Neil deGrasse Tyson on His Books

Question: What did you learn writing The Pluto Files and Death By Black Hole?

DeGrasse Tyson:    For me, the most fascinating aspect of “The Pluto Files” was watching the depth of emotion that people brought to bear on what they would believe to be the scientific reason for why they hold those thoughts, for why they have those beliefs.  So in other words, you would say, I think Pluto is a planet, well, why?  And then, they give a list of scientific reasons.  But they’ll be, like, weak reasons, they’ll be… ‘Cause I watched it happen, I watched it.  So people would say, Pluto is a planet, why?  ‘Cause it has a moon.  And planets have moons.  And then, a few years later, we found that an asteroid had a moon.  So they couldn’t use that argument anymore because it was unimpeachably little potato shaped asteroid.  And so, they have to sort of abandon that and say, well, Pluto… And just to watch arguments come and go.  And you realize that at the end of the day, it’s all about people’s emotions.  Not all but predominantly.  And I was intrigued by this because it’s emotions that drive art.  Rational thoughts never drive people’s creativity the way emotions do.  And so, the controversy jump species and it went out of the scientific community, out of the classroom, and landed in the laps of humorists, of cartoonists, of op-ed writers who write humorous op-eds.  And everybody took a piece of Pluto.  A “Death by Black Hole” is a collection of my essays that I’d written over 10 years for Natural History magazine.  And there’s a title essay called “Death by Black hole” in a section titled “When the Universe Turns Bad.  All the ways the cosmos wants to kill us.”  It talks about gamma ray burst and asteroid strikes and that sort of thing.  But by, in large, in spite of that title, the book is predominantly about how science works with sections titled “The nature of… Nature of Discovery” and “The Discovery of Nature,” how we come to learn what we know about the universe.  And so, I’ve gotten very good feedback, very positive feedback on that book because people… It’s not just telling you what to know, it’s empowering you how to think about the physical world.  And about that, I’m proud that I’ve succeeded in that way.  It was a side benefit that I had not anticipated.  I thought that as a minimum, I teach a little bit about black holes and the universe.  But people have been… have deeply appreciated and resonated with the rest of what the book is, which allows you to take on a little bit of the [lands] that so many scientists take for granted.  It’s the [lands] of curiosity folded with the [land] of the empowerment of a thought.  It’s not simply what to know about the universe, it’s how to think about the universe.  So you can go on and feel more connected than you ever had been before.

Question: What’s your next book idea?

DeGrasse Tyson:    One is I want to write a book on the educational system, how best to train people to think.  To be scientifically literate, I think, is important, something we’re lacking in school.  We think scientific literacy flows out of how many science facts can you recite rather than how was your brain wired for thinking.  And it’s the brain wiring that I’m more interested in rather than the facts that come out of the curriculum or the lesson plan that’s been proposed.

The astrophysicist summarizes two of his books and one he has in the works.

Compelling speakers do these 4 things every single time

The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think

Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee rally at the Anaheim Convention Center on September 8, 2018 in Anaheim, California. (Photo by Barbara Davidson/Getty Images)
Personal Growth

The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.

Keep reading Show less

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to good health and well-being

Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.

Image courtesy of Pfizer.
Sponsored
  • Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
  • As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
  • If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
  • Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
  • By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Keep reading Show less

Preserving truth: How to confront and correct fake news

Journalism got a big wake up call in 2016. Can we be optimistic about the future of media?

Videos
  • "[T]o have a democracy that thrives and actually that manages to stay alive at all, you need regular citizens being able to get good, solid information," says Craig Newmark.
  • The only constructive way to deal with fake news? Support trustworthy media. In 2018, Newmark was announced as a major donor of two new media organizations, The City, which will report on New York City-area stories which may have otherwise gone unreported, and The Markup, which will report on technology.
  • Greater transparency of fact-checking within media organizations could help confront and correct fake news. Organizations already exist to make media more trustworthy — are we using them? There's The Trust Project, International Fact-Checkers Network, and Tech & Check.
Keep reading Show less