias for power and that Allen himself has an immature vision of politics as a mere baseball game, which he calls for his news junkie followers. The Columbia Journalism Review laments much of what emerges in Allen’s profile in the Times, particularly how he and Politico see their responsibility as influencing politics rather than merely reporting on it.
New, seemingly innocuous words replace old, troublesome ones. Politico seeks to "drive" the conversation in Washington rather than "influence" it and certain news stories are "marketed" to draw traffic to the site rather than "run for their journalist content."
Politico seems to rely solely on the grit of its journalists to get a scoop rather than its power as an institution. This is a characteristic experts in the media field recognize as particular to online sources without the large resource pool of traditional newspapers. It is an inherent quality that makes online sources weaker in terms of being able to sustain a concentration of resources on one particular story. The ephemeral nature of online stories also makes it necessary for them to aggressively push their scoops by inflating headlines and stretching facts to fit the entertainment needs of its audience—witness Politico’s unreliable reporting on Nancy Pelosi’s conflict with President Obama during health care negotiations.
Picture courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, user Peter Morgan.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."
- A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
- In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
- The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.
Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.
Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.
- Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
- Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
- But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.