Measuring Success

As the details of the undercover operation to infiltrate AQAP continue to be made public the picture of what happened is starting clear.  As I wrote yesterday, it appears that the individual did indeed have a western passport - from the UK - and was initially recruited by British intelligence, which was involved in the operation along with the Saudis and CIA.


Obviously this operation was a stunning success for western and Saudi intelligence - or at least it was before all the juicy details started to leak.  But, the question I'm pondering this morning is how damaging was this to AQAP. 

And I do think the two things - success for the west and damage to AQAP - are separate things.  Just because this was an intelligence coup doesn't mean it damaged AQAP.

First, we - or at least, I'm - unsure if information from the undercover operation led to the drone strike on Fahd al-Qusa.  So, that is open question, which we'll put to the side for the moment.

Beyond that, what else did AQAP lose? 

Ibrahim Asiri - the bombmaker we know about, but likely not the only one - is still at-large and indeed AQAP seems to have been concerned enough about security protocol that the undercover agent apparently never met Asiri, nor did he apparently visit the bomb laboratory that AQAP claims to posses. 

AQAP did lose a bomb and now the US has in its hands the latest version of what AQAP was attempting to smuggle on to a plane, but that is about it.  Intelligence agencies foiled this plot, but they didn't damage AQAP's ability to conduct similar attempts in the future.  And that is worrying. 

I would also like to push back a bit against the common assumption in the west that Asiri is a creative or evil genius.

It may be the case that Asiri is truly the mastermind of all of these attacks - although that was also said about Anwar al-Awlaki before the US killed him in late 2011.

Let's go back to the beginning - I won't give Asiri's complete history, which I have already written about here, and is dealt with completely in an upcoming publication - but let's look at the first attack we know he was involved with.

That would be the August 2009 attempt to assassinate Muhammad bin Nayif.  We know that Ibrahim's younger brother, Abdullah, was the suicide bomber and it is often assumed that Ibrahim was the mastermind behind this plot.

But what we know is that the idea for the assassination came not from Ibrahim Asiri but rather from Qasim al-Raymi, AQAP's military commander. 

What we don't know is how involved Asiri was in the planning.  We know he built the bomb.  But was the idea for disguising the bomb in his brother's rectum his or did this come from Raymi or someone else?

We know that Asiri built the 2009 bomb - but was the idea his?  What I'm getting at is the possibility that Asiri - despite what is written in the press - may be more technical expert than innovative genius.

He might be the individual responsible for all these ideas about bomb placement - but what we know about AQAP suggests that this is more a result of continuing discussions between a number of people often led by Raymi of which Asiri is a part - but only a part. 

Just a little push back against the idea - like last year's idea about Awlaki - that the US and the west will somehow be safer if only Asiri were dead.  I'm not so sure. 

Big Think
Sponsored by Lumina Foundation

Upvote/downvote each of the videos below!

As you vote, keep in mind that we are looking for a winner with the most engaging social venture pitch - an idea you would want to invest in.

Keep reading Show less

Why Lil Dicky made this star-studded Earth Day music video

"Earth" features about 30 of the biggest names in entertainment.

Culture & Religion
  • Lil Dicky is a rapper and comedian who released his debut album in 2015.
  • His new music video, "Earth," features artists such as Justin Bieber, Ariana Grande, Ed Sheehan, Kevin Hart, and Leonardo DiCaprio.
  • All proceeds of the music video will go to environmental causes, Dicky said.
Keep reading Show less

After death, you’re aware that you’ve died, say scientists

Some evidence attributes a certain neurological phenomenon to a near death experience.

Credit: Petr Kratochvil. PublicDomainPictures.net.
Surprising Science

Time of death is considered when a person has gone into cardiac arrest. This is the cessation of the electrical impulse that drive the heartbeat. As a result, the heart locks up. The moment the heart stops is considered time of death. But does death overtake our mind immediately afterward or does it slowly creep in?

Keep reading Show less

Behold, the face of a Neolithic dog

He was a very good boy.

Image source: Historic Environment Scotland
Surprising Science
  • A forensic artist in Scotland has made a hyper realistic model of an ancient dog.
  • It was based on the skull of a dog dug up in Orkney, Scotland, which lived and died 4,000 years ago.
  • The model gives us a glimpse of some of the first dogs humans befriended.
Keep reading Show less