Self-Motivation
David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Actor
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Management
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
Learn
from the world's big
thinkers
Start Learning

Measuring Success

As the details of the undercover operation to infiltrate AQAP continue to be made public the picture of what happened is starting clear.  As I wrote yesterday, it appears that the individual did indeed have a western passport - from the UK - and was initially recruited by British intelligence, which was involved in the operation along with the Saudis and CIA.


Obviously this operation was a stunning success for western and Saudi intelligence - or at least it was before all the juicy details started to leak.  But, the question I'm pondering this morning is how damaging was this to AQAP. 

And I do think the two things - success for the west and damage to AQAP - are separate things.  Just because this was an intelligence coup doesn't mean it damaged AQAP.

First, we - or at least, I'm - unsure if information from the undercover operation led to the drone strike on Fahd al-Qusa.  So, that is open question, which we'll put to the side for the moment.

Beyond that, what else did AQAP lose? 

Ibrahim Asiri - the bombmaker we know about, but likely not the only one - is still at-large and indeed AQAP seems to have been concerned enough about security protocol that the undercover agent apparently never met Asiri, nor did he apparently visit the bomb laboratory that AQAP claims to posses. 

AQAP did lose a bomb and now the US has in its hands the latest version of what AQAP was attempting to smuggle on to a plane, but that is about it.  Intelligence agencies foiled this plot, but they didn't damage AQAP's ability to conduct similar attempts in the future.  And that is worrying. 

I would also like to push back a bit against the common assumption in the west that Asiri is a creative or evil genius.

It may be the case that Asiri is truly the mastermind of all of these attacks - although that was also said about Anwar al-Awlaki before the US killed him in late 2011.

Let's go back to the beginning - I won't give Asiri's complete history, which I have already written about here, and is dealt with completely in an upcoming publication - but let's look at the first attack we know he was involved with.

That would be the August 2009 attempt to assassinate Muhammad bin Nayif.  We know that Ibrahim's younger brother, Abdullah, was the suicide bomber and it is often assumed that Ibrahim was the mastermind behind this plot.

But what we know is that the idea for the assassination came not from Ibrahim Asiri but rather from Qasim al-Raymi, AQAP's military commander. 

What we don't know is how involved Asiri was in the planning.  We know he built the bomb.  But was the idea for disguising the bomb in his brother's rectum his or did this come from Raymi or someone else?

We know that Asiri built the 2009 bomb - but was the idea his?  What I'm getting at is the possibility that Asiri - despite what is written in the press - may be more technical expert than innovative genius.

He might be the individual responsible for all these ideas about bomb placement - but what we know about AQAP suggests that this is more a result of continuing discussions between a number of people often led by Raymi of which Asiri is a part - but only a part. 

Just a little push back against the idea - like last year's idea about Awlaki - that the US and the west will somehow be safer if only Asiri were dead.  I'm not so sure. 

LIVE EVENT | Radical innovation: Unlocking the future of human invention

Innovation in manufacturing has crawled since the 1950s. That's about to speed up.

Big Think LIVE

Add event to calendar

AppleGoogleOffice 365OutlookOutlook.comYahoo


Keep reading Show less

Two MIT students just solved Richard Feynman’s famed physics puzzle

Richard Feynman once asked a silly question. Two MIT students just answered it.

Surprising Science

Here's a fun experiment to try. Go to your pantry and see if you have a box of spaghetti. If you do, take out a noodle. Grab both ends of it and bend it until it breaks in half. How many pieces did it break into? If you got two large pieces and at least one small piece you're not alone.

Keep reading Show less

Unfiltered lessons of a female entrepreneur

Join Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter and best-selling author Charles Duhigg as he interviews Victoria Montgomery Brown, co-founder and CEO of Big Think.

Big Think LIVE

Women today are founding more businesses than ever. In 2018, they made up 40% of new entrepreneurs, yet in that same year, they received just 2.2% of all venture capital investment. The playing field is off-balance. So what can women do?

Keep reading Show less

Why ‘Christian nationalists’ are less likely to wear masks and social distance

In a recent study, researchers examined how Christian nationalism is affecting the U.S. response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

A Catholic priest wearing a facemask and face shield blesses a hospital on August 6, 2020 in Manila, Philippines

Ezra Acayan/Getty Images
Coronavirus
  • A new study used survey data to examine the interplay between Christian nationalism and incautious behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The researchers defined Christian nationalism as "an ideology that idealizes and advocates a fusion of American civic life with a particular type of Christian identity and culture."
  • The results showed that Christian nationalism was the leading predictor that Americans engaged in incautious behavior.
Keep reading Show less
Sex & Relationships

Two-thirds of parents say technology makes parenting harder

Parental anxieties stem from the complex relationship between technology, child development, and the internet's trove of unseemly content.

Scroll down to load more…
Quantcast