100 principal blogs - Update 3

Listen to this post!

Last October I announced a bold new CASTLE initiative. Because of what was clearly a lack of presence by school principals in the blogosphere, we set an ambitious goal for ourselves of getting 100 principals up and blogging in 100 days. Dean Shareski at Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech expressed skepticism that we'd reach our goal. It's now the 100-day mark - how are we doing?

Obviously we're not doing as well as we had hoped. As the chart above shows, we've had 54 principals request a new blog. We've set up all those blogs, 5 in just the past few days. Of the other 49 principals, 25 are actively blogging (if sometimes infrequently) and 24 have never posted. I said in my comments to Dean's post that I anticipated this project would be interesting. Here are a few thoughts on what has occurred so far with this initiative:

  1. Reaching principals has been a challenge. Most principals are not active readers in the blogosphere and we have neither easy access to nor the budget for advertisements in the print publications that they do read. Nor do we have easy access to principals' e-mail addresses for electronic communications. We thus are dependent on others to help us spread the word about this project. To date we have seen clear 'bumps' in the number of requests that we get after each online update and/or conference presentation that we've done.
  • We have discovered a few principal blogs that we didn't know about. As word of this project has spread, principals have been e-mailing us their blog URLs. Right now we know of 21 principals who are blogging that did not start because of this project. You can access their blogs at our list of known principal blogs (they're the ones in red). It's possible that there are other principals using tools like edublogs, November Learning Communities, or blogging software provided by their school districts and we just don't know about them.
  • Although we haven't yet done a systematic survey of our active principal bloggers, my informal interactions with these folks have been uniformly positive. Several have been quite surprised at the positive reception that their blogs have received from parents and community members. Also, apparently several have been just dying for someone to offer them the opportunity to blog. As soon as we made the offer they not only started to blog quite frequently but also began asking for header graphic, clustr map, and myChingo modifications. They're really getting into it! It makes me wonder how many other principals would jump at the chance if they just knew about our offer. The principals that began blogging because of us clearly are finding value in doing so.
  • We have encountered difficulties with district and/or personal e-mail filtering systems. A significant percentage of our principals have not been able to receive the invitation e-mail from TypePad to set up their guest account because their districts block anything to do with TypePad. Others are finding that the TypePad invite goes straight into their junk mail folder. Either way, they never receive the information they need to get started. We also have heard from a couple of district technology coordinators and/or principals that they would like to do this but can't because of district restrictions on usage of outside tools.
  • I passed out cards with information about the project to nearly every attendee at the big educational administration professors conference in November. The idea was that we could reach local administrator and preservice administrator populations across the country through the professors that work with them. Although I can't say for sure, I'm fairly certain that we received only a handful of blog requests as a result of that work. I'm not sure why. Perhaps my educational leadership faculty colleagues at other institutions are not supportive of the project or perhaps they don't understand the potential of blogs enough to make it worth forwarding our information to their local educators.
  • We've also set up blogs for five central office administrators. They were interested in blogging and asked, so we said sure!
  • So has this project been a success? No and yes. No if we judge it by our initial ambitious goal of getting 100 new active principal blogs within 100 days. Yes if we recognize that we've already doubled the number of known principals in the blogosphere.

    Here are our next steps:

    1. I'm going to track our requests for another 50 days and report out on how we're doing. After that the project web site and our offer to create free blogs for principals will remain open but I'll quit reporting on our progress. Why the additional 50 days? I still am hopeful that we'll get some more folks to sign up because...
  • Earlier this week we sent out informational e-mails about the project to every state educational technology director in the country. We also sent out e-mails to the executive director of each state's superintendent association, secondary principal association, and elementary principal association and have notified CoSN, ISTE, SETDA, and others about the initiative. We asked these folks to pass the word along to their membership. We're already starting to see a surge of requests as a result.
  • Because word of mouth is the best advertisement, we will ask our active principal bloggers to tap one of their local peers and suggest that he or she start blogging too. Our active bloggers are in the best position to describe the benefits that they're seeing from blogging. Other principals will be best persuaded by one of their own who's already doing this.
  • We also will get some testimonials from our most active principal bloggers and put those up on our project web site. Maybe hearing from other principals will help persuade a few folks who hear about the project but are undecided.
  • If I can find a spare moment, I would like to write a brief article on principal blogging and submit it to a print publication that principals read. I think we would get some additional requests if we could get an article written up and published. This won't happen within the next 50 days, though, both because of my schedule and because practitioner magazines don't turn stuff around that quickly.
  • I will continue to present about the project, either live at conferences or virtually via videoconferencing, as much as I can (first folks have to ask!). I have a couple of presentations coming up that may net a few requests.
  • We're open to suggestions, comments, or other feedback that anyone has for us. We are extremely thankful for all of the support and publicity folks have given us to date. I am confident that eventually we will reach our goal of creating 100 new, active principal blogs. It just may take us longer than we had hoped.

    LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

    Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

    Getty Images
    Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

    No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

    Keep reading Show less

    Kosovo land swap could end conflict - or restart war

    Best case: redrawing borders leads to peace, prosperity and EU membership. But there's also a worst case

    Image: SRF
    Strange Maps
    • The Yugoslav Wars started in 1991, but never really ended
    • Kosovo and Serbia are still enemies, and they're getting worse
    • A proposed land swap could create peace - or reignite the conflict

    The death of Old Yugoslavia

    Image: public domain

    United Yugoslavia on a CIA map from 1990.

    Wars are harder to finish than to start. Take for instance the Yugoslav Wars, which raged through most of the 1990s.

    The first shot was fired at 2.30 pm on June 27th, 1991, when an officer in the Yugoslav People's Army took aim at Slovenian separatists. When the YPA retreated on July 7th, Slovenia was the first of Yugoslavia's republics to have won its independence.

    After the wars

    Image: Ijanderson977, CC BY-SA 3.0 / Wikimedia Commons

    Map of former Yugoslavia in 2008, when Kosovo declared its independence. The geopolitical situation remains the same today.

    The Ten-Day War cost less than 100 casualties. The other wars – in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo (1) – lasted much longer and were a lot bloodier. By early 1999, when NATO had forced Serbia to concede defeat in Kosovo, close to 140,000 people had been killed and four million civilians displaced.

    So when was the last shot fired? Perhaps it never was: it's debatable whether the Yugoslav Wars are actually over. That's because Kosovo is a special case. Although inhabited by an overwhelming ethnic-Albanian majority, Kosovo is of extreme historical and symbolic significance for Serbians. More importantly, from a legalistic point of view: Kosovo was never a separate republic within Yugoslavia but rather a (nominally) autonomous province within Serbia.

    Kosovo divides the world

    Image: public domain

    In red: states that have recognised the independence of Kosovo (most EU member states – with the notable exceptions of Spain, Greece, Romania and Slovakia; and the U.S., Japan, Turkey and Egypt, among many others). In blue: states that continue to recognise Serbia's sovereignty over Kosovo (most notably Russia and China, but also other major countries such as India, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa and Iran).

    The government of Serbia has made its peace and established diplomatic relations with all other former Yugoslav countries, but not with Kosovo. In Serbian eyes, Kosovo's declaration of independence in 2008 was a unilateral and therefore legally invalid change of state borders. Belgrade officially still considers Kosovo a 'renegade province', and it has a lot of international support for that position (2). Not just from its historical protector Russia, but also from other states that face separatist movements (e.g. Spain and India).

    Despite their current conflict, Kosovo and Serbia have the same long-term objective: membership of the European Union. Ironically, that wish could lead to Yugoslav reunification some years down the road – within the EU. Slovenia and Croatia have already joined, and all other ex-Yugoslav states would like to follow their example. Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia have already submitted an official application. The EU considers Bosnia and Kosovo 'potential candidates'.

    Kosovo is the main stumbling block on Serbia's road to EU membership. Even after the end of hostilities, skirmishes continued between the ethnically Albanian majority and the ethnically Serbian minority within Kosovo, and vice versa in Serbian territories directly adjacent. Tensions are dormant at best. A renewed outbreak of armed conflict is not unthinkable.

    Land for peace?

    Image: BBC

    Mitrovica isn't the only area majority-Serb area in Kosovo, but the others are enclaved and fear being abandoned in a land swap.

    In fact, relations between Kosovo and Serbia have deteriorated spectacularly in the past few months. At the end of November, Kosovo was refused membership of Interpol, mainly on the insistence of Serbia. In retaliation, Kosovo imposed a 100% tariff on all imports from Serbia. After which Serbia's prime minister Ana Brnabic refused to exclude her country's "option" to intervene militarily in Kosovo. Upon which Kosovo's government decided to start setting up its own army – despite its prohibition to do so as one of the conditions of its continued NATO-protected independence.

    The protracted death of Yugoslavia will be over only when this simmering conflict is finally resolved. The best way to do that, politicians on both sides have suggested, is for the borders reflect the ethnic makeup of the frontier between Kosovo and Serbia.

    The biggest and most obvious pieces of the puzzle are the Serbian-majority district of Mitrovica in northern Kosovo, and the Albanian-majority Presevo Valley, in southwestern Serbia. That land swap was suggested previous summer by no less than Hashim Thaci and Aleksandar Vucic, presidents of Kosovo and Serbia respectively. Best-case scenario: that would eliminate the main obstacle to mutual recognition, joint EU membership and future prosperity.

    If others can do it...

    Image: Ruland Kolen

    Belgium and the Netherlands recently adjusted out their common border to conform to the straightened Meuse River.

    Sceptics - and more than a few locals - warn that there also is a worst-case scenario: the swap could rekindle animosities and restart the war. A deal along those lines would almost certainly exclude six Serbian-majority municipalities enclaved deep within Kosovo. While Serbian Mitrovica, which borders Serbia proper, is home to some 40,000 inhabitants, those enclaves represent a further 80,000 ethnic Serbs – who fear being totally abandoned in a land swap, and eventually forced out of their homes.

    Western powers, which sponsored Kosovo's independence, are divided over the plan. U.S. officials back the idea, as do some within the EU. But the Germans are against – they are concerned about the plan's potential to fire up regional tensions rather than eliminate them.

    Borders are the Holy Grail of modern nationhood. Countries consider their borders inviolate and unchanging. Nevertheless, land swaps are not unheard of. Quite recently, Belgium and the Netherlands exchanged territories so their joint border would again match up with the straightened course of the River Meuse (3). But those bits of land were tiny and uninhabited. And as the past has amply shown, borders pack a lot more baggage in the Balkans.

    Keep reading Show less

    Scientists claim the Bible is written in code that predicts future events

    The controversy around the Torah codes gets a new life.

    Michael Drosnin
    Surprising Science
    • Mathematicians claim to see a predictive pattern in the ancient Torah texts.
    • The code is revealed by a method found with special computer software.
    • Some events described by reading the code took place after the code was written.
    Keep reading Show less
    • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
    • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
    • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
    Keep reading Show less