As the details of the undercover operation to infiltrate AQAP continue to be made public the picture of what happened is starting clear. As I wrote yesterday, it appears that the individual did indeed have a western passport - from the UK - and was initially recruited by British intelligence, which was involved in the operation along with the Saudis and CIA.
Obviously this operation was a stunning success for western and Saudi intelligence - or at least it was before all the juicy details started to leak. But, the question I'm pondering this morning is how damaging was this to AQAP.
And I do think the two things - success for the west and damage to AQAP - are separate things. Just because this was an intelligence coup doesn't mean it damaged AQAP.
First, we - or at least, I'm - unsure if information from the undercover operation led to the drone strike on Fahd al-Qusa. So, that is open question, which we'll put to the side for the moment.
Beyond that, what else did AQAP lose?
Ibrahim Asiri - the bombmaker we know about, but likely not the only one - is still at-large and indeed AQAP seems to have been concerned enough about security protocol that the undercover agent apparently never met Asiri, nor did he apparently visit the bomb laboratory that AQAP claims to posses.
AQAP did lose a bomb and now the US has in its hands the latest version of what AQAP was attempting to smuggle on to a plane, but that is about it. Intelligence agencies foiled this plot, but they didn't damage AQAP's ability to conduct similar attempts in the future. And that is worrying.
I would also like to push back a bit against the common assumption in the west that Asiri is a creative or evil genius.
It may be the case that Asiri is truly the mastermind of all of these attacks - although that was also said about Anwar al-Awlaki before the US killed him in late 2011.
Let's go back to the beginning - I won't give Asiri's complete history, which I have already written about here, and is dealt with completely in an upcoming publication - but let's look at the first attack we know he was involved with.
That would be the August 2009 attempt to assassinate Muhammad bin Nayif. We know that Ibrahim's younger brother, Abdullah, was the suicide bomber and it is often assumed that Ibrahim was the mastermind behind this plot.
But what we know is that the idea for the assassination came not from Ibrahim Asiri but rather from Qasim al-Raymi, AQAP's military commander.
What we don't know is how involved Asiri was in the planning. We know he built the bomb. But was the idea for disguising the bomb in his brother's rectum his or did this come from Raymi or someone else?
We know that Asiri built the 2009 bomb - but was the idea his? What I'm getting at is the possibility that Asiri - despite what is written in the press - may be more technical expert than innovative genius.
He might be the individual responsible for all these ideas about bomb placement - but what we know about AQAP suggests that this is more a result of continuing discussions between a number of people often led by Raymi of which Asiri is a part - but only a part.
Just a little push back against the idea - like last year's idea about Awlaki - that the US and the west will somehow be safer if only Asiri were dead. I'm not so sure.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Is it "perverseness," the "death drive," or something else?
She met mere mortals with and without the Vatican's approval.
- For centuries, the Virgin Mary has appeared to the faithful, requesting devotion and promising comfort.
- These maps show the geography of Marian apparitions – the handful approved by the Vatican, and many others.
- Historically, Europe is where most apparitions have been reported, but the U.S. is pretty fertile ground too.
It's up to us humans to re-humanize our world. An economy that prioritizes growth and profits over humanity has led to digital platforms that "strip the topsoil" of human behavior, whole industries, and the planet, giving less and less back. And only we can save us.
- It's an all-hands-on-deck moment in the arc of civilization.
- Everyone has a choice: Do you want to try to earn enough money to insulate yourself from the world you're creating— or do you want to make the world a place you don't have to insulate yourself from?
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.